Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ПОДСЛУШАНО АРТКОММЬЮНИТИ

Channel

ПОДСЛУШАНО АРТКОММЬЮНИТИ

@podslyshanoartcm

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

766subscribers

+128 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003843173748
TypeChannel
Username@podslyshanoartcm
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/podslyshanoartcm

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6387667026 August 2026 — 638 subscribers6 August 2026 — 638 subscribers14 August 2026 — 659 subscribers22 August 2026 — 721 subscribers30 August 2026 — 747 subscribers7 September 2026 — 758 subscribers15 September 2026 — 766 subscribers6 August 202615 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 40 days, net +128. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 619–785 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 11:01766+8
7 Sept 2026, 21:41758+11
30 Aug 2026, 07:43747+26
22 Aug 2026, 17:57721+62
14 Aug 2026, 12:28659+21
6 Aug 2026, 17:32638no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:05638first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

171 reactions across 9 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6839.8%
😢2112.3%
💔127.02%
👎105.85%
😭105.85%
🤩105.85%
🍓74.09%
🕊74.09%
💘63.51%
🔥63.51%
🤯63.51%
🥰52.92%
🤬21.17%
❤‍🔥10.585%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 171 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 08:39 UTC107 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

▻ Я не знаю, есть ли смысл ждать дальше? Мне персона, непонятно откуда написала, в канале она не подписана, и в чатах я не пиарюсь на данный момент, т.к рисую для себя, и предложила трейд.Мало того, что за почти три недели мне даже не скинули скетч, то последние сообщения проигнорировали, хотя я видела, что она была в сети и меняла аватарку ( После таких ситуаций вообще нет желания делать что-то @podslyshanoartcm |

😭10🥰1

5 Aug 2026, 22:31 UTC154 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Как влд крупного канала я никогда не пойму прикола набирать аудиторию как конфешен, а затем одним днем резко менять тематику на личный канал Имхо, это неуважение к себе и к аудитории. К себе, потому что люди, которые там сидят, подписывались не на тебя. К аудитории, потому что дать ей определенное место для самовыражения и поиска единомышленников, а потом резко забрать его, еще и воспользовавшись подписками, это стра

15💘6🍓3

5 Aug 2026, 21:56 UTC166 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

▻ вы видели что творческие услуги кф переделали под личный арт канал лоооол @podslyshanoartcm | #тейк | @podslyshanoartcmbot

🤩10🍓2🕊2

5 Aug 2026, 21:55 UTC165 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

▻ дорогое арткомунити, а где можно найти набор на палитру (типа 1 палитра, n художников)? мб вы знаете худов, которые часто такое проводят, или существует специальный чатик с наборами на челленджи, типа того. и каков вообще мой шанс туда попасть, имея за душой ровно НОЛЬ законченных цветных картинок лол @podslyshanoartcm | #тейк | @podslyshanoartcmbot

5🍓1

5 Aug 2026, 15:10 UTC180 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

▻ продолжение тейка в общем звёзды в итоге мне так и не пришли, а чат был очищен😁 @podslyshanoartcm | #тейк | @podslyshanoartcmbot

😢11💔6🕊2

5 Aug 2026, 15:10 UTC180 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

▻ привет история как меня облапошили на коммишку мне пишет одна особа и мы спокойно договариваемся с ней по поводу заказа когда я скинула скетч она сказала что заплатит позже,, я уточнила через день и мне сказали что уже оплатят в конце недели... по итогу я молча прождала (что явно было не лучшим решением) ибо очень боялась надавить на человека в воскресенье я напоминаю про оплату и вижу, что она прочла но ничего м

😢10💔6🕊2

5 Aug 2026, 12:48 UTC205 views32 reactionsread 6 August 2026

▻ А почему мы молчим о том, что в сообществе художников и арт мейкеров принято то, что ты должен достигать успеха в 14-16 лет , был популярным уже везде и чтобы тебе ноги целовали. Хотя успеха художники зачастую достигают к 20-25 лет, и то еле еле. Плюсом много троллей, что ебут мозги 14-ти леткам, что они рисуют, как говном мажут по стенке. Просто мнение Неанон Некро @podslyshanoartcm | #тейк | @podslyshanoartcmb

20🔥6🥰4❤‍🔥1🍓1

3 Aug 2026, 16:11 UTC277 views29 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

▻ Мнение за которое меня бы отменили твиттерские и виабушницы: Мужская мисхарактеризация персонажей СУЩЕСТВУЕТ и не всем нравится смотреть на ебаных метросексуалов и фембоев. У художников словно аллергия рисовать песронажей с морщинами/лишним весом и не срать на его каноничную внешность/характер, ради "упрощения" и привлечение внимания гоев среди женщин. В медиа ДОХУЯ тамблер сексименов/фембоев/метросексуалов, ЗАЧЕ

28🕊1

3 Aug 2026, 07:49 UTC292 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

▻ последний наверно раз разглашу (так как я об этом рассказал почти везде где только можно) . Меня слили в хейт арт кф , причём с нихуя, а также неизвестно кто именно слил. Учитывая что я НЕ популярный художник, а людей что разглашали ненависть в моих тгк я всех перебанил . Так ещё тот кто отправил этот тейк в этот кф, сказал что якобы я рисую фетешиское порно для инцелов , ХОТЯ Я НИКОГДА НЕ ПОДРАЗУМЕВАЛ ЧТОБ НА МОИ

👎10🤯6🤬2

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @podslyshanoartcm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ПОДСЛУШАНО АРТКОММЬЮНИТИ” (@podslyshanoartcm), 766 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/podslyshanoartcm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.