Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Начальная школа Подготовка к школе

Channel

Начальная школа Подготовка к школе

@podgotovkakshkol

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

44,573subscribers

-55 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001366236571
TypeChannel
Username@podgotovkakshkol
DescriptionМы в вк 330.000 подписчиков: https://vk.com/smart_deti Реклама через биржу: https://telega.in/c/podgotovkakshkol Все материалы в канале представлены для ознакомления и могут быть удалены по просьбе правообладателя
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/podgotovkakshkol

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

44,55644,63444,5957 August 2026 — 44,628 subscribers7 August 2026 — 44,628 subscribers7 August 2026 — 44,623 subscribers9 August 2026 — 44,628 subscribers10 August 2026 — 44,634 subscribers10 August 2026 — 44,625 subscribers11 August 2026 — 44,629 subscribers12 August 2026 — 44,630 subscribers14 August 2026 — 44,626 subscribers15 August 2026 — 44,614 subscribers17 August 2026 — 44,605 subscribers18 August 2026 — 44,594 subscribers19 August 2026 — 44,592 subscribers20 August 2026 — 44,594 subscribers21 August 2026 — 44,595 subscribers23 August 2026 — 44,596 subscribers24 August 2026 — 44,577 subscribers25 August 2026 — 44,574 subscribers26 August 2026 — 44,568 subscribers27 August 2026 — 44,569 subscribers29 August 2026 — 44,571 subscribers30 August 2026 — 44,570 subscribers31 August 2026 — 44,574 subscribers1 September 2026 — 44,569 subscribers2 September 2026 — 44,567 subscribers3 September 2026 — 44,566 subscribers4 September 2026 — 44,578 subscribers7 September 2026 — 44,571 subscribers10 September 2026 — 44,573 subscribers12 September 2026 — 44,561 subscribers14 September 2026 — 44,556 subscribers16 September 2026 — 44,561 subscribers18 September 2026 — 44,573 subscribers44,5737 August 202618 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net -55. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 44,544–44,646 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 13:3744,573+12
16 Sept 2026, 03:1644,561+5
14 Sept 2026, 09:1644,556-5
12 Sept 2026, 18:1744,561-12
10 Sept 2026, 19:3844,573+2
7 Sept 2026, 18:1644,571-7
4 Sept 2026, 18:1644,578+12
3 Sept 2026, 02:1244,566-1
2 Sept 2026, 02:0344,567-2
1 Sept 2026, 04:0244,569-5
31 Aug 2026, 01:1544,574+4
30 Aug 2026, 03:2544,570-1
29 Aug 2026, 00:2644,571+2
27 Aug 2026, 22:3644,569+1
26 Aug 2026, 23:4344,568-6
25 Aug 2026, 21:5744,574-3
24 Aug 2026, 19:4244,577-19
23 Aug 2026, 05:0244,596+1
21 Aug 2026, 14:3644,595+1
20 Aug 2026, 11:2344,594first reading

Engagement

259 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 115 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.40%
avg views ÷ 44,573 subscribers
Avg views / post
624
172 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.208%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
172
of 259 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 46 of 172 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held259 (2 August 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Views total107,272
Reactions total67
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Sept 2026, 22:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈45,900
Videos
≈479
Links
≈664

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
36s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

163 reactions across 83 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤10262.6%
👍3923.9%
🔥169.82%
🐳21.23%
❤‍🔥10.613%
🆒10.613%
🍾10.613%
😁10.613%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 92 of the 259 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 163 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 259 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
5.02%
13 of 259 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
13
posts carrying an erid · 13 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
665
over 13 measured posts
Median views · rest
622
over 246 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFGVxzQH123 August 202623 August 2026
2W5zFGaBCVX111 September 202611 September 2026
2W5zFGcAQND16 September 20266 September 2026
2W5zFGfB5AR117 September 202617 September 2026
2W5zFH994pq128 August 202628 August 2026
2W5zFHC627B111 August 202611 August 2026
2W5zFHGNwvq118 September 202618 September 2026
2W5zFHW7fgM19 September 20269 September 2026
2W5zFJQvcpR112 August 202612 August 2026
2W5zFJd6ziD117 August 202617 August 2026
2W5zFJes8nM120 September 202620 September 2026
2W5zFJfsEV7110 September 202610 September 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it. 1 further token is held for this entry and not listed here.

Measured over the 259 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 25 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

25 Sept 2026, 20:16 UTC89 views2 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Photo

🌏 Πoлeзныe тaблицы пo oкpужaющeму миpу

❤2

25 Sept 2026, 03:45 UTC749 views2 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Photo

Тетрадь для письменных упражнений 1 класс ⬇️

❤2

24 Sept 2026, 12:42 UTC593 viewsread 25 September 2026
Photo

ДИКТАНТЫ ПОВЫШЕННОЙ СЛОЖНОСТИ. 1-2 КЛАСС ✍🏻

Showing the 12 most recent of 259 posts we hold for @podgotovkakshkol. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 9 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

20 Sept 2026, 09:50 UTCAnonymous Quiz73 voters

Сколько килограмм в 10000 грамм?

  1. 1 кг10%
  2. 5 кг1%
  3. 10 кг84%
  4. 100 кг5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Sept 2026, 05:49 UTCAnonymous Quiz81 voters

Сколько сумок вместимостью 50 кг необходимо для размещения в них 750 кг писем?

  1. 2516%
  2. 204%
  3. 1579%
  4. 101%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

18 Sept 2026, 16:49 UTCAnonymous Quiz56 voters

Сколько часов в году?

  1. 1040030%
  2. 978018%
  3. 876050%
  4. 56202%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Sept 2026, 15:58 UTCAnonymous Quiz28 voters

Что означает выражение "У чёрта на куличках?"

  1. Там где очень страшно4%
  2. Где то рядом0%
  3. Непонятно где, далеко96%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Sept 2026, 16:36 UTCAnonymous Quiz100 voters

🤔 Половина лимона стоит пол рубля. Сколько стоят десять лимонов?

  1. 5 рублей27%
  2. 8 рублей4%
  3. 10 рублей69%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Sept 2026, 07:28 UTCAnonymous Quiz70 voters

Решим задачу?

  1. 1091%
  2. 124%
  3. 144%
  4. 180%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 259 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 25 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

❤️‍🔥 Переходник ❤️‍🔥
@PodgotovishkaDeti · 7
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 25 August 2026
Раннее развитие ребенка 🌈
@moerazvitie · 23,217
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 September 2026
Поделки для детей 🐣
@Funny_crafts · 29,163
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 8 September 2026
Педагог
@Pedagogtyt · 66,801
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026
Шаблоны и оформление. Образование!
@shablony_top · 21,716
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 24 September 2026
Воспитатель и точка
@ucheba_pedagog_predschool · 25,060
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 14 September 2026
Дошкольник
@doshkollniku · 27,097
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 September 2026
Почерк. Чистописание. Calligraphy_ok
@calligraphy_ok · 22,907
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 September 2026
Педагоги России
@u4itelskaja · 21,437
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 September 2026
Логопедам (дефектологам) в помощь
@logopedam_v_pomosh · 30,492
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 7 September 2026
Наша начальная школа
@mschool_rf · 32,170
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 5 September 2026
УмноШкола Шамиля Ахмадуллина
@knshu23 · 67,451
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Начальная школа Подготовка к школе” (@podgotovkakshkol), 44,573 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/podgotovkakshkol.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.