Channel
@polinabudnitski
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
275subscribers
+76 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001628372165 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @polinabudnitski |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/polinabudnitski |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Oct 2026, 03:16 | 275 | +9 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 16:40 | 266 | +1 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 07:39 | 265 | +7 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 09:01 | 258 | +46 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:29 | 212 | +15 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:44 | 197 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 199 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:04 | 199 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
73 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 37 | 50.7% | |
| 🔥 | 27 | 37.0% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 12.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Дело не в усталости. Неожиданно?🫨 Почти каждый, кто сталкивался с выгоранием, считатет причиной, что кончились силы, но при этом выспаться, съездить в отпуск, провести классные выходные не помогает)) Так почему же? А что если… Оно начинается тогда, когда заканчивается интерес к собственной жизни? И да, у выгорания есть простой алгоритм! ➡️ вы продолжаете работать ➡️ встречаться с друзьями и отвечать на сообщения …
❤5🔥2
Posted without readable text
Выгорание сейчас распространено настолько, насколько вам будет даже сложно представить… И это одна из тем, довольно часто поднимающихся в моем кабинете! Хочу понять статистику среди вас… 🫂
Тревожные люди читают сотни статей, смотрят психологов, ищут объяснение каждому своему состоянию Но спокойнее почему-то не становится. И не станет. И это просто объяснить 👉🏻 Эта мысль способна изменить то, как вы смотрите на свою тревогу: желание «понять» — это просто попытка наконец почувствовать контроль! В то время как проблема проблема не в нехватке информации, а в том, что невозможно контролировать жизнь насто…
👍8❤4🔥4
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥6❤2
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥6❤2
🫂
❤5
❤️Что забираете себе?
❤5🔥3
Чем хочется завершить мою мысль… Отпускание — это не пассивность и не отказ от целей, как кажется многим! Это состояние, в котором человек продолжает двигаться вперёд, но больше не строит всю свою жизнь вокруг одной-единственной развязки))) И, как ни парадоксально, именно в этом состоянии появляется гораздо больше свободы, гибкости и внутренних сил идти дальше! Именно про это и есть фраза «отпусти и все придет…»😉
❤5🔥3
Отпусти — и всё придёт? Хочу сегодня обсудить с вами парадокс отпускания, о котором говорил Карл Юнг. Чем сильнее мы чего-то хотим, тем больше начинаем об этом думать, переживать, контролировать, искать знаки, анализировать каждую мелочь… И очень часто именно в этот момент желаемое будто начинает отдаляться, замечали?… А потом наступает день, когда человек вдруг перестаёт за это цепляться не потому что ему стало …
❤5👍1🔥1
8 ЦИТАТ ПСИХОЛОГА ФИЛА СТАЦА, которые заставят вас взглянуть на жизнь иначе Что забираете себе в сегодня?🤍✨
❤4🔥2
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @polinabudnitski. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Полина, что делать? | психолог” (@polinabudnitski), 275 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/polinabudnitski.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.