Channel
@podvalvample
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
89subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002272206143 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @podvalvample |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/podvalvample |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 00:02 | 89 | +1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 08:22 | 88 | +2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:12 | 86 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:49 | 86 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
416 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 187 | 45.0% | |
| 🔥 | 103 | 24.8% | |
| 💘 | 51 | 12.3% | |
| custom 5429568600425904850 | 49 | 11.8% | |
| custom 5240084946952933680 | 19 | 4.57% | |
| custom 5447316543459305908 | 6 | 1.44% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.24% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 416 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вкусы моих кровосись: • Клубничное полито горьким шоколадом • Ванильное с шоколадной крошкой • Фисташковое с белым шоколадом • Кофе с карамелью • Трюфельное • Персиковое • Ореховое с бананом • Черничное • Яблочный пирог Ваших: • Малиновое • Ежевичное • Лакрица и можжевельник • Лимонное с шоколадом P.s. Вкусы могут повторяться, но не прям такие же ( пример: кофе с карамелью 👉 соленая карамель)
custom 54295686004259048507❤4💘1
Видос будет скорее как памятка для тех, кто захочет создать себе оса в этот мир 👈 Эти 6 мин дались мне крайне тяжко, но я надеюсь эта инфа будет полезна P.s. Потом буду делать отдельные видосы по лору уже самих персов (надеюсь)
💘3custom 54295686004259048503
А еще капкут отказывается нормально работать на моем калькуляторе, поэтому мега монтажа не будет Хорошо, если вообще смогу закончить видос🥲
❤3custom 54295686004259048503💘1😭1
Скетчик с Нином🙌 Страдала, рисуя ручкой (10 в 1, она толстая и неудобная) от лангуо и только в конце поняла, что можно пасту переставить в другую нормальную ручку🤡 #кровосиси
❤14custom 54473165434593059084💘3🔥1custom 52400849469529336801custom 54295686004259048501
Напоминаю: Афелий тащит в рот все, что вкусно выглядит/пахнет Я его понимаю, тоже хочу съесть Нина😔 P.s. хорошо, что Нин не использует свою способность🙂 #кровосиси
❤12🔥6custom 52400849469529336804💘1
И последний трейдик✨️✨️✨️ Постаралась отрисовать всех персонажей вкусно🤌 Теперь можно вернуться к кровосисям🤗
❤12🔥6custom 54295686004259048502custom 54473165434593059082
Шестой трейдик для чертенка Очень понравилось рисовать этот арт🤗❤️
❤14💘6🔥6custom 52400849469529336801
Пятый трейдик для чертенка Черный цвет мне тяжело дается...
🔥17custom 54295686004259048509❤6custom 52400849469529336804
В будущем планирую сделать видосы по кровосисям. По ним легче усвоить инфу и зашарить за лор, чем текстом, вроде как (Хотя я лох в таком, еле в капкуте могу натыкать че то🥲, но я постараюсь) И первый скорее всего будет про их вселенную👈 (может даже захотите создать своего вампиреныша🤗) ⁉️Какие вопросы у вас есть по ней?
custom 54295686004259048509🔥4❤3💘1
Всего 7 трейдов в итоге👈 Так что еще 3 и вернусь к своим детям🫡
💘7
Четвертый трейдик для чертенка Тоже кровосися😈 кайф Да, мне лень рисовать обувь, так что у всех голые пятки✌️
❤13🔥8💘3
Третий трейдик для арбузика Кровосись!!! (Он тут лежит👈) Пока не могу понять как в этом стиле лучше красить волосы🤔
❤15🔥8custom 54295686004259048506💘1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @podvalvample. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Подвал Вампл” (@podvalvample), 89 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/podvalvample.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.