Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Полностью на русском

Channel

Полностью на русском

@polnrus

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8,720subscribers

-249 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001224961005
TypeChannel
Username@polnrus
DescriptionЗдесь будут дублироваться сообщения с канала - @engslov, но только полностью на русском языке 🥇 Продвигаем бренды, политические компании и предпринимателей под ключ. https://blog-activ.ru/
Created21 September 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/polnrus

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 4 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 5 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@usaBlog/60928 Nov 2025, 09:26 UTC@polnrus/2794 · this entry28 Nov 2025, 10:02 UTC1.0036 minutes
@usaBlog/6105 Dec 2025, 18:22 UTC@polnrus/2796 · this entry26 Dec 2025, 12:34 UTC1.0021 days
@usaBlog/61110 Dec 2025, 16:30 UTC@polnrus/2795 · this entry10 Dec 2025, 20:34 UTC1.004.1 hours
@polnrus/2799 · this entry3 Apr 2026, 10:01 UTC@usaBlog/6144 Apr 2026, 10:24 UTC1.0024 hours
@usaBlog/6185 May 2026, 07:17 UTC@polnrus/2802 · this entry5 May 2026, 07:18 UTC1.0072 seconds
@usaBlog/62018 May 2026, 13:25 UTC@polnrus/2804 · this entry19 May 2026, 06:33 UTC1.0017 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@usaBlog7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0044 minutes@usaBlog (5–2)
@forbes20256 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0025 minutes@forbes2025 (5–1)
@forbes_blog6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0044 minutes@forbes_blog (4–2)
@zapwork16 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.004 dayseven

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 17 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 31 October 2025 to 22 July 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 5 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @polnrus — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 5 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

8,7208,9698,844.56 August 2026 — 8,969 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,967 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,959 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,952 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,937 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,930 subscribers23 August 2026 — 8,916 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,910 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,904 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,896 subscribers6 September 2026 — 8,884 subscribers11 September 2026 — 8,878 subscribers15 September 2026 — 8,869 subscribers25 September 2026 — 8,844 subscribers4 October 2026 — 8,826 subscribers10 October 2026 — 8,811 subscribers14 October 2026 — 8,806 subscribers17 October 2026 — 8,801 subscribers20 October 2026 — 8,785 subscribers24 October 2026 — 8,776 subscribers27 October 2026 — 8,768 subscribers30 October 2026 — 8,763 subscribers1 November 2026 — 8,752 subscribers4 November 2026 — 8,747 subscribers7 November 2026 — 8,739 subscribers10 November 2026 — 8,720 subscribers6 August 202610 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 96 days, net -249. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,683–9,006 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 06:588,720-19
7 Nov 2026, 03:218,739-8
4 Nov 2026, 13:098,747-5
1 Nov 2026, 17:468,752-11
30 Oct 2026, 00:478,763-5
27 Oct 2026, 00:298,768-8
24 Oct 2026, 03:058,776-9
20 Oct 2026, 17:168,785-16
17 Oct 2026, 22:468,801-5
14 Oct 2026, 12:508,806-5
10 Oct 2026, 18:208,811-15
4 Oct 2026, 21:378,826-18
25 Sept 2026, 15:188,844-25
15 Sept 2026, 03:198,869-9
11 Sept 2026, 04:368,878-6
6 Sept 2026, 17:208,884-12
2 Sept 2026, 06:148,896-8
30 Aug 2026, 07:378,904-6
26 Aug 2026, 23:088,910-6
23 Aug 2026, 15:468,916first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 31 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.90%
avg views ÷ 8,720 subscribers
Avg views / post
253
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
5
of 33 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held33 (31 October 2025 – 8 November 2026)
Views total1,263
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 00:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈68
Links
≈2,580

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 5 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 11:17 UTC160 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Хороших мальчиков жизнь гладит по голове. Иногда — лопатой. Ты никого не хочешь обидеть. Всегда входишь в положение, уступаешь, соглашаешься. Тебя называют добрым, воспитанным и надёжным. Прекрасный набор качеств для человека, на которого можно повесить чужую работу, испортить ему выходные и ещё получить благодарность. Я написал «Скромным здесь не место» для тех, кто устал быть бесплатным приложением к чужим желани…

6 Nov 2026, 11:55 UTC174 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Тебя так долго учили быть хорошим, что ты забыл, чего хочешь. Хороший сын должен. Хороший муж обязан. Хороший сотрудник не подводит. Хороший друг всегда поможет. Хороший человек поймёт, потерпит, уступит и желательно ещё поблагодарит за возможность. Прекрасная система воспитания. Особенно для всех, кроме тебя. К сорока годам можно заработать деньги, построить карьеру, обзавестись семьёй и однажды обнаружить, что пол…

