Channel
@poliforma
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,208subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002288881915 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @poliforma |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/poliforma |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:08 | 1,208 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:54 | 1,212 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:37 | 1,210 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 3 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (3 April 2026 – 19 July 2026) |
| Views total | 1,634 |
| Reactions total | 157 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 12:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
929 reactions across 19 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 8.50% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5449380056201697322 | 79 | 8.50% | |
| custom 5379600444098093058 | 53 | 5.71% | |
| custom 5292211874102811929 | 52 | 5.60% | |
| custom 5361741454685256344 | 41 | 4.41% | |
| custom 5424885441100782420 | 41 | 4.41% | |
| custom 5449759615346548186 | 39 | 4.20% | |
| custom 5427009714745517609 | 37 | 3.98% | |
| custom 5429583138890216820 | 36 | 3.88% | |
| custom 5431449001532594346 | 36 | 3.88% | |
| 🕊 | 36 | 3.88% | |
| custom 5467539229468793355 | 35 | 3.77% | |
| custom 5386494631112353009 | 32 | 3.44% | |
| custom 5445015510435502457 | 32 | 3.44% | |
| custom 5274091372721251387 | 30 | 3.23% | |
| custom 5451714942157724312 | 30 | 3.23% | |
| custom 5467387526928931399 | 30 | 3.23% | |
| custom 5377599075237502153 | 29 | 3.12% | |
| custom 5343824560523322473 | 27 | 2.91% | |
| custom 5375464961822695044 | 26 | 2.80% | |
| custom 5226945370684140473 | 25 | 2.69% | |
| 9 further kinds | 183 | 19.7% |
Custom emoji. 19 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 929reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 3 April 2026 to 19 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Guys! Сделал компанию таких ребят.Они почти ничего не делают(кроме того, что крутят головами в анимации) , но очень хорошо передают настроение. Есть счастливый, есть спокойный, есть тот самый, который уже устал ещё до начала дня(жизненно да?).А ещё я сделал из них эмодзи , можно даже себе как статус поставить) poli+random
custom 546738752692893139930custom 546537468191572740524
Поднимем актив на последнем посте? Если наберём хороший актив, до конца недели выпущу ещё один!
custom 544950595028307847422custom 537300131704210155215
Danseuse Хочу показать проект Danseuse, который я сделал вместе со своим куратором. Это модульные балерины-конструктор, вдохновлённые эстетикой стиля Мемфис. Каждую фигуру можно собирать по-разному, меняя её пластику и характер. Отдельное спасибо моему преподавателю за поддержку, доверие и фидбек! Полностью посмотреть проект можно по ссылке. Буду рад вашим реакциям! poli+mariinsky
custom 544975961534654818639custom 534382456052332247327
1k+1 Всем сап! Рад новым лицам, а ещё больше рад тому, что нас теперь уже больше тысячи! Для всех новых: у нас в канале принято ставить реакции на контент, а если очень нравится — то много реакций! Также вскользь напомню, что у меня есть инст. Посмотреть, что там, можно тут. poli+milestone
custom 542700971474551760937custom 542952860139548592224
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 542958313889021682020custom 536174145468525634417
🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩 🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩Собрали новую папку 🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩авторов, за которыми 🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩мы следим 🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩 ⠀
custom 536174145468525634424custom 542958313889021682016
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 529221187410281192923custom 527409137272125138716
Как ни крути, всегда poli. Большое спасибо Паше за этот чудесный кубик!
custom 529221187410281192929custom 527409137272125138714
Можем поднять актив по реакциям? Было бы супер!
custom 542488544110078242041custom 546746192864739967325
We're open and that's lovely! Всем Sup! Меня зовут Кира, многие из вас еще не знакомы со мной! Именно поэтому я открываю заказы: ведь это отличный способ познакомиться и реализовать ваши невероятные задумки под моим дирекшеном! С тем, что я творю, вы можете ознакомиться здесь и вот тут. @whitevirgil poli+you
custom 537960044409809305853custom 546753922946879335535
Svaleno(p1) Недавно через Артёма к нам обратился Тим. Он вместе с мамой делает бренд чармов ручной работы «свалено». Основной запрос был связан с охватами и узнаваемостью бренда. Нужно было сделать аккаунт более заметным и привести визуал к единой системе. Вместо привычной эстетики хендмейд брендов, мы построили айдентику на диджитал коллаже с элементами iOS интерфейса — и это работает на двух уровнях сразу. Во-перв…
custom 544938005620169732229custom 543365313579922896816
20+1 Сегодня мне 21. За этот год произошло невероятно много всего: создание канала, смена векторов, работа с самыми талантливыми людьми. Я хочу выразить благодарность всем тем, кто до сих пор является частью нашего сообщества. Знайте, что вы очень много значите для меня. С новым годом жизни я снова меняю концепцию. Все время я считал, что сила — в коннекте между людьми, именно поэтому теперь мы poli+, а это значит …
custom 544938005620169732250custom 522694537068414047325
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @poliforma. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 218,942 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@poliforma named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“poli+” (@poliforma), 1,208 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/poliforma.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.