Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ну товарищ полимеровна! | 18+

@polimerovna

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

234subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002535651227
TypeChannel
Username@polimerovna
DescriptionВсякого рода творчество :) Для связи/заказов: t.me/polimerovna?direct Анонимка: http://t.me/anonaskbot?start=kyd9565
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/polimerovna

Growth

2346 Aug 2026, 19:31 — 234 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 02:47 — 234 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 19:317 Aug 2026, 02:47
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 233–235 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 02:47234no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:31234first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
66.2%
avg views ÷ 234 subscribers
Avg views / post
155
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
25.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held11 (29 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,704
Reactions total435
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 02:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
719
Videos
44
Links
69

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

435 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
19945.7%
🔥10223.4%
custom 5413474696542850085327.36%
custom 5251418459408998240276.21%
🍓255.75%
🎉245.52%
🙏132.99%
🤔92.07%
💋40.92%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 435reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 10:13 UTC78 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ловлю эстафету от Фрола! 😊 Задача: собрать коллаж с эстетикой последнего сделанного вами персонажа ⭐ Передаю: Леди Aresser Emy 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟

🔥107custom 52514184594089982405🍓4custom 54134746965428500852

5 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTC104 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

В команде всё должно быть поровну: леди ополиморфилась, джентельмен умер от её рук (почти) 😇 Фотографы 📸 #atomicheart #cosplay #epiccon #НастяНазарова@polimerovna

custom 541347469654285008516🍓128🔥3💋1custom 52514184594089982401

3 Aug 2026, 08:12 UTC169 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вторая эстафета и тоже от Краснолюда! Условия такие: в центре Вы без образа, а вокруг вас ваши косплеи 😊 Эстафету передаю: Дуэт "Ты шо, пёс?" Шторм Фрол

20🔥13custom 52514184594089982405custom 54134746965428500852

3 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTC147 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Эстафета от Краснолюда Задача: сделать коллаж с эстетикой последнего сделанного персонажа 😺 Немного отступлю от правил и сделаю коллаж с героиней, работа над образом которой завершена на 85%. Уже скоро вы увидите мою версию Стефани!! 🤩 Ждёте?) Передаю эстафету: Alfeuse Solanxi Staffit

12🔥5custom 52514184594089982404custom 54134746965428500851

2 Aug 2026, 22:42 UTC130 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @frollcospPhoto

«Оно позади меня?» Бабайка на фоне: 🤩 Вчера с Полимеровной и Винтер снимали Красавицу и Бабайку, там такие кадры вкусные вышли батюшкииии 🤩 #косплей@frollcosp

17custom 54134746965428500855🙏4🔥2

2 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTC170 views53 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Хотела графические стрелки и макияж готического характера, но тяга к зелёному во мне снова победила 🐸 #makeup@polimerovna

25🔥13custom 525141845940899824010🍓4custom 54134746965428500851

1 Aug 2026, 10:40 UTC158 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026

а может окончательно сойти с ума и по приколу податься на игропром..

16🤔9🔥6

31 Jul 2026, 08:12 UTC194 views59 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Кто со мной на славянский рейв? 😏

29🔥14🎉12💋3🍓1

31 Jul 2026, 08:11 UTC176 views51 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мы такую красоту отсняли вчера, вы бы видели!! Башка в тине, jopa в клещах, модели и фотограф в восторге, всё по своим местам 😁 Немного кадров 👀

24🔥14🙏7🍓4custom 52514184594089982401custom 54134746965428500851

30 Jul 2026, 21:04 UTC189 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

14🔥6🙏2custom 52514184594089982401

29 Jul 2026, 08:55 UTC189 views59 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

До встречи на Старконе, выходит?) фото 📸

27🔥16🎉12custom 54134746965428500854

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @polimerovna. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 602,277 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ну товарищ полимеровна! | 18+” (@polimerovna), 234 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/polimerovna.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.