Channel
@politclub36
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
333subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001739165687 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @politclub36 |
| Created | 18 July 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/politclub36 |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 06:41 | 333 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 332 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:06 | 333 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:05 | 334 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:42 | 334 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:44 | 335 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 22 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
64 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 29 | 45.3% | |
| 😁 | 10 | 15.6% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 14.1% | |
| ❤ | 6 | 9.38% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 4.69% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 4.69% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 3.13% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 1.56% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 1.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 64 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2026 to 25 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
22 мая состоялось 109-е заседание Воронежского клуба политологов «Межэлитные коммуникации в стратегическом целеполагании современной России: результаты экспертных интервью». Результаты исследования представил член Экспертного клуба «Дигория», лектор Российского общества «Знание» Дмитрий Завирюхин. Основой политики являются взаимодействия элитных групп — «кому достается что, когда и как». Государство является лишь ме…
🔥4❤2😁2
Video message, posted without a caption
👍3
Video message, posted without a caption
👍3
Профессор кафедры истории философии и культуры ВГУ Сергей Рудаков: Главную роль в обществе играют не элиты, а народ. Самое важное - какие классы и социальные группы идут за элитными группами
😁4👍3
Профессор кафедры социологии и политологии ВГУ Александра Глухова: В настоящий момент для нашей страны ключевая задача - стратегическое целеполагание. В этой связи важно понимать кто принимает стратегические решения и как гражданские структуры могут повлиять на выработку стратегического курса.
😁3👍1
Руководитель ЦУР Воронежской области Андрей Черваков отмечает важность мотивации элит и ее качество. Устойчивость системы зависит от того, насколько заточены идейно лидеры и руководители
👍1🤔1🤯1
Депутат Белгородского городского Совета, заведующий кафедрой социологии и управления БГТУ им. В. Г. Шухова, профессор кафедры философии и теологии НИУ БелГУ, лектор общества «Знание» Михаил Игнатов: Как бы мы не рисовали внешнюю реальность, внутри она перемешана. Именно внешние акторы вносят изменения в тот или иной элитный контур. Поэтому любые границы управленческой активности элитных групп условны.
👍2
Video message, posted without a caption
👍3
Video message, posted without a caption
👍3
В основе межэлитных коммуникаций лежит понимание важности межличностных отношений. Человеческий фактор действительно может стать барьером в принятии решений, когда недоверие или нелояльность способствуют реализации государственной политики по принципу «итальянской забастовки». «Итальянская забастовка» (также известная как «работа по правилам» или work-to-rule) — это форма трудового протеста, при которой работники ст…
👍3
Video message, posted without a caption
👍3
Экспертно-аналитические сети обрамляют смыслы, понятные для общества и элит. Хотя экспертное сообщество действительно минимально участвует в реализации решений, тем не менее сохраняются каналы для их включения в стратегическое целеполагание: именно представители экспертно-аналитических сетей создают понятный политический язык, который легитимирует логику элит и позволяет обеспечить нормативное оформление стратегии.
❤2👌2🤯1😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @politclub36. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Воронежский клуб политологов” (@politclub36), 333 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/politclub36.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.