Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ㅤ𝓹𝗈𝗂𝘀𝗼𝗻𝗈𝗎𝗌 𖤝 𝓻𝘰𝗌α𝗋𝑖𝖾𝗌

@poisonthorns

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

14subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003787664426
TypeChannel
Username@poisonthorns
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 8 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/poisonthorns

Growth

1411 Aug 2026, 20:47 — 14 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 01:46 — 14 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 20:4712 Aug 2026, 01:46
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13–15 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 01:4614no change
11 Aug 2026, 20:4714first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
239.3%
avg views ÷ 14 subscribers
Avg views / post
33.5
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026
Posts held20 (8 June 202625 July 2026)
Views total67
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 01:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
7
Videos
6
Links
5

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 28s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

25 Jul 2026, 10:44 UTC20 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @fmpublicrelations

ᅟ⁣⁣ᅟ⁣⁣ᅟ⁣⁣ᅟ⁣⁣ᅟ⁣⁣ᅟ⁣⁣ᅟᅟ⁣⁣ᅟ⁣⁣ᅟ⁣⁣ᅟ⁣⁣ᅟ⁣⁣ᅟ⁣⁣ᅟᅟ⁣⁣ᅟ⁣⁣ᅟ⁣⁣ᅟ⁣⁣ᅟ⁣⁣ᅟ⁣⁣ᅟ 🪞@fmpublicrelations 𝗏𝗂𝖺 𝗍𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗍𝖾𝗋. 🪞𝗢𝗨𝗥 𝗧𝗘𝗔𝗠 𝖠𝗇𝗇𝖺𝖻𝖾𝗅𝗅𝖾 𝖢𝖺𝗋𝗈𝗅𝗂𝗇𝖾 𝖣𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗅𝖾𝗋 (𝗳𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿) 𝖲𝖺𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗁𝖺 𝖩𝗈𝗁𝗇𝗌𝗈𝗇 (𝗰𝗼-𝗳𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿) 𝖠𝖽𝗂𝗅𝖾 𝖫𝖺𝗎𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍 (𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗴𝗶𝘀𝘁) 𝖩𝖾𝗇𝗇𝗂𝖿𝖾𝗋 𝖦𝗅𝖾𝗂𝗇𝗌𝖻𝖾𝗋𝗀 (𝗰𝗹𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝘀𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗶𝗰𝗲𝘀) 𝖫𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗇𝖺 𝖡𝗈𝗇𝗀𝗂𝗈𝗏𝖺𝗇𝗂 (𝗱𝗶𝗴𝗶𝘁𝗮𝗹 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗻𝗲𝗿) 𝖲𝖼𝗈𝗍𝗍 𝖢𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖾𝗋 (𝗺𝗮𝗿𝗸𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘀𝘁) 𝖠𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗈 𝖬𝖺𝗍𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗓𝗓𝗂 (𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗻𝘁 𝗰𝗼𝗼𝗿𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿) 𝖳𝗋𝖾𝖾 𝖯𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖾 (𝗣𝘂𝗯𝗹𝗶𝗰 𝗥𝗲𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀) 𝖨𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝖭𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗍𝖾 (𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗴𝗶𝘀

15 Jul 2026, 03:11 UTC53 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @nessasfilmVideo

Video, posted without a caption

15 Jul 2026, 02:41 UTC147 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ㅤ⠀ㅤ ㅤ ׂ 🩸 ˒˒‎ 𝓽𝗈𝗎𝗀𝗁 𝑙𝗈ѵ𝖾 ⠀ ⠀ㅤㅤ𝗇𝖾𝗐 𝘢𝘭𝘣𝘶𝘮 ᎓ 𝗈𝗎𝗍 𝐬𝖾𝗉 𝟐𝟓 ᵗʰ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀

15 Jul 2026, 02:40 UTC44 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🩸 🩸 🩸 🩸ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ㅤㅤ🩸 🩸🩸 𝗅𝗂𝗄𝖾𝖽 𝖻𝗒 𝗼𝗹𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗼𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗶𝗮 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗈𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗋𝗌. 🩸 𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗮𝗯𝗮𝗿𝗿𝗲𝘁𝘁 ᎓ “𝖳𝗈𝗎𝗀𝗁 𝖫𝗈𝗏𝖾” 𝗆𝗒 𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗋𝖽 𝖺𝗅𝖻𝗎𝗆 𝗂𝗌 𝗈𝗎𝗍 𝗌𝖾𝗉𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖻𝖾𝗋 25𝗍𝗁. 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖿𝗂𝗋𝗌𝗍 𝗌𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗅𝖾, “𝖳𝗈𝗈 𝖥𝖺𝗌𝗍 𝖳𝗈 𝖫𝗂𝗏𝖾, 𝖳𝗈𝗈 𝖸𝗈𝗎𝗇𝗀 𝖳𝗈 𝖣𝗂𝖾” 𝗂𝗌 𝗈𝗎𝗍 𝖿𝗋𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗒. 𝗉𝗋𝖾-𝗈𝗋𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗒𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗇𝗈𝗐 𝗑𝗑 💋 🩸 𝗅𝗈𝖺𝖽 𝖺𝗅𝗅 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗌 • 🩸 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝗅𝖺𝗍𝖾.

15 Jul 2026, 02:39 UTC32 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @fmpublicrelationsPhoto

ᅟ⁣⁣ᅟ⁣⁣ᅟ⁣⁣ᅟ⁣⁣ᅟ⁣⁣ᅟ⁣⁣ᅟᅟ⁣⁣ᅟ⁣⁣ᅟ⁣⁣ᅟ⁣⁣ᅟ⁣⁣ᅟ⁣⁣ᅟᅟ⁣⁣ᅟ⁣⁣ᅟ⁣⁣ᅟ⁣⁣ᅟ⁣⁣ᅟ⁣⁣ᅟᅟ⁣⁣ᅟ⁣⁣ᅟ⁣⁣ᅟ⁣⁣ᅟ⁣⁣ᅟ⁣⁣ᅟ 🌟 𝖥𝖤𝖠𝖱𝖫𝖤𝖲𝖲 𝖬𝖤𝖣𝖨𝖠 𝖯𝖱 💜 𝗠𝗨𝗦𝗜𝗖 💜 “Tough Love”, Nessa Barrett’s third album, out September 25th. Lead single “Too Fast To Live, Too Young To Die” out this friday 💜𝖿𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗹𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗺𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗮𝗽𝗿.𝗰𝗼𝗺

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @poisonthorns. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 828,165 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ㅤ𝓹𝗈𝗂𝘀𝗼𝗻𝗈𝗎𝗌 𖤝 𝓻𝘰𝗌α𝗋𝑖𝖾𝗌” (@poisonthorns), 14 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/poisonthorns.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.