Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Poker Inside

Channel

Poker Inside

@pokerinside

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,204subscribers

+172 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002136386575
TypeChannel
Username@pokerinside
DescriptionПокерные новости, которые интересно читать Связь с админом: @SergMDD Чат: @PokerInsideChat
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/pokerinside

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (1 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@SafePoker_official/1671724 Aug 2026, 09:36 UTC@pokerinside/3220 · this entry24 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC1.002.8 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@SafePoker_official6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.001.6 hourseven

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 107 comparable posts for this entry, running 1 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

10,03210,31910,175.56 August 2026 — 10,032 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,032 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,122 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,165 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,231 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,268 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,264 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,266 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,270 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,248 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,251 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,249 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,254 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,258 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,259 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,256 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,248 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,250 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,253 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,252 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,250 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,248 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,242 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,238 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,286 subscribers7 September 2026 — 10,319 subscribers10 September 2026 — 10,308 subscribers12 September 2026 — 10,307 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,301 subscribers16 September 2026 — 10,300 subscribers18 September 2026 — 10,297 subscribers1 October 2026 — 10,273 subscribers6 October 2026 — 10,269 subscribers11 October 2026 — 10,267 subscribers14 October 2026 — 10,269 subscribers16 October 2026 — 10,266 subscribers17 October 2026 — 10,271 subscribers18 October 2026 — 10,280 subscribers19 October 2026 — 10,276 subscribers19 October 2026 — 10,279 subscribers20 October 2026 — 10,283 subscribers22 October 2026 — 10,281 subscribers23 October 2026 — 10,278 subscribers24 October 2026 — 10,274 subscribers25 October 2026 — 10,273 subscribers26 October 2026 — 10,268 subscribers27 October 2026 — 10,264 subscribers28 October 2026 — 10,257 subscribers29 October 2026 — 10,239 subscribers30 October 2026 — 10,237 subscribers31 October 2026 — 10,229 subscribers1 November 2026 — 10,227 subscribers2 November 2026 — 10,226 subscribers3 November 2026 — 10,220 subscribers4 November 2026 — 10,222 subscribers5 November 2026 — 10,221 subscribers6 November 2026 — 10,218 subscribers7 November 2026 — 10,210 subscribers9 November 2026 — 10,239 subscribers10 November 2026 — 10,204 subscribers10,2046 August 202610 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 96 days, net +172. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,989–10,362 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 13:5810,204-35
9 Nov 2026, 03:0710,239+29
7 Nov 2026, 19:1110,210-8
6 Nov 2026, 16:1610,218-3
5 Nov 2026, 16:0710,221-1
4 Nov 2026, 19:1510,222+2
3 Nov 2026, 17:4810,220-6
2 Nov 2026, 19:1010,226-1
1 Nov 2026, 18:1110,227-2
31 Oct 2026, 17:1510,229-8
30 Oct 2026, 13:5810,237-2
29 Oct 2026, 10:4910,239-18
28 Oct 2026, 06:1510,257-7
27 Oct 2026, 07:0110,264-4
26 Oct 2026, 04:1910,268-5
25 Oct 2026, 03:1610,273-1
24 Oct 2026, 03:2610,274-4
23 Oct 2026, 01:5110,278-3
22 Oct 2026, 02:0010,281-2
20 Oct 2026, 23:3710,283first reading

Engagement

153 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.8%
avg views ÷ 10,204 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,430
48 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
48
of 153 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held153 (1 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total116,420
Reactions total2,480
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 22:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,860
Videos
≈1,140
Links
≈2,510

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 41m
Average length
1m 53s

Measured directly from 54 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

7,964 reactions across 147 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3,20840.3%
🔥1,32216.6%
😁1,16714.7%
👌5787.26%
❤5036.32%
custom 52381306638187971924375.49%
💩4075.11%
👎3424.29%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 153 of the 153 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,364 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 153 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 153 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pokerinside. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 153 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 48 posts held from the last 30 days (6.25%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 16:20 UTC≈1,450 views30 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Кирилл #Marusia1980 одержал победу в баунти-турнире с байином 125$ 🏆 Стыдно в этом признаться, но вчера я сделал вывод, что топ 1 лучше занимать, чем топ2 ⚡️ PokerInside

