Channel
@poleanschi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
375subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001675109578 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @poleanschi |
| Created | 5 January 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/poleanschi |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Sept 2026, 14:14 | 375 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 377 | -3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:39 | 380 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 379 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:02 | 379 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
95 reactions across 6 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 39 | 41.1% | |
| 💯 | 18 | 18.9% | |
| 👍 | 17 | 17.9% | |
| 👏 | 10 | 10.5% | |
| 🤬 | 5 | 5.26% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 4.21% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.05% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 1.05% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 95 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📢 Протест против очередного тарифного шока, который готовит власть миллионеров. Столько людей у парламента не собиралось уже давно. Забавно, что Agora сумела разглядеть лишь несколько десятков участников. У них своя арифметика 😁
🔥10👍6💯3❤1😁1
Ткачук о деятельности НАРЭ: 40 миллионов евро они сожрали за пять с половиной лет Депутат парламента от партии "Гражданский конгресс" Марк Ткачук выступил на протесте перед зданием НАРЭ.
💯4🔥4👏3
📣 Отчитываюсь. Участвовали в протесте у НАРЭ. Марк Ткачук выступил. Рассказал, сколько сожрало НАРЭ за последние несколько лет — 40 миллионов евро! За что?! Собрать всех наших товарищей из ГК для коллективной фотографии так и не получилось — очень много народа пришло к роскошному зданию этого агентства. Тесно, громко, шумно. И это в рабочий день! Так всех достало лицемерие власти. Спасибо коллегам из партии ПРОМ за…
🔥11👍4❤3👏2
‼️ Гражданский конгресс присоединяется к протесту у НАРЭ против нового тарифного шока Партия Гражданский конгресс присоединится к акции протеста у здания НАРЭ, которая состоится 24 июля в 10:00. Мы поддерживаем инициативу депутата парламентской фракции «Альтернатива» и лидера Партии развития и объединения Молдовы Иона Кику и призываем все оппозиционные силы к солидарным действиям. Власти готовят гражданам очередной…
🔥7👏4💯2
⛽️ С 1 августа бензин и дизель в Молдове автоматически подорожают. НАРЭ включило в цену топлива новый сбор — 48 банов за литр. Средства будут направляться на создание государственных резервов топлива. НАРЭ пишет: «...Данное решение является необходимой мерой для укрепления безопасности поставок нефтепродуктов в Республике Молдова. Создание аварийных запасов позволит стране более эффективно реагировать на возможные п…
💯7🤬5👍2😢1
‼️ Полный зал оппозиции и известных экспертов — и пустые кресла правящей партии: так в парламенте обсуждали законопроект о демократизации выборов По инициативе депутата Гражданского конгресса Марка Ткачука в Парламенте прошла широкая публичная дискуссия о демократизации избирательного законодательства. Поводом стал разработанный оппозицией законопроект об изменениях в Избирательный кодекс. По замыслу авторов, эти из…
🔥7👍5💯2👏1
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @poleanschi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Михаил Полянский” (@poleanschi), 375 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/poleanschi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.