Channel
@pobeg_is_office
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
686subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001904692573 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pobeg_is_office |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 30 November 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pobeg_is_office |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:57 | 686 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:30 | 688 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:31 | 688 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 4 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (4 July 2025 – 19 July 2026) |
| Views total | 531 |
| Reactions total | 12 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 02:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
395 reactions across 14 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 | 157 | 39.7% | |
| custom 5267031043487051884 | 124 | 31.4% | |
| custom 5260238621427906856 | 35 | 8.86% | |
| custom 5388737892531058670 | 28 | 7.09% | |
| 💔 | 15 | 3.80% | |
| custom 5318784231172743951 | 10 | 2.53% | |
| 👀 | 10 | 2.53% | |
| custom 5936245376938937415 | 6 | 1.52% | |
| 🤯 | 5 | 1.27% | |
| custom 5773703744076123672 | 4 | 1.01% | |
| custom 5336919610321020155 | 1 | 0.253% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 395reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2025 to 19 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pobeg_is_office. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 July 2025 to 19 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
А вы?
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Вернуться в тело С начала года я похудел на 7кг. Нет, я не толстый чувак, которого можно с этим поздравить. Для меня такое похудение сродни трагедии, потому что мой рост 187 см и вес всегда был около 76кг. Но что поделать, в тусовку влетели стресс, никотин и отсутствие зала. Этому трио потребовалось 3 месяца, чтобы превратить меня в щепку весом 69кг. Ну ладно, ветку 😅 В теле не было ни сил, ни энергии, ни жизни. Ме…
🏆7🤯5
Ах да 😁 Рум-турщик из меня тот еще, поэтому держите фотки того, что можно снимать в Москве за 60к 🎩
🏆12custom 52670310434870518849👀1
Стоимость переезда Где нашел? Квартиру я нашел сам на циан. Без риелтора и упования на знакомых, которые «о как раз сдают квартиру». Также пробовал Авито, но это откровенная помойка с кучей фейк-объявлений и непонятных агентств по типу «Аренда под ключ». Авито, ловите дизлайк 👎 Сколько стоит месяц? 60.000р + коммуналка. Квартира в пределах МКАД + 2 минуты до метро. Можно найти дешевле, но будут отваливаться такие п…
👀9custom 52670310434870518845🏆2
Переезд 5 июня я подписал доки и арендовал свою четвертую съемную квартиру 🍪 В планах было сделать все быстро и четко, грубо говоря управиться за пару дней. Но я немного не учел, что в этот раз переезжаю один. Отец мне помог перевезти вещи со склада, а дальше - уборка, окна, разгрузка вещей, обстановка квартиры, первая покупка продуктов и бытовухи… Короче, я знатно прикурил , даже заболеть умудрился 🥱 В итоге пер…
🏆20custom 52670310434870518847custom 57737037440761236724
Откупился Спустя 7 месяцев с момента получения 161 блокировки я все же ее снял. Ну как снял, просто решил откупиться и усвоить дорогой урок за 200.000 рублей 🥔 Я трижды писал в ЦБ со всеми пруфами и доказательствами мошеннической схемы; съездил завел дело в МВД; кучу раз обращался в банки-инициаторы блокировки и все без толку. Никому нет дела до того, что реально произошло, всем похер. Они видят, что на меня подан…
🏆14custom 526703104348705188411
Все сначала Признаться честно, когда я писал пост за главный опыт 2025 года, я думал, что это то самое дно, от которого смогу оттолкнуться и двигаться дальше. Но в жизни, как и в торгах на бирже, если думаешь, что «поймал» дно, значит рынок обязательно подкинет еще одно. Первый квартал 26 года подвел черту моим отношениям с девушкой, с которой мы были вместе ~5 лет. Квартира, быт, и тепло, которое дарили друг другу…
🏆25💔15custom 526703104348705188411
Главный опыт 2025 года Сколько себя помню, я всегда хотел работать на себя. Каждая работа в найме была лишь средством для достижения этой цели. Я брался за любую работу, чтобы как можно быстрее открыть свое дело, вывести его на доход и стать свободным. Не быть привязанным к графику, начальнику, месту жительства и прочим недостаткам найма. И я получил эту свободу. Сегодня примерно два года, как я работаю на себя, и …
🏆27custom 526703104348705188415custom 526023862142790685611
В суматохе с этой проблемой я стал прокручивать в голове варианты: а что можно было сделать по-другому? Гарант был проверенный, сделка добровольной, но все же я попался на скам и словил кучу проблем ⚰️ Окей, тогда надо было проводить в крипте и проблемы получилось бы избежать. Сегодня я узнал про еще один гениальный метод скама на крипте, когда подделывают начало и конец твоего кошелька, а скрытая часть при перевод…
custom 52670310434870518849🏆5custom 52602386214279068565
Черный треугольник Недавно у меня была сделка по продаже Telegram-каналов. Обсудили стоимость, подключили гаранта и при выборе метода оплаты (крипта/рубли) я выбрал… рубли. Эта ошибка стоила мне 200.000р и 161-ФЗ на всех счетах и банках. Оказалось, что при оплате за каналы, покупатель загнал мне ту же крипту, но через P2P сервис. И мне пришел не один перевод, а целых пять, так еще и два из них с грязными деньгами …
custom 526703104348705188416custom 52602386214279068568🏆2
Затишье в этом блоге было сложно преодолеть, потому что написать хотелось каждый день, но я только и успевал уворачиваться от жизненных «подарков», судьбы или кармы (хз, кто там во что верит) За последние полгода в моем арсенале опыта кратные пополнения: я знаю отличия психолога от психотерапевта и психиатра; лежал в больнице, чтобы получить возврат денег по S7; попал в черный треугольник на крипте; имею блокировку …
🏆14custom 52670310434870518847custom 52602386214279068563
Привет, я тут кое-что создал @EasySantaBot А как у вас дела?
🏆9custom 52670310434870518846custom 52602386214279068562custom 59362453769389374152
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @pobeg_is_office. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А вы?
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2025 to 19 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,456,407 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Побег из офиса” (@pobeg_is_office), 686 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pobeg_is_office.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.