1 Nov 2026, 09:55 UTC266 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Вы не хороший человек. Вы просто всем удобны. Вы всегда помогаете, соглашаетесь, входите в положение и боитесь кого-нибудь разочаровать. Родственники довольны. Начальник счастлив. Друзья знают, кому звонить, когда у них очередная жопа. А вы постепенно превращаетесь в бесплатную службу решения чужих проблем. Самое смешное, что вам ещё и приятно, когда говорят: «Что бы мы без тебя делали?» Хотя правильный вопрос давно…

21 Oct 2026, 07:05 UTC350 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🐈 Кафе, в котором знают, когда ты придёшь в последний раз Представьте уютное кафе, куда хочется возвращаться. За окном дождь, внутри пахнет горячим хлебом, толстый кот Фунт оккупировал чужое пальто, а за стойкой спорят о том, сколько чеснока положить в суп. Здесь нет волшебников, привидений и порталов. Только кассовый аппарат, который иногда печатает на чеке два лишних слова. И почему-то после этого люди действитель…

19 Oct 2026, 07:40 UTC313 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Есть книги, которые рассказывают историю. А есть книги, после которых ты начинаешь чуть внимательнее смотреть на собственную жизнь. «Кот из отдела возвратов» начинается почти как странная офисная история: склад, возвраты, люди, которые приносят вещи обратно, и кот, который почему-то садится именно на те коробки, где человек говорит не всю правду. Но довольно быстро становится понятно, что возвращают здесь не покупки…

8 Oct 2026, 06:16 UTC385 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

У каждого большого решения есть второй ценник На первом написано: квартира — 20 миллионов. Машина — 5. Образование — миллион. На втором ценника нет. Там годы работы, проценты, потерянный доход, невозможность переехать, время в дороге, зависимость от следующей зарплаты и цена момента, когда вы захотите передумать. Именно про второй ценник книга «Дорогие решения». Она не рассказывает, как правильно жить. Она делает в…

2 Oct 2026, 14:00 UTC386 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Книга вышла и легла на склад: как предпринимателю встроить ее в продажи за 90 дней Книга вышла, но сама в продажи не пойдет. План на 90 дней: кому передавать экземпляры, что считать результатом и как не превратить тираж в мебель Источник: © Т-Бизнес секреты

18 Sept 2026, 01:05 UTC508 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🔥 Большинство читает книги неправильно. Поэтому толку от них — почти ноль. Можно проглотить сотню книг, забить заметки цитатами и всё равно остаться ровно там же, где был. В этом выпуске разбираем чтение без священного трепета и книжного фетишизма. — 📚 какие книги действительно стоят потраченных часов — 🧠 почему прочитанное выветривается из головы через неделю — ⚡ как читать так, чтобы книга хоть что-то изменила, к…

31 Aug 2026, 11:10 UTC576 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Иногда человеку не нужен второй шанс. Ему нужно несколько часов Савва видел слишком много людей, уверенных, что именно этой ночью надо всё закончить. Самое смешное — когда-то он тоже был уверен, что лучше других знает, как им следует жить. Только тогда Савва был не барменом, а хранителем. Однажды он вмешался в чужую судьбу — и за это получил бар, в котором теперь должен смотреть, как люди принимают решения сами. «Б…

23 Aug 2026, 10:32 UTC466 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Иногда правда приходит слишком поздно Представьте, что через сорок лет вам приносят письмо, которое должно было изменить вашу жизнь. Вы открываете его. И узнаёте, что человек, которого вы ненавидели, пытался сказать правду. Что брак мог не состояться. Что обвинение было ложным. Что отец приходил, но его не пустили. Что кто-то однажды решил за вас — из любви, страха или обыкновенного желания управлять. Станет ли ва…

20 Aug 2026, 06:10 UTC421 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Автобус №0 не ходит по расписанию. Он появляется у тех, кто слишком долго тащит чужую вину — или слишком удобно раздаёт свою другим. У каждого пассажира билет. На нём всего два пункта: «МОЁ» и «НЕ МОЁ». Ошибёшься — можешь потерять чужую память, собственную жизнь или возможность выйти на следующей остановке. А потом в автобус входит девушка, чью историю главный герой когда-то превратил в материал для своей книги. «Н…

16 Aug 2026, 09:44 UTC488 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

В пункт возвратов принесли коробку без номера. Внутри оказался чёрно-белый кот, старая книга учёта и странная запись: «Причина возврата — не подошёл себе». Кот по имени Штрих ложится только на те вещи, которые люди возвращают по ложной причине. Платье «не подошло», потому что женщина испугалась снова почувствовать себя красивой. Микрофон оказался «некачественным», потому что мужчина не смог сказать сыну, что скучает…

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @polnrus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Полностью на русском” (@polnrus), 8,720 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/polnrus.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.