Channel
@poisk_rods
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
365subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001281579777 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @poisk_rods |
| Created | 6 November 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/poisk_rods |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:02 | 365 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:32 | 364 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:57 | 364 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 November 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 February 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
39 reactions across 12 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 20 | 51.3% | |
| 😢 | 15 | 38.5% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 10.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 November 2021 to 16 February 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 8 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 27 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
Управлять каналом и группой, выполнять поиск, работать с базами пока не могу, я в длительной "командировке" без компьютера, интернета и смартфона.
Ухожу на неопределённый срок, публикаций пока не будет.
😢15👍2
Встретил такой спам в одной группе. Жесть и по срокам и по цене. У нас одна выборка 100 руб. всего, даже если в выборке будут сотни человек.
👍3
https://familio.media/about-genealogy/kak-sdelat-zaprosy-v-fsb-i-mvd/?utm_source=insta&utm_medium=media&utm_campaign=kak-sdelat-zaprosy-v-fsb-i-mvd
Особенности базы "Избиратели-2006". Эта база позволила мне найти несколько новых родственников, которых не было в базах ИНН-2003-2005. Ещё одно преимущество для тех, кто жил в Украине на момент формирования баз, но родился за пределами Украины. В ИНН-2003-2005 для таких людей указана только страна рождения, а в "Избирателях-2006" указано место рождения (страна, область, район, населённый пункт). Правда, такое ощущен…
Из неудобств ИНН-2004 (2003): затруднён поиск по ФИО на русском языке. После ввода, например, имени на русском, открывается справочник имён, и там нужно искать и выбирать имя на русском, и там оно не одно, а несколько, например несколько Андреев и нужно попробовать всех троих. Также с фамилией и отчеством, бывает и гораздо больше вариантов нужно перебрать. А в базе ИНН-2005 Ф, И, О на украинском и на русском записаны…
👍2
Офицеры русской императорской армии 1900-1917 г., в том числе Георгиевские кавалеры и другие: https://www.ria1914.info Личных карточек в базе: 77 531.
👍2
Конечно, для генеалогии полезнее работать с более ранними базами, чем ИНН-2005, ИНН-2003, Избиратели-2006, но в более ранние периоды компьютеров не было и потому такие базы не велись. А оцифровка архивов ведётся только тех, которые могут быть полезны для гос. структур, либо представляют какую-то историческую ценность. Для гос. структур, к сожалению, не представляют интерес списки жителей давно прошедших годов, пенсио…
👍3
Можно ли найти своих родственников по базам ИНН не имея никаких других зацепок? Нет. В базах ИНН не указываются родственные связи, как это могло бы быть в базах ЗАГС. Единственный способ точно определить родственную связь - по адресу. Например, если несколько человек с одной фамилией проживают по одному адресу, то это, скорее всего, одна семья. И дальше, если по одному и тому же адресу у людей с одной фамилией отчест…
👍2
Почему в базах ИНН есть не все люди (ИНН Украина 2005, 2003). ИНН в Украине начали выдавать с 31.05.1996, но выдали не сразу всем, этот процесс занял какое-то время, может несколько лет. Поэтому, если человек дожил до 2001 года и не попал в базу, значит до него ещё не дошла очередь в налоговой и он не успел при жизни получить ИНН. В 1996 г. ИНН только начали выдавать, а когда выдали всем - неизвестно. Поэтому, в база…
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @poisk_rods. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Находили ли ваше генеалогическое дерево, опубликованное в интернете ваши родственники и обращались ли к вам по поводу этого дерева?
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Вы находили в интернете готовые генеалогические деревья родственников?
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Удавалось ли вам получать бесплатно из архивов полезную информацию о своих предках/родственниках, когда делали письменные запросы в архив?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Сколько, примерно, персон у вас внесено на familio.org?
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 November 2021 to 16 February 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Поиск родственников” (@poisk_rods), 365 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/poisk_rods.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.