Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Помогите мне это развидеть

Channel

Помогите мне это развидеть

@pomogiterazvidet

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

937subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002981428737
TypeChannel
Username@pomogiterazvidet
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pomogiterazvidet

Growth

9359379367 August 2026 — 935 subscribers8 August 2026 — 935 subscribers8 August 2026 — 936 subscribers16 August 2026 — 937 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 9 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 935–937 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 06:08937+1
8 Aug 2026, 13:30936+1
8 Aug 2026, 00:50935no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:41935first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
44.3%
avg views ÷ 937 subscribers
Avg views / post
415
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held19 (1 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total7,891
Reactions total407
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 00:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

407 reactions across 19 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍13432.9%
🔥12330.2%
🤣4410.8%
😁317.62%
307.37%
👏102.46%
🤪102.46%
💯81.97%
🤩51.23%
🤔40.983%
🥴40.983%
🤯30.737%
💔10.246%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 407reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 19:38 UTC150 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Работа Пабло Пикассо "Сладость", 1903 год, холст, масло. Всем приятного вечера! 😊

🔥5👍3

7 Aug 2026, 10:52 UTC285 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Работа немецкого художника Франца фон Штука "Диссонанс", 1910 год, холст, масло.

🤣11👍42🔥2😁2

7 Aug 2026, 07:28 UTC267 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

С добрым утром, мои дорогие! Вышивка на пяльцах от мастерицы Татьяны Рукодайной.

🔥18🤣4👍2

6 Aug 2026, 17:50 UTC301 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Работа французского художника Жерара Шлоссера "О чём ты думаешь?", 1972 год, холст, акрил. Доброго вечера, друзья!

👍163

6 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC283 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @pophistoryPhoto

Мы часто думаем о средневековой литературе как о чем-то либо очень благочестивом, либо уж на крайний случай — куртуазном. Рыцари там со своими стихами, розами и прекрасными дамами. Дабы развеять этот миф, позвольте вас познакомить с недавно обнаруженным стишком под названием "Шип розы" (в оригинале Der Rosendorn. Завязка типична для куртуазной литературы: лирический герой попадает в заветный сад. Там он невольно под

🔥20👍31👏1

6 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC351 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Из серии "Шедевры отечественного боди-арта". Автор тату неизвестен. 😁

🤣21👍5

6 Aug 2026, 10:10 UTC342 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

После инсталляции самое время обратится к творчеству современных скульпторов. Точнее скульпторок. Работа Сары Лукас с загадочным названием "Deep Cream Maradona", 2016 год. Находится в Экеберг-парке, Осло. Наслаждайтесь... 😁

🤪9🔥4😁3👍2🤔1

6 Aug 2026, 08:20 UTC322 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Инсталляция французского художника Шарля Петилльона "Семейные воспоминания", 2012 год. Автор заполнил внутреннее пространство старого коттеджа белыми воздушными шарами. Таким образом художник попытался визуализировать свое представление о детских воспоминаниях, семейных традициях и эмоциональных связях... 🎈 Кстати, о Шарле Петилльоне я уже писал ранее на своем сайте.

👍84🔥2💔1

4 Aug 2026, 20:10 UTC325 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @BulatovDmitryPhoto

Бенедиктинский монах Константин Африканский (ок.1015-1087) ввел в обиход форму публичной исповеди, когда кающиеся открывали свои грехи перед всей общиной и одновременно предъявляли Церкви образцы своей мочи. Константин пребывал в уверенности, что по факту "разлития чёрной желчи в моче" можно выявить душевную болезнь и избавить кающегося от тягостных мыслей. Нам неизвестно, приходило ли в голову монаху Константину то,

🔥8🤣8👏7🤯3

4 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC368 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Немного сказочного сюрреализма в ленту... 🧙‍♂ Работа американского художника Тодда Шорра (1954 г. р.) "Диана сражается с волшебником иррациональной эстетики", 2014 год.

🔥14👍2👏2🤪1

4 Aug 2026, 10:14 UTC400 views37 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В определенном возрасте любая звезда становится похожа на Людмилу Гурченко. 😁 На фото: обложка журнала "Interview" с фотосессией Мадонны.

😁24💯8🔥4👍1

3 Aug 2026, 09:27 UTC399 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Кто автор этой работы?

  1. Борис Клевогин8%
  2. Александр Петров23%
  3. Евгений Тонких19%
  4. Михаил Берзинг26%
  5. Виталий Мягков24%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @pomogiterazvidet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Aug 2026, 09:27 UTCAnonymous Quiz84 voters

Кто автор этой работы?

  1. Борис Клевогин8%
  2. Александр Петров23%
  3. Евгений Тонких19%
  4. Михаил Берзинг26%
  5. Виталий Мягков24%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Помогите мне это развидеть” (@pomogiterazvidet), 937 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pomogiterazvidet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.