Ну и как тут не поделиться такой обратной связью? Мое мнение, что об этом продукте, который буквально меняет жизнь каждого участника на ДО и ПОСЛЕ должно узнать как можно больше людей, которые связаны с продажами. Мало кто знает, что это единственная программа с реальной гарантией результата в деньгах - ты начинаешь легче продавать и больше продавать. Чтобы узнать как устроена программа, насколько она подходит име…

Channel
Podless Sales Code
@podless
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
443subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001205861285 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @podless |
| Description | Канал о продажах и переговорах по немецкой системе “Нейрокибернетика” 🇩🇪 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 1 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/podless |
Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Oct 2026, 02:22 | 443 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 8 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 14.3%
- avg views ÷ 443 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 63.5
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 9.24%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (8 April 2026 – 27 September 2026) |
| Views total | 254 |
| Reactions total | 11 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 1 Oct 2026, 02:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 75
- Videos
- 56
- Links
- 146
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 1 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 2m 19s
- Average length
- 46s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
49 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 22 | 44.9% | |
| ❤ | 18 | 36.7% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 12.2% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 6.12% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 April 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Твой бизнес никогда не вырастет выше твоего мышления. За годы работы с предпринимателями я заметил одну странную вещь. У человека может быть сильный продукт. Команда. Деньги. Связи. Опыт. Перед ним может лежать возможность вырасти в 2, 5 или даже 10 раз. Но он её не использует. Почему? Потому что главный ограничитель бизнеса часто находится не на рынке. Он сидит в голове самого предпринимателя. И самое опасно…
🔥6❤2
Этап в продажах, на котором сыпятся большинство сделок - AFTER SALES Что и как делать, чтобы поднять количество успешных сделок записал в этом видео. Если было ценно, ставь 🔥 Детально под каждую нишу разбираем каждый четверг с участниками группы VIP программы БЫСТРЫЕ ДЕНЬГИ.
🔥3
Video, posted without a caption
Какой вариант для себя выбираете?
- Техники закрытия возражений29%
- Техники закрытия сделки29%
- Продажи в переписках14%
- Продажи по телефону0%
- Продажи в B2B64%
- Холодные продажи36%
- Демонстрация продажи “Я продам тебе твой продукт”14%
- Продажи на встрече21%
- Офлайн продажи21%
- Продажи на высокий чек36%
The shares total 264%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Приветствуем новых и постоянных участников канала 👋🏻 Впереди сентябрь один из самых прибыльных месяцев в продажах. Самое время подтянуть продажи и сделать рывок. Выберите тему практики по продажам, максимально актуальную именно для вас ⬇️
Часть 3. Самая дорогая ошибка собственника в продажах В прошлой части я писал, почему самые важные переговоры собственники часто проводят лично. Контракт на 5 000 € можно доверить менеджеру. Но когда на столе 100 000 €, 500 000 € или миллион, собственник садится за стол сам. И вот здесь начинается парадокс. Человек проводит самые дорогие переговоры в компании, но зачастую профессионально вести переговоры его ник…
🔥7
Часть 2. Почему собственники сами ведут самые дорогие переговоры? После первой встречи я задал каждому из трёх предпринимателей один и тот же вопрос. 🎯Почему сделку на 5 000 € ты спокойно доверяешь менеджеру, а переговоры на 500 000 € или 1 000 000 € хочешь вести сам? Ответ был практически одинаковым. «Потому что цена ошибки слишком высокая.» И именно здесь большинство предпринимателей начинает понимать то, чего…
❤14
3 предпринимателя. 3 разные ниши. И одна проблема, которая не даёт большинству компаний масштабироваться. Вчера у меня было три встречи, которые в обычной логике вообще не должны были оказаться в одном дне. 1️⃣ Первый предприниматель занимается SEO-продвижением сайтов в Google. 2️⃣ Второй строит рекрутинговую компанию. 3️⃣ Третий продаёт уголь и древесину. Три абсолютно разные ниши. Три успешных бизнеса. У каж…
👏2
Самый свежий! Вчера прямо на эфире в основной программе БЫСТРЫЕ ДЕНЬГИ 2.0 один из менеджеров компании поделилась результатами продаж по методу Нейрокибернетики. И вот тут моментальное подтверждение тому, что есть те кто используют годами старые инструменты, подходы, методы продаж и думают, что все знают и не верят что можно по другому: - легче - человечнее - эффективнее и есть те, кто ищет что-то новое, готов пр…
👏1
После поста про 148 разборов — получил много сообщений в личку. Большинство написали одно и то же: “Владимир, в точку. Это прям моя ситуация” Поэтому записал видео, в котором разобрал конкретно — почему клиент говорит “подумаю” и уходит. Не теория. Три реальные причины в разговоре, которые это вызывают — и как их убрать: 👉 Посмотреть здесь 10 минут. Посмотри — думаю узнаешь себя. После просмотра напиши в коммен…
🔥3
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @podless. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какой вариант для себя выбираете?
- Техники закрытия возражений29%
- Техники закрытия сделки29%
- Продажи в переписках14%
- Продажи по телефону0%
- Продажи в B2B64%
- Холодные продажи36%
- Демонстрация продажи “Я продам тебе твой продукт”14%
- Продажи на встрече21%
- Офлайн продажи21%
- Продажи на высокий чек36%
The shares total 264%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 April 2026 to 27 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@elucidation_gw · 19,619
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 1 October 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Podless Sales Code” (@podless), 443 subscribers as measured 1 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/podless.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.