Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Мак для Морфея

Channel

Мак для Морфея

@poppyformorpheus

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

228subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002213909218
TypeChannel
Username@poppyformorpheus
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/poppyformorpheus

Growth

228231229.56 August 2026 — 231 subscribers7 August 2026 — 231 subscribers16 August 2026 — 228 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 228–231 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 08:23228-3
7 Aug 2026, 02:48231no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:03231first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
60.8%
avg views ÷ 228 subscribers
Avg views / post
139
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held15 (25 July 20261 August 2026)
Views total2,078
Reactions total234
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 02:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

234 reactions across 15 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52268457961623543317833.3%
6326.9%
🍓3816.2%
custom 51904433069238889703113.2%
💘114.70%
🥰31.28%
❤‍🔥20.855%
🤔20.855%
🤝20.855%
🆒10.427%
💋10.427%
😭10.427%
🤯10.427%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 234reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 10:27 UTC98 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Я вам уже говорила как сильно я люблю самсунговские заметки?? Я в целом амбассадор Самсунга, но самсунговские заметки...🤩 Практически всё, что когда-либо мной было написано, было написано именно там, и да, на телефоне. Никаких вот этих вот вордов, гугл доков, неееет😁 Cr тт: jay___sangte

custom 522684579616235433115custom 51904433069238889703🍓2🤝1

30 Jul 2026, 16:15 UTC125 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#Шняга_из_щп Типо...неужели это всё существовало во всём том, что я видела?? Композиция она здесь со мной в одной комнате?? У меня реально как будто какое-то полушарие заработало АХАХ Я ДУМАЛА ОНО АТРОФИРОВАНО. Осталось понять, как это всё применить 😐

🍓7custom 522684579616235433132custom 51904433069238889702

30 Jul 2026, 16:12 UTC120 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#Шняга_из_щп Окей, я досмотрела, кхм, и я в ахуе— От какой-то информации в видео я щас сидела без рофла с открытым ртом, у меня как будто мозг на 105% заработал, я никогда даже НЕ ДУМАЛА о таких вещах. Мне как будто фокус показали, Я НЕ ЗНАЮ А ещё какие-то приёмы я смутно понимала, и когда их называли и показывали картинку до объяснения, у меня как будто мир расширялся и я видела то, чего никогда не видела раньше, Я

🍓5custom 522684579616235433121custom 51904433069238889701

30 Jul 2026, 15:46 UTC121 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#Шняга_из_щп Знаете есть мем "эта табличка меня не остановит, потому что я не умею читать", только у меня это "эта картинка меня не остановит, потому что на ней нет букв"🏃‍♂️

10custom 51904433069238889702🍓1

30 Jul 2026, 15:44 UTC119 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#Шняга_из_щп Мне посоветовали видео для изучения основ композиции (я пытаюсь делать коллажики), и как же меня гасит с того, что несмотря то, что все правила и приёмы поясняются картинками и схематичными рисунками, я всё равно для себя всё объясняю аналогичными писательскими правилами и приёмами😄👍 Я не умею думать картинками, френды, я думаю только текстом😬 И фантазирую тоже текстом, и когда я представляю что-то в г

14custom 52268457961623543316🤔2🤯1

28 Jul 2026, 15:41 UTC137 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Какую только хуйню не придумают чтобы людям за деньги втюхать. Клянусь, я уже жду когда за каждое обновление страницы на Фикбуке будет списываться по 50 рублей + 100 рублей за 30 минут посещения сайта

custom 5226845796162354331165🍓2custom 51904433069238889702🤝1🆒1

27 Jul 2026, 16:06 UTC131 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#Наруто Ахуеть, эта группа по снс постила мой фф в 2024, а я увидела только сейчас 😐 Я знала, что они брали мой другой ФФ два раза (я тоже об этом чисто случайно узнала, лол), я рассказывала сейчас об этом в одной беседе, решила снова чекнуть и оказывается они брали ЕЩЁ один мой фф аххахахах бля как я не заметила И перечитывая этот фик я понимаю, насколько вырос мой скилл🤓

custom 51904433069238889704🍓3custom 52268457961623543313

27 Jul 2026, 16:06 UTC168 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @sns_with_lovePhoto

— Прости меня. Глаза Наруто расширяются. Словно парализованный, он стоит, вслушиваясь в тихий шорох листьев, и едва может осознать хотя бы самого себя. — Тебе страшно. Всё это время было страшно, а я заметил только сейчас. Саске говорит тихо, прижимая его к себе. Когда они успели поменяться ролями? — Саске… Саске, ты… — Наруто пытается не то вывернуться, не то удержаться, вцепившись в чужие плечи — внезапно мир о

🍓8custom 52268457961623543315custom 519044330692388897042

26 Jul 2026, 14:27 UTC162 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

А это я просила подругу написать в анонимку чтобы проверить работает ли она🥹🥹🥹😭😭😭

custom 52268457961623543316🍓1😭1custom 51904433069238889701

26 Jul 2026, 14:27 UTC148 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Здравствуйте! Скажите, пожалуйста, а почему ваша главная админка такая булочка? 👀🥹

10🍓2🥰1custom 51904433069238889701

26 Jul 2026, 14:27 UTC149 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

А скажите ещё, пожалуйста, почему ваша библиотека такая замечательная?

9🍓2🥰2custom 51904433069238889701

26 Jul 2026, 14:04 UTC136 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#ДэмОн #Шняга_из_щп Смотрите чё у нас!!🥰 Ниже я ругаюсь🥰🌷💓 Госплди как же я с ней ебалась с этой анонимкой вы себе даже не представляете мне за эти муки что-то положено я не знаю мне даже тг пришлось обновить чего я не делала очень давно и не хотела я буквально несколько часов сейчас пыталась перековырять там всё что есть чтобы обнаружить что две функции с одинаковым названием имеют разное предназначение просто одна

custom 522684579616235433162🍓1💋1custom 51904433069238889701

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @poppyformorpheus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 333,536 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мак для Морфея” (@poppyformorpheus), 228 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/poppyformorpheus.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.