Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for подслушано фанронпы

Channel

подслушано фанронпы

@podslushkafanronp

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

33subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003376687059
TypeChannel
Username@podslushkafanronp
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 25 November 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded23 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/podslushkafanronp

Growth

333433.523 August 2026 — 33 subscribers23 August 2026 — 33 subscribers31 August 2026 — 34 subscribers10 September 2026 — 33 subscribers23 August 202610 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 19 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33–34 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 18:2033-1
31 Aug 2026, 18:5434+1
23 Aug 2026, 05:3033no change
23 Aug 2026, 05:1633first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

59 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💊2135.6%
1525.4%
💘58.47%
🙏58.47%
👍35.08%
🤯35.08%
🥰35.08%
🔥23.39%
👎11.69%
😁11.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 November 2025 to 24 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Jan 2026, 15:40 UTC162 views9 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Джунко(безпремиума): Почему все пытаются молчать о том, что Ичи пдф и наркоман?

🙏5🤯3💊1

22 Jan 2026, 15:20 UTC170 views1 reactionsread 23 August 2026

(А кем именно я не скажу.)

💊1

22 Jan 2026, 15:17 UTC168 views4 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Джунко(безпремиума): Из-за это вы любите своих разработчиков фанновелл?(это было организовано ими)

🥰2👎1💊1

22 Jan 2026, 15:17 UTC149 views1 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Forwarded from @fanronpacxodkiPhoto

➖➖➖➖➖> сходки с лже🔆🔆🔆🔆🔆🔆🔆🔆 ★Когда? •31 января (суббота), с 13:00 до ±16:00 ★Где? Фудкорт ЦДМа, опознать нас можно будет по самому тувкосу!! ★Это единственная НЕфандомная сходка, ждём всех!! На сходке вас будут ждать ДВА НЕнастоящих тувкоса. Можно и нужно подходить и фотографироваться!! А так же, одни из первых, кто придут на сходку получат сувенирные листовки с рекламой этой сходки!! ★Правила(тык) !!ОБЯЗА

💊1

29 Dec 2025, 17:11 UTC157 views2 reactionsread 23 August 2026

доп инфа: данный человек уже говорил, что не понимает русский, но вскрывал чужие новеллы и переводил их.

💊2

29 Dec 2025, 17:10 UTC156 views4 reactionsread 23 August 2026

🌟: будьте аккуратнее принимая работников в свой проект, так как есть 1 чел который уже успел всем уже написать по поводу вступление как: кодер, редактор, эдитор, переводчик. возможно, это скам, но кто знает. 🌟: Просто не принимайте никого, и удалите новеллу данный человек:SAGAN RESIDENCE

3💊1

27 Dec 2025, 04:45 UTC158 views1 reactionsread 23 August 2026

🌟: Если над по подробнее эт хуйня, пишите в лс(эт для знакомых)

💊1

26 Dec 2025, 19:02 UTC146 views5 reactionsread 23 August 2026

🌟: Че все такие обиженые блять, Вам изначально было похуй на шутку, узнали кто я сразу заныли, перед кем мне реально стыдно это перед шалтиром, одна особа про него наговорила в чате укола. 🌟: удалите к черту все новеллы и не позорьтесь. Новеллы это хуета поганая для детей 🌟: Ну мой.. тигр Думаю, кто-то из админов догадается кому это посвещаетсч ❤️ 🍰: так он не админ вроде

4💊1

21 Dec 2025, 14:13 UTC136 views1 reactionsread 23 August 2026

🌟: Не ожидала, что вам будет интересно мое мнение, но раз уж вы спрашиваете, поделюсь своими мыслями о бывшем разработчике. Хочу сразу сказать, что ни в чем его не обвиняю и не осуждаю, это лишь мое видение ситуации. Мне кажется, это был Ньют, разработчик June Dandelion. Он не всегда понимал, чего хочет от игры. Часто давал ненужные задания, например, обычные арты, которые так и не использовались. Также он часто что-

💊1

21 Dec 2025, 12:42 UTC133 views8 reactionsread 23 August 2026

🌟: Кто из разработчиков ВН по вашему мнению безответственный/фрик/конченный? Если хотите узнать мое мнение, то прошу 5 реакций бот для тейков: @podslushkafandanganronpa_bot

4👍2💊1😁1

20 Dec 2025, 23:39 UTC128 views1 reactionsread 23 August 2026

🫐: У каких новелл нет будущего? 🫐: У моей 🌟: У моей 🍰: будто бы у моей есть будущее 🌟: The crime feast. 🎭: У моей бот для тейков: @podslushkafandanganronpa_bot

💊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @podslushkafanronp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“подслушано фанронпы” (@podslushkafanronp), 33 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/podslushkafanronp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.