🆘 واقعی🆘 ❌❌برداشت امروز از بازی جدید ✅واریزی زیر ۱ دقیقه https://telegram.me/JacksFarm_bot?start=340061

Channel
پولدار شو
@pooldarasho
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
109subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001600056819 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pooldarasho |
| Description | گروه رفرال گیری و تبلیغات https://t.me/pooldarshoo13 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pooldarasho |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:31 | 109 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:25 | 109 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 27 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.83%
- avg views ÷ 109 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2.0
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (27 August 2024 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 2 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 283
- Videos
- 27
- Links
- 330
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
💥 خبر داغ از Gate.io، یکی از بهترین صرافیهای دنیا! ـGate.io توئیتی دربارهی ایردراپ جدید PAWS منتشر کرده! ولی چرا PAWS اینقدر مهمه؟ 🤔 این پروژه توسط ولادیمیر اسمرکیس، بنیانگذار بلوم، حمایت شده، و احتمال همکاریش با پروژههای 🪙ناتکوین و 🪙بلوم خیلی زیاده! بهعلاوه، PAWS به دیتابیس این دو پروژهی پرطرفدار، یعنی ناتکوین و داگز، دسترسی داره که شامل اطلاعات تعداد توکنهای دریافتی کاربران در هر دو پروژه است. 📊 و جال…
◽️🟠♨️ جواب نات پیکسل به بایننس : عالی 💎◽️ دوستان ربات نات پیکسل پروژه جدید نات کوین داره غوغا به پا میکنه ، در صورتی که نات پیکسل در 🟠 بایننس لیست بشه ، شاهد حجم سرمایه بسیار بالایی خواهیم بود . ◽️⭕️ به هیچ عنوان این فرصت طلایی رو از دست ندید و همین الان شروع به استخراج پیکسل کنید . 🪙🐶 هنوزم خیلیا سر فرصتی که داشتن برای استخراج نات کوین و داگز دارن حسرت میخورن . 😂 ورود به ربات نات پیکسل ➡️ ✅ ادلیست پروژه ✉️ @pu
پولدار شو pinned a photo
😺 ربات Cats تیک آبی گرفت✅️ 🤑 کارکرد این ربات دقیقا شبیه ربات داگز هست که امروز هم اعتبارش توسط تلگرام تایید شد 💵تاریخ لیستینگ بزودی اعلام میشه 🐈⬛ورود به ربات کتز @pultoken
🎩 سه روز دیگه تا پایان فاز ماینینگ ربات ماسک امپایر ‼️ 🔴 بعد از این زمان شما دیگه نمیتونید امتیاز بگیرید و طبق همون امتیازاتی که گرفتید میزان پاداش شما مشخص میشه ✅ ماسک امپایر کد ویدیو ها 👇👇👇 https://t.me/PulToken/618 @pultoken ✉️ @qpcod
پولدار شو pinned a photo
❌🎁الان ۶۰ هزار NFT ماسک امپایر فروخته شده است و ربات ماسک امپایر به هواداران خودش این امید را داده است که پاداش خوبی در نهم مهر ماه بدست می آورند و گفته اگر ایردراپ های دیگر شما را ناامید کرده اند امپایر ورق همه چیز را برمی گرداند. این بازی قرار است در چند روز دیگر فصل اولش به پایان برسد و پاداش دهی خودش را آغاز کنید. ✅✅ورود به ربات ماسک https://t.me/empirebot/game?startapp=hero6789355061 @pultoken
😺 ربات Cats تیک آبی گرفت✅️ 🤑 کارکرد این ربات دقیقا شبیه ربات داگز هست که امروز هم اعتبارش توسط تلگرام تایید شد 💵تاریخ لیستینگ بزودی اعلام میشه 🐈⬛ورود به ربات کتز @pultoken
😺 ربات Cats تیک آبی گرفت✅️ 🤑 کارکرد این ربات دقیقا شبیه ربات داگز هست که امروز هم اعتبارش توسط تلگرام تایید شد 💵تاریخ لیستینگ بزودی اعلام میشه 🐈⬛ورود به ربات کتز @pultoken
✊ بعد از ناتکوین ربات Coub به صورت رسمی توسط داگز نیز تایید شد 🔴 ربات Coub تصمیم گرفته توکن خودشو یعنی COUB$ رو به ارزش 2 میلیون دلار به عنوان پاداش بده به هرکسی که یکی از سه توکن داگز ، نات کوین و یا تون رو توی کیف پولش نگهداری میکنه ✔️ کلا ۱۴ روز وقت داره اگر دارید از دستش ندید و با اتصال کیف پول خود، روزانه سهم خودتونو بگیرید، علاوه بر اون کلی تسک هم داره ورود به ربات Coub ➡️ ✈️ @pultoken
اگر نات کوین ، تون و یا داگز داخل کیف پول خودتون دارید این پست مخصوص خودتونه 😁 🔴 ربات Coub تصمیم گرفته توکن خودشو یعنی COUB$ رو به ارزش 2 میلیون دلار به عنوان پاداش بده به هرکسی که یکی از این سه توکن رو توی کیف پولش نگهداری میکنه دقت کنید که این ربات توی کانال رسمی نات کوین معرفی شده 💎 ✔️ اگر دارید از دستش ندید و با اتصال کیف پول خود، روزانه سهم خودتونو بگیرید. کلا ۱۴ روز وقت داره و کلی تسک هم داره که میتونین از …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pooldarasho. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 753,849 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@PulToken · 5617 postsBlum
@BlumCryptoBot · 266,7024 postsCats 🐈⬛
@catsgang_bot · 123,4333 postsX Empire
@empirebot · 41,0432 postsMajor
@major · 351,5642 postsJack's Farm
@JacksFarm_bot · 619,8521 postNotcoin
@notcoin_bot · 585,5431 postNot Pixel
@notpixel · 45,3961 postدرآمد دلاری | گیفت تلگرام | کریپتو
@qpcod · 190,9031 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@pooldarasho named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“پولدار شو” (@pooldarasho), 109 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pooldarasho.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.