Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Популярная культура

Channel

Популярная культура

@popculture_podcast

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

141subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002310800509
TypeChannel
Username@popculture_podcast
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 24 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/popculture_podcast

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

141142141.57 August 2026 — 141 subscribers8 August 2026 — 142 subscribers8 August 2026 — 142 subscribers5 September 2026 — 141 subscribers7 August 20265 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 29 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 141–142 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 22:21141-1
8 Aug 2026, 22:00142no change
8 Aug 2026, 14:41142+1
7 Aug 2026, 22:19141first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

236 reactions across 20 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥9841.5%
❤5724.2%
❤‍🔥2711.4%
👍239.75%
💔104.24%
🥰83.39%
🆒41.69%
👏20.847%
🤝20.847%
🤩20.847%
⚡10.424%
👀10.424%
🫡10.424%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 236 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 3 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Jul 2026, 16:11 UTC136 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Галина Стрижевская. Продюсер «Ёлок» и «Слова пацана» о российской киноиндустрии и профессии Подробный разговор с Галиной Стрижевской, продюсером «Елок», «Слова пацана», «Нины» и других крупных российских проектов. Разбираемся, чем живет сегодня отечественная киноиндустрия, как возникают идеи новых проектов, в чем феномен «Слова пацана» и спроса на ностальгию по прошлым десятилетиям, к чему приведет бурное развитие с…

❤‍🔥6👍6🔥3❤2👏1🆒1

3 Jul 2026, 16:11 UTC113 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

Таймкоды: 00:00 - Тизерим и представляем гостью 01:24 - А чем на самом деле занимается продюсер? 05:04 - Что первостепенно: идея или запрос? 11:22 - Есть ли у Галины любимый проект? 13:04 - Как физик стала продюсером и чем такое образование помогает в новой профессии? 19:24 - Куча вопросов про «Слово пацана» (в том числе и про продолжение) 33:09 - Про перегрев отечественной киноиндустрии 40:53 - Взгляд в недалекое бу…

❤‍🔥7👍4🔥3❤1👏1🆒1

28 Jun 2026, 13:51 UTC139 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

НАЧИНАЕМ КАРАТЬ ЧЕРЕЗ 10 МИНУТ! https://vk.com/video-217971786_456239381 https://youtube.com/live/0pxElCfcqiM?feature=share

❤5🔥3🤩1

27 Jun 2026, 15:11 UTC135 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

«Популярный Каратель» Это свершится! Уже завтра, 28.06 в 17:00, мы будем всей редакцией проходить уже легендарную для нашего подкаста игру – «Каратель». Комиксная жуть и странный дубляж Дмитрия Дюжева гарантируются. Приходите вместе громко смеяться и провожать текущий сезон в отпуск! И не забудьте взять с собой подарки для именинников, у нас их на этой неделе целых два! https://vk.com/popculture_podcast?z=video-21…

🔥5❤4🥰1🫡1

25 Jun 2026, 16:11 UTC99 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Дайджест | «Паук-нуар», «Коммерсант» и «Гренландия-2» Очередная порция новостей и впечатлений. Сегодня гадаем, каким будет «Шрек-5», торопим Джорджа Миллера с его амбициозными планами на «Безумного Макса», огорчаемся закрытием «Бороуза», разбираемся, стоило ли вообще снимать вторую часть «Гренландии», выясняем, стоит ли смотреть «Коммерсант» с Александром Петровым и Хаски и почему «Паук-нуар» с Николасом Кейджем не …

❤7🔥5👍1🥰1🆒1

25 Jun 2026, 16:11 UTC123 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

Таймкоды: 00:00:00 - Приветствуем и разгоняемся 00:07:07 - Собираемся возрождать «Бороуз» на собственном стриминговом сервисе 00:11:54 - Новый трейлер нового «Шрека» 00:15:32 - Миллер оптимистично объявил планы на новых «Безумных Максов» 00:19:36 - Уходим в отпуск! 00:22:19 - Денис Алексеевич про упущенный потенциал «Паука-Нуара» 00:32:05 - Владимир Викторович про апокалиптическую тупость сиквела «Гренландии» 00:50:0…

❤6🔥6🥰2👍1🆒1

19 Jun 2026, 13:11 UTC133 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

А в комментариях под этим постом можно предлагать девизы нашего поп-культурного дома 🌚 Автор лучшего варианта получит наш фирменный приз 🤭

👍3🔥3

19 Jun 2026, 12:12 UTC128 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

... Денис Алексеевич

  1. Таргариен13%
  2. Старк27%
  3. Мартелл7%
  4. Грейджой0%
  5. Ланнистер10%
  6. Тирелл3%
  7. Аррен3%
  8. Талли3%
  9. Баратеон53%

The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🔥5

19 Jun 2026, 12:11 UTC133 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

... Никита Александрович

  1. Ланнистер7%
  2. Старк10%
  3. Грейджой7%
  4. Талли13%
  5. Аррен7%
  6. Таргариен13%
  7. Тирелл30%
  8. Мартелл13%
  9. Баратеон17%

The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🔥5

19 Jun 2026, 12:11 UTC104 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

... Владимир Викторович

  1. Старк26%
  2. Ланнистер23%
  3. Аррен16%
  4. Талли10%
  5. Мартелл6%
  6. Грейджой6%
  7. Баратеон3%
  8. Тирелл0%
  9. Таргариен16%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🔥5

19 Jun 2026, 12:11 UTC100 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Заполните пропуски 🤠

🔥3🤝1

18 Jun 2026, 16:11 UTC98 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Что для нас спин-оффы «Игры престолов» Финал игропрестольного цикла. Сегодня пытаемся успеть всё, чего не успели за прошлые эпизоды. Разбираемся в многочисленных домах Вестероса и разбираем фанатские теории, душним о душном «Доме Дракона» и в очередной раз восторгаемся «Рыцарем Семи Королевств», перебираем все еще не состоявшиеся или уже отмененные проекты во франшизе и запускаем конкурс девизов. Яндекс Музыка App…

❤5🔥3👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @popculture_podcast. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Jun 2026, 12:12 UTCAnonymous Poll30 voters

... Денис Алексеевич

  1. Таргариен13%
  2. Старк27%
  3. Мартелл7%
  4. Грейджой0%
  5. Ланнистер10%
  6. Тирелл3%
  7. Аррен3%
  8. Талли3%
  9. Баратеон53%

The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

19 Jun 2026, 12:11 UTCAnonymous Poll30 voters

... Никита Александрович

  1. Ланнистер7%
  2. Старк10%
  3. Грейджой7%
  4. Талли13%
  5. Аррен7%
  6. Таргариен13%
  7. Тирелл30%
  8. Мартелл13%
  9. Баратеон17%

The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

19 Jun 2026, 12:11 UTCAnonymous Poll31 voters

... Владимир Викторович

  1. Старк26%
  2. Ланнистер23%
  3. Аррен16%
  4. Талли10%
  5. Мартелл6%
  6. Грейджой6%
  7. Баратеон3%
  8. Тирелл0%
  9. Таргариен16%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 3 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Популярная культура” (@popculture_podcast), 141 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/popculture_podcast.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.