Вышли 🎃🎃🎃 Закупаемся ⭐️ @BanksStarsbot
❤3🔥1

Channel
@podarkihamster
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry
954,100subscribers
-157,080 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002075137999 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @podarkihamster |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 63 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/podarkihamster |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Nov 2026, 10:55 | 954,100 | -2,978 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 08:10 | 957,078 | -1,955 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 21:56 | 959,033 | -2,327 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 12:22 | 961,360 | -1,392 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 11:34 | 962,752 | -1,687 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 12:05 | 964,439 | -1,438 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 11:29 | 965,877 | -1,913 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 07:57 | 967,790 | -1,386 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 05:40 | 969,176 | -2,178 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 02:38 | 971,354 | -2,075 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 23:14 | 973,429 | -2,114 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 20:51 | 975,543 | -1,375 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 23:45 | 976,918 | -2,132 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 20:05 | 979,050 | -1,951 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 16:18 | 981,001 | -1,248 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 14:34 | 982,249 | -1,356 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 14:10 | 983,605 | -1,808 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 10:36 | 985,413 | -2,116 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 09:07 | 987,529 | -1,680 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 04:40 | 989,209 | first reading |
33 posts held, back to 17 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 203 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 33 (17 March 2026 – 31 October 2026) |
| Views total | 10,101 |
| Reactions total | 35 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Nov 2026, 14:43 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 5 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 3 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 18 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 46.1% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 72.6% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 669 views — 0.064% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 933).
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /662916 Sept 2026, 13:00 UTC | 3525 minutes – 20 hours old | 542 views3 reactions | 60 minutes: 236 → 3.0 hours: 326 interp. → 6.0 hours: 395 → 12 hours: 476still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 1.7 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /662810 Sept 2026, 13:22 UTC | 228under a minute – 7 days old | 1,360 views ~11 reactions | 60 minutes: 268 interp. → 3.0 hours: 356 → 6.0 hours: 425 → 12 hours: 479 → 24 hours: 557 → 2 days: 684 → 7 days: 1,360still climbing at last reading | 557measured | 47 hours |
| /66272 Sept 2026, 16:35 UTC | 1326 minutes – 7 days old | 1,830 views ~14 reactions | 60 minutes: 461 interp. → 3.0 hours: 631 interp. → 6.0 hours: 725 → 12 hours: 792 → 24 hours: 999 → 2 days: 1,200 → 7 days: 1,830still climbing at last reading | 999measured | 18 hours |
| /662530 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTC | 920 minutes – 4.7 hours old | 424 viewsno reaction reading | 60 minutes: 273 interp. → 3.0 hours: 377still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 31 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /662429 Aug 2026, 07:12 UTC | 6719 minutes – 38 hours old | 1,010 views ~6 reactions | 60 minutes: 266 interp. → 3.0 hours: 378 → 6.0 hours: 449 → 12 hours: 574 → 24 hours: 669still climbing at last reading | 669measured | 8.3 hours |
