Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Подслушары Бенди фд

Channel

Подслушары Бенди фд

@podslushnia

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

82subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003329945492
TypeChannel
Username@podslushnia
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/podslushnia

Growth

818281.511 Aug 2026, 06:31 — 81 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 21:23 — 82 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 06:3111 Aug 2026, 21:23
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 81–82 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 21:2382+1
11 Aug 2026, 06:3181first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
104.4%
avg views ÷ 82 subscribers
Avg views / post
85.6
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.60%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held18 (31 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total1,541
Reactions total98
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 06:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

98 reactions across 15 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🕊98100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 98reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 10:22 UTC60 views10 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Hi guys а мы поговорим о том, что некая мираж занимается мониторингом меня, коверканьем моих артов и гифтов для меня здесь, ещё и пыталась в мой сфп щп попасть, жалко скрин заявки не сделала 🤤 виной всему только то, что мы один раз стали оппами в гскм на звание бестфана у чернильного демона (этот канал там и был найден) но какого-то хуя это стало для человека резоном устраивать травлю в мой адрес, хотя мы не общались

🕊10

Signed ༒𝔦゙⃞ 𝔇𝖊𝖘𝖉𝖊𝖒𝖔𝖓ค𝅄࣪ ฺ֢♰𝅄⃟🪽

7 Aug 2026, 21:12 UTC57 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Ребят, у вашей Нонны сегодня др, мне 15 лет🤩❣️

🕊9

Signed ˖ ࣪𓏽ꉂ۰ ۪۪۫۫🌸۰˙⃟Ꮢ𝓸𝓝𝓮𝓴ₒ 𓈒 ִ۫ 𓂃

7 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC66 views11 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Люди так сильно привыкли сексуализировать Алису, что забывают что это хоррор и ни единого намёка на 18+ в игре не было, а её нередко рисуют как шлюху. Да, у неё красивый голос, да, она красивая женщина, но блин, она же не одета в откровенное и не намекает на кекс. Или весь женский пол мы будем сексуализировать?? Почему такого нет с Эллисон, Одри и Хайди? #тейк || @Bendy_Mafia_gandonbot

🕊11

Signed ‧₊🎹˚𝔇𝓪ℜ.ℒ𝔬𝓼ℑ₊🩰 ⊹

7 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC63 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Меня вымораживаает то, что ебучего Сэмми Лоуренса постоянно сравнивают с ебучими овцами, ХОТЯ ебучими овцами он называл своих ебучих жертв, где логика? А ещё было бы очень круто заиметь от вас тейки, ребят #адмтейк || @Bendy_Mafia_gandonbot

🕊6

Signed ༒𝔦゙⃞ 𝔇𝖊𝖘𝖉𝖊𝖒𝖔𝖓ค𝅄࣪ ฺ֢♰𝅄⃟🪽

4 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC74 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @HenrySteinBlogPhoto

Доброго дня! Добро пожаловать в телеграмм канал бывшего художника и со-основателя Studio Joey Drew. Я Генри Штейн, рад видеть вас тут. в телеграмм канале будут: —Записи дневника —Немного рисунков ( А также хедканоны от саппорта(⁠ ⁠◜⁠‿⁠◝⁠ ⁠)⁠♡ ) навигация

Signed ₊⊹𝒟aria ℒost {🫐 } ‧₊˚

2 Aug 2026, 20:31 UTC107 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Вот так митли делает игры? #тейк || @Bendy_Mafia_gandonbot

🕊6

Signed ₊⊹𝒟aria ℒost {🫐 } ‧₊˚

2 Aug 2026, 17:26 UTC112 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026

На повестке дня решила словить ностальгию, почитать что про меня писали за все это время в бенди триггере, и оценив совокупность, меня пробрала ржака и чувство абсурда. Там процентов 90 тейков про меня про то, что я не люблю хейт в свой адрес, и не гнушаюсь об этом высказывать. А повод для недовольства у меня есть основательный, зная что как минимум человек десять до сих пор клоунадой с травлей и мониторингом занимаю

🕊7

Signed ༒𝔦゙⃞ 𝔇𝖊𝖘𝖉𝖊𝖒𝖔𝖓ค𝅄࣪ ฺ֢♰𝅄⃟🪽

2 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC92 viewsread 11 August 2026

#вп

Signed ༒𝔦゙⃞ 𝔇𝖊𝖘𝖉𝖊𝖒𝖔𝖓ค𝅄࣪ ฺ֢♰𝅄⃟🪽

2 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC69 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @inkdemonswifePhoto

🎞🎞: сильно любишь какого-то персонажа из франшизы бенди, и считаешь себя его главным фанатом? ➿или просто хочешь получить победу ➿ на приглянувшемся чернильном ➿ чувачке? 🎂 🥹 ❤️огда тебе к нам! В 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 📷📸😠нас на канале будут 🌟🌟выходить голосования с 🌟🌟персонажами из франшизы 🌟🌟"Бенди" с самыми разными 🌟🌟званиями! 🌟 🥹 🤩 правила 🥹

🕊2

Signed ༒𝔦゙⃞ 𝔇𝖊𝖘𝖉𝖊𝖒𝖔𝖓ค𝅄࣪ ฺ֢♰𝅄⃟🪽

2 Aug 2026, 09:53 UTC124 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Здравствуйте, ребят. Хочу поинтересоваться, насколько вам интересно будет появление гскм и сшкм каналов по бенди? В данный момент я работаю над этой идеей, и мне просто любопытно, сколько людей будут в этом заинтересованы #адмтейк || @Bendy_Mafia_gandonbot

🕊5

Signed ༒𝔦゙⃞ 𝔇𝖊𝖘𝖉𝖊𝖒𝖔𝖓ค𝅄࣪ ฺ֢♰𝅄⃟🪽

1 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC99 views12 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Почему никто не хочет поговорить о том, насколько интересен дизайн Одри? Постоянно слышу только хейт про неё, но как будто никто не говорит о том, насколько её дизайн классный. В один момент он кажется немного нестандартным: в нём много деталей по сравнению с другими персонажами, но при этом он не перегружен и выглядит очень интересно! Её светящиеся глаза, рука с красивым узором, лицо, испачканное чернилами - всё это

🕊12

Signed ₊⊹𝒟aria ℒost {🫐 } ‧₊˚

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @podslushnia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 933,523 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Подслушары Бенди фд” (@podslushnia), 82 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/podslushnia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.