Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

COMMNA

@commna

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,485subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001609288364
TypeChannel
Username@commna
Created26 February 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/commna

Growth

2,4842,4882,4866 August 2026 — 2,484 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,484 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,488 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,485 subscribers2,4856 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,483–2,489 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 20:562,485-3
9 Aug 2026, 15:312,488+4
6 Aug 2026, 09:322,484no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:232,484first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 5 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.0%
avg views ÷ 2,485 subscribers
Avg views / post
695
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held13 (5 May 20262 August 2026)
Views total1,390
Reactions total215
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
29s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,641 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🕊47028.6%
custom 546778310630182520736822.4%
🔥28317.2%
custom 540487803603206555526816.3%
custom 54744688156035397521649.99%
563.41%
custom 5472069938929763248291.77%
custom 545171494215772431230.183%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,641reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 5 May 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1,365
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 13 we hold a reading for · 85%
Most on one post
642
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @commna. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 May 2026 to 2 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 17:54 UTC574 views81 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

33custom 540487803603206555524🔥19🕊3custom 54744688156035397522

1 Aug 2026, 20:05 UTC816 views134 reactions4 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩🗾COMMASKA 🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩 Маннея, Иран. 🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩 VIII-VII в до н.э 🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩 34,6 х 31.2 см 🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩 ⠀✏️

🕊58custom 540487803603206555537custom 546778310630182520728🔥4custom 547446881560353975243

7 Jul 2026, 20:26 UTC≈1,810 views73 reactions4 Starsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 540487803603206555536custom 546778310630182520716🕊155custom 54744688156035397521

7 Jul 2026, 11:53 UTC≈2,200 views141 reactions642 Starsread 7 August 2026
Video

⠀ 🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩 ⠀ 🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩 COMDHVAJA ARTIFACT Начинаю воплощать свои CNDC-артефакты в реальной жизни. Модифицированный флаг Непала — первый живой CNDC-артефакт в коллекции, произведенный в единственном экземпляре! Он может стать твоим: достаточно просто поставить звездочки 🧩 под этим постом. Победитель: @heynetizen Каждому очень сильно благодарен!

custom 546778310630182520769🔥36custom 540487803603206555532🕊2custom 54744688156035397522

5 Jul 2026, 20:18 UTC≈2,060 views124 reactions102 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🧩 🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩 🧩🧩 🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩 🧩🧩🧩 🧩🧩🧩 Material: blackout 🧩🧩🧩 (240-274 g/m²) 🧩🧩🧩 🧩🧩 Height: 90 cm 🧩🧩 Length: 35 cm 🧩 Place: Nepal ✏️

🕊60custom 540487803603206555533custom 5467783106301825207291custom 54744688156035397521

15 Jun 2026, 12:30 UTC≈3,760 views195 reactions65 Starsread 7 August 2026

🧩 Нас 2000 🧩 Я благодарен КАЖДОМУ! Спасибо за ваше доверие и искреннее вовлечение в моё творчество! ЛЮБЛЮ ЛЮБЛЮ ЛЮБЛЮ 🧩

🔥93custom 546778310630182520751🕊492

14 Jun 2026, 14:36 UTC≈4,270 views113 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

🕊46custom 547446881560353975236custom 546778310630182520731

14 Jun 2026, 14:35 UTC≈12,800 views172 reactions25 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

СOMMNA'S Rubik 🧩 Нигде такого не видел, поэтому сделал собственную кастомную TGS-анимацию со сборкой кубика-рубика: для себя и своих друзей! Основной пак Комьюнити пак (Выдавал кубики за репост поста)

🕊77custom 540487803603206555548custom 546778310630182520737custom 547446881560353975282

4 Jun 2026, 13:51 UTC≈3,520 views129 reactions25 Starsread 7 August 2026

🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩 Уже как 4 года я каждый день работаю для того, чтобы делать мой проект масштабнее, красивее и интереснее. Я очень люблю создавать из чистой творческой энергии, вкладываться на максимум, и потому я ни на секунду не сомневаюсь, что впереди – большой, вдохновляющий, изобильный путь. Я очень рад и благодарен тому росту и отклику, который получаю от вас в последние полгода: все это время, благодаря вашей под

custom 547446881560353975264custom 540487803603206555531custom 5467783106301825207274🕊3

1 Jun 2026, 20:00 UTC≈3,520 views119 reactions80 Starsread 7 August 2026

Почувствуй себя сотрудником COMMA-NULL Documentation Center в интерактивном квесте. Quteee сделал в Blender лабораторию в стилистике CNDC, а я перенес ее на сайт и наполнил его интерактивными точками интереса, новыми документами и дополнительным контентом, чтобы вы могли почувствовать себя настоящими исследователем аномалии.🧩🧩 Ваша задача — восстановить пароль и взломать компьютер доктора Вэнса. Для этого вам нужн

🔥50custom 546778310630182520737🕊27custom 54744688156035397524custom 54048780360320655551

1 Jun 2026, 19:47 UTC≈5,650 views119 reactions330 Starsread 7 August 2026
Video

🗝🗝CNDC LABORATORY 3D 🗝 By @commna and @qut3e 🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝 🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝 🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝 🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝 🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝 🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝 🌎Visit site ✏️x ✏️

🕊52custom 546778310630182520735🔥29custom 54744688156035397523

22 May 2026, 21:16 UTC≈3,340 views129 reactions33 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🧩Colmala-pa biosystem, Nepal 🧩🧩🧩🧩🗾 CNDC-2012-NP.a 🧩🧩🧩🧩 улей Apis dorsata 🧩🧩🧩🧩 commnifera 🧩🧩🧩🧩 🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩 ⠀🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩 🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩🗾 Apis dorsata 🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩 commnifera 🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩 СNDC-подвид 🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩 гималайской пчелы 🧩🧩🧩 🧩🧩✏️

🔥52custom 547446881560353975239🕊30custom 54677831063018252078

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @commna. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 29,247 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“COMMNA” (@commna), 2,485 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/commna.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.