| /662324 Aug 2026, 21:39 UTC | 9013 minutes – 4 days old | 1,590 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 445 interp. → 3.0 hours: 581 → 6.0 hours: 697 → 12 hours: 962 → 24 hours: 1,170 → 2 days: 1,340still climbing at last reading | 1,170measured | 8.0 hours |
| /662212 Aug 2026, 21:45 UTC | 11041 minutes – 7 days old | 2,260 views ~11 reactions | 60 minutes: 567 interp. → 3.0 hours: 741 → 6.0 hours: 860 → 12 hours: 1,170 → 24 hours: 1,380 → 2 days: 1,620 → 7 days: 2,260still climbing at last reading | 1,380measured | 11 hours |
| /66218 Aug 2026, 20:03 UTC | 6017 minutes – 3 days old | 1,360 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 392 → 3.0 hours: 509 → 6.0 hours: 573 → 12 hours: 765 → 24 hours: 983 → 2 days: 1,180still climbing at last reading | 983measured | 10 hours |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
653 reactions across 30 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 231 | 35.4% | |
| 🤣 | 207 | 31.7% | |
| 👍 | 127 | 19.4% | |
| 🔥 | 88 | 13.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 653 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 17 March 2026 to 31 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 7 posts held from the last 30 days (14.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Вышли 🎃🎃🎃 Закупаемся ⭐️ @BanksStarsbot
❤3🔥1
Только что вышел новый безлимитный 🎁 Мишка за 50 звезд! Закупаемся ⭐️ @BanksStarsbot
❤6
☄️ НОВЫЙ БЕЗЛИМИТНЫЙ ПОДАРОК УЖЕ СЕГОДНЯ? Охуенко только что включил Чайник — а Адлер Тоберг намекнул, что это будет новый безлимитный подарок за 50 звезд Закупаемся звездами заранее @BanksStarsbot
https://t.me/graminpoker_bot
⭐ РОЗЫГРЫШ НА ЗВЁЗДЫ ⭐ Призы: 1 место 200 звёзд + Vice Cream 2-10 места по 200 на брата Условия: приятный бонус для активных юзеров бота, кто сделает любую покупку звезд👍 🎛 Итоги через 24 часа
Ну что, кто-нибудь ещё клацает всякие «тап-тап» в ТГ? 🐜Мне тут в ЛС подкинули Муравьиную ферму - Ant War с просьбой поддержать игрульку. Запустилась, говорят, буквально на днях. Заглянул посмотреть, а тут, оказывается, не просто бессмысленное клацанье по экрану. Можно развивать собственный муравейник, строить фермы, добывать ресурсы, прокачивать колонию и даже нападать на муравейники других игроков. Есть PvP, кланы…
❤7👍2
🎁 РОЗЫГРЫШ НА ПОДАРКИ 🎁 Призы: 1-9 место = получат NFT 11-30 место = получат мишку ✔️ Условия: ⭐️ Быть участником этого канала Репост другу = 🙂 🎛 Итоги завтра в 22:00!
❤9🤣7
СРОЧНО!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Просто заходи на Mazik, открывай бесплатный кейс и забирай свой подарок! 💥 Открой и забери свой приз 🎉 👉 @mazikrobot_bot
❤6👍1🔥1
⭐️ РОЗЫГРЫШ НА 5000 ЗВЁЗД ⭐️ ⭐️ Будет 100 победителей Участвовать могут все, кто молодец 🥳
🔥6
Представляем игровую площадку Crashino ⚡ Один из лучших букмекеров прямо в Telegram. Регистрация в один клик, без кус и верификации. Депозит в крипте и мгновенные выводы. Бонусы на старте: 🎁100% к первому депозиту до 1000 USDT. 🎰200 фриспинов за второй депозит. 🔥25% кешбэка каждый ДЕНЬ, всем игрокам, без отыгрыша. Деньги приходят на баланс раз в сутки активировать ничего не нужно
❤3
🎮 ИГРАЕШЬ В STANDOFF2? 🎮 ТОГДА ТЕБЕ К НАМ❗️ ⁉️ Что делать: 1. Залетаешь на сайт: uptrade.gg 2. Вносишь любой депозит 3. Получаешь +20% к пополнению и забираешь жирный дроп. Не сиди с пустым инвентарем - залетай на сайт, активируй промокод и крути на максимум ! #UPTRADE #Standoff2 #Скины #Халява
🤣7❤3👍3
Какой-то китаец собрал себе такой профиль 😮 Наверное, это стоит много, поэтому пошли крутить 777 и лутать подарки 🎁 https://t.me/+jpr-YU7WCrhhODUy Стабильный 👉 VPN Дешёвые звёзды 👉 тут
❤17🔥5👍3🤣2
Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @podarkihamster. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@podarkihamster edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 5 posts on @podarkihamster as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Казино ? Нет! Подарки 😁” (@podarkihamster), 954,100 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/podarkihamster.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.