Channel
@pnl_crypto_lab
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
377subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003042626224 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pnl_crypto_lab |
| Description | turning meme coins chaos into rational system the best chat: https://t.me/+ILyVzoBqLzE2Nzlh DM: @rashid_main 🧲 https://linktr.ee/memeconomy |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pnl_crypto_lab |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 377 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:39 | 377 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 25 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
60 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 29 | 48.3% | |
| 🔥 | 16 | 26.7% | |
| 👍 | 12 | 20.0% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 1.67% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 1.67% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 60reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 25 January 2026 to 22 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
GM GM guys, how its going? I forgot to congratulate you with 4/20 day, my bad, congrats! Speaking of, i uploaded episode 2 of my 1 to 420 SOL challenge (check it out). I showed the system that helped me comeback from 0.5 SOL and broke down my trades. I think you can take something from it and try it yourself in your next trading session. Next video will be about my mistakes and what I should’ve done differently -…
🔥4👍2❤1
GM GM guys, how its going? I decided to make a real 1 sol to 420 sol challenge, record everything in progress and upload it all to my yt channel (first episode is already out). Since i am against all kind of rugs and scams i am showing true results and the results in my first video will surprise you (or maybe not). Keep in mind that i was trying to make this content more engaging so i was trading only low cap toke…
❤4🔥3
GM guys Yesterday i uploaded a new video where i compared all the popular trading terminals. While writing the script I realised that this new trading terminal called Trojan is actually surprisingly good. It comes with all GMGN’s features but with much more generous referral terms and lower commissions. So its no surprise that it took it’s market share so quickly. Today i was testing its copytrading feature with …
❤2
Is it normal for top tier platforms like Nansen to include scams in their Smart Money selections? I decided to analyze the addresses provided by popular analytics platforms, and the results are shocking. About 95% of the wallets featured there are untradeable garbage. Yet, so many people trust these dashboards blindly. The screenshot shows an example of what these services try to feed you. Even to the naked eye, i…
❤3👍2
GM guys I’ve been trading memecoins and running this channel for the past 6 months, testing different approaches and sharing everything openly. I even ran two public trading challenges - both times my traders lost and eventually left the market (those challenges are over). That made me look deeper into what’s actually going on. I understood that if you want to be profitable here, you need two things: • understan…
👍3❤2
gm guys, if you’ve ever tried trading, you know how hard it is to understand the current meta and narrative if you haven’t been in the trenches for a while usually you need to watch new pairs for a couple of hours just to finally understand what’s going on and what’s actually worth buying i know