Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TattooPollyGirl

Channel

TattooPollyGirl

@pollybat

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

178subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002359148135
TypeChannel
Username@pollybat
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded15 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/pollybat

Growth

176179177.515 August 2026 — 176 subscribers15 August 2026 — 177 subscribers23 August 2026 — 178 subscribers30 August 2026 — 179 subscribers9 September 2026 — 178 subscribers17815 August 20269 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 25 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 176–179 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 05:17178-1
30 Aug 2026, 01:34179+1
23 Aug 2026, 05:27178+1
15 Aug 2026, 16:22177+1
15 Aug 2026, 01:16176first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 18 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
41.9%
avg views ÷ 178 subscribers
Avg views / post
74.5
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
34.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held10 (18 July 202614 August 2026)
Views total149
Reactions total52
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 01:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
17s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

282 reactions across 10 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5619.9%
custom 53618186910821394825017.7%
🔥3512.4%
custom 53641626952537324133311.7%
custom 5460653550784772129134.61%
custom 5467706552804736591134.61%
💘134.61%
❤‍🔥124.26%
🥰124.26%
🍓113.90%
custom 535070116394147606982.84%
🐳82.84%
custom 537960944634955781572.48%
custom 544276974505087120451.77%
💔20.709%
🦄20.709%
👏10.355%
😁10.355%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 282 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
30
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 10 we hold a reading for · 90%
Most on one post
13
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pollybat. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 10:10 UTC55 views28 reactions2 Starsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🌟SNOW QUEEN🌟 #tattoo #snow #girl

🔥13custom 53618186910821394829❤‍🔥6

12 Aug 2026, 02:19 UTC94 views24 reactions2 Starsread 15 August 2026
Video

🦇меня устраивает быть собой🦇 🦇рисовать целыми сутками и не видеть белый свет🦇 #dnd #draw #шедоухарт #baldursgate3 #bg3

custom 5460653550784772129137🍓4

9 Aug 2026, 05:30 UTC139 views33 reactions4 Starsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🦇Смотрите, смотрите!🦇 Я всё лето периодически мучила куклу.🦇 📌Рассказываю: это была обычная базовая модель «Монстер Хай», вроде как призрак)) 📌Мой друг Алексей, услышав, что у меня уже был опыт росписи кукол, пожертвовал эту девочку из коллекции)) 📌Было непросто… Просто из‑за того, что Чич постоянно так или иначе косячил — деликатный процесс… Я сделала абсолютно всё! Волосы, кожа, платье… Прям всё‑всё… 📌Образ был при

custom 536416269525373241315custom 54677065528047365918custom 536181869108213948243❤‍🔥2🔥1

8 Aug 2026, 03:56 UTC144 views35 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
Photo

🐥 Санджи специально для Юленьки 🐥 #onepiece #ванпис #tattoo #новосибирск

🔥19custom 53507011639414760698🍓71

5 Aug 2026, 05:45 UTC163 views31 reactions2 Starsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Ловил на себе брезгливый взгляд астрального эльфа? 💎А сейчас?💎 #эльф #art #dnd #астральныйэльф

💘13custom 53618186910821394829custom 536416269525373241362😁1

4 Aug 2026, 08:45 UTC157 views21 reactions3 Starsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Хей Хей😮 Ну что!Кого нарисовать??? P.S. да даа я в отпуске и хочу нарисовать кого нибудь… пиши в коментах перса, а я нарисую🦇 #watercolor #акварель #отпуск

10custom 53618186910821394825custom 53641626952537324132custom 53796094463495578152❤‍🔥1🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 07:19 UTC147 views24 reactions2 Starsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🔫🔫🔫🔫🔫🔫🔫🔫 Элегантно подстрелила Дашку 🔫🔫🔫🔫🔫🔫🔫🔫

🥰12custom 537960944634955781553💔2🦄2

28 Jul 2026, 12:13 UTC219 views26 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
Photo

Акварель + Титановые белила📖 Порой приятно полистать зарисовки✅

13custom 53641626952537324136custom 53618186910821394824❤‍🔥3

22 Jul 2026, 14:27 UTC271 views39 reactions13 Starsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Давай послушаем Ozzy?? ДА ДААА!! Мышатки мои, с праздником вас!🦇🦇🦇🦇🦇 Сегодня! Официально! День Оззи Озборна!! Навеки в моем сердце и максимум лет 40 на моем теле…(у меня тоту с Оззи) 💙Увидимся в аду Принц Тьмы💙 P.S. ты только глянь какой подарок судьбы у меня в руках🩸 #ozzy #tattoopollygirl #оззи #оззиозборн #озборн

17🐳8custom 53618186910821394827custom 54677065528047365915👏1🔥1

18 Jul 2026, 14:29 UTC235 views21 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @dom_na_wodeeePhoto

✨✨magic day✨✨ (my birthday) ✨ph by @Anya_efi1 ✨tattoo by Полина

custom 536181869108213948212custom 54427697450508712045custom 53641626952537324134

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @pollybat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TattooPollyGirl” (@pollybat), 178 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pollybat.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.