👍24🔥5❤1

10 Nov 2026, 12:16 UTC≈1,680 views39 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

Процес вдохновился классической музыкой и выиграл выставление 🎼 Вы видели? Классическую музыку нужно только поставить. И все сразу она дает Смотреть на YouTube 📱 ⚡️ PokerInside

🔥16👍8❤5😁5👌4custom 52381306638187971921

10 Nov 2026, 08:11 UTC≈1,780 views33 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Катя #Картинка и Сергей #Горох запишут подкаст 🎙 На повестке дня: ⏺Реалии медиапокерных турниров ⏺Насколько сложно было обучаться с нуля ⏺Помогают ли юмор и харизма за покерным столом Смотреть и участвовать в конкурсе тут 👈 Старт в 15:00 мск ⚡️ PokerInside

👍18🔥7❤3💩3👌2

10 Nov 2026, 04:50 UTC≈1,990 views53 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Андрей #BabyShark рассказал об удалении всех своих каналов на YouTube 🥶 Самый большой (канал был) 130 000 подписчиков🙃 Ещё можно подать апелляцию (что я обязательно сделаю) и надеятся что разблокируют). Ситуация не из приятных, но я не волнуюсь (это для тех кто за меня переживает🤗) ⚡️ PokerInside

👍24👎8💩7🔥4❤3👌3😁3custom 52381306638187971921

9 Nov 2026, 16:41 UTC≈2,020 views41 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

#Marsline рассказал о благородстве оппонента в оффлайн кэш-игре 🙂 Я готовился сделать ставку и он говорит "Марсель, притормози". И сказал это по-дружески ⚡️ PokerInside

👍23❤8🔥6👌4

9 Nov 2026, 12:46 UTC≈2,100 views47 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Антон Sandr1x поделился принципом, лежащим в основе его стратегии 🧠 Коротко о моём подходе к выстраиванию стратегии ⚡️ PokerInside

😁17👍14🔥11custom 52381306638187971923❤2

9 Nov 2026, 08:54 UTC≈2,100 views37 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Сразу три российских игрока попали в топ4 турнира Triton Genesis 3,000$ 🏆 Виктор Кудинов был большим чиплидером, но в тримаксе проблефовал весь стек в будущего победителя, который вскрыл его три барреля по второй паре 🚬 ⚡️ PokerInside

👍24👌5❤4🔥4

9 Nov 2026, 04:37 UTC≈2,120 views62 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

Артём Redlleni3 попал в заварушку и имел только один прямой аут в шестерном аллине 😭 Победу пришлось добывать окольными путями ⚡️ PokerInside

👍28custom 523813066381879719214🔥6😁6❤3👌3💩2

8 Nov 2026, 16:00 UTC≈2,120 views35 reactions1 Starread 10 November 2026

Posted without readable text

👍16🔥8👌7❤3💩1

8 Nov 2026, 12:45 UTC≈2,120 views40 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

Никита #Бодяковский определил лучшего турнирного игрока в покер 🏆 ⚡️ PokerInside

👍27👌5🔥5😁2❤1

8 Nov 2026, 08:53 UTC≈2,140 views43 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

Артем #Винокур стал победителем медиапокерного турнира 🏆 В хедзапе он обыграл Амира #Гурбанова Нет!!! Нет, да нельзя делать "Похуй, колл" (с) VooDooSh ⚡️ PokerInside

🔥17👍12❤4👌3😁3custom 52381306638187971923💩1

8 Nov 2026, 05:07 UTC≈2,180 views39 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Покерный клуб #Сочи выпустил фильм "30 лет в игре" 🎬 История начинается в 1989 году, когда в Москве открывались первые казино, и охватывает три десятилетия развития офлайн-покера: бурные девяностые, покерный бум нулевых, переезд индустрии за границу и её возвращение в Россию. В фильме собрали редкие архивные фотографии, видеозаписи прошлых лет и даже кадры с телевизионного покерного стола 2005 года! Смотреть тут 📱 …

👍24🔥8❤5👌2

Showing the 12 most recent of 153 posts we hold for @pokerinside. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@pokerinside edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 November 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

SafePoker l Обучение и новости покера
@SafePoker_official · 19,460
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 1 October 2026
Блефач | Покер
@blefach · 20,049
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 30 September 2026
ПОКЕРОК
@pokerok_official · 48,377
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 25 September 2026
Миша Иннер - Покер с Про
@mishainner · 20,789
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Poker Inside” (@pokerinside), 10,204 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pokerinside.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.