Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
5 measurements spanning 56 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 135–138 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
2 Oct 2026, 19:58
135
-1
8 Sept 2026, 10:00
136
-1
23 Aug 2026, 01:23
137
-1
8 Aug 2026, 23:01
138
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:43
138
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 25 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4m 30s
Average length
1m 08s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
144 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5440718610404241986
47
32.6%
custom 5467626224031397564
39
27.1%
custom 5454420672769977742
21
14.6%
❤
18
12.5%
🔥
8
5.56%
custom 5454172406480399751
6
4.17%
custom 5472128440679295554
4
2.78%
🥰
1
0.694%
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 144 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2025 to 5 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 17 we hold a reading for · 47%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @polkovnikova_speak. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2025 to 5 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Не торопитесь ставить ёлку. ВЫ ТАК ПРОСИЛИ ПОВТОРИТЬ ДЕБАТЫ! В этот раз людей будет еще меньше. Пользы — больше.
17 декабря. 12.00
РАЗБОР - ДЕБАТЫ
Мы не будем просто говорить. Мы разберем 8 самых сложных случаев:
➖Эксперта, который в тупике
➖Предпринимателя с выгоранием, но упорством довести бизнес до ума
➖ Новичка, который не знает, с чего начать
➖Аса, застрявшего в своем потолке
(1 из 8 мест может стать вашим)…
Что в моей сумке на форумах?
Сегодня мы в Доброграде во Владимирской области на флагманской программе Росмолодежь. Предпринимай
В этом году я езжу очень много и ни разу не записывала такой формат, хотя всегда хотела))
Делюсь
Всего по чуть-чуть (тогда ваша любимая рубрика в комментах)41%
The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Оооох, как это было мощно!!! 5 часов на одном дыхании! Именно так прошли первые ДЕБАТЫ в Челябинске 🔥
Вас и нас с дебютом ❤️
Почему это вышло круто? Есть 5 причин
1. Мы продумали всеее до мелочей 🔥
Координатор, ведущий, кофе-брейк, фотозона, локация, аппаратура, навигация и атрибутика. Это позволило не думать НИ О ЧЕМ
2. Собрались самые крутые люди 🔥
Не просто так у нас был отбор. Честно, мы не выбирали, кто пой…
Всем привет!
Вчера была на ДЕБАТАХ -это новый формат для Челябинска.
Видно как организаторы Елена и Дарья вкладывались - энергия и организация 🔥оформление пушка конечно.
Я хочу познакомиться с участниками мероприятия, т.к вчера не удалось ко всем подойти.
Расскажите как вас зовут и чем вы занимаетесь?
Устроим и здесь небольшой нетворкинг, думаю всем будет полезно.
1 новость: в октябре начинается новый сезон психологического книжного клуба ОСОЗНАННОЕ ЧТЕНИЕ
Это клуб, который мы ведем в тандеме психолог + коуч
🍃4 встречи по субботам 8.00 (мск) онлайн в зум
🍃разбор книги с точки зрения психологии
🍃коучинговые техники на встрече + внедрение в жизнь с нашей обратной связью
🍃есть формат премиум, в который входит индивидуальная консультация на построение маршрутной карты на сближен…
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @polkovnikova_speak. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Всего по чуть-чуть (тогда ваша любимая рубрика в комментах)41%
The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2025 to 5 December 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дарья Полковникова | коуч-стратег | личный бренд” (@polkovnikova_speak), 135 subscribers as measured 2 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/polkovnikova_speak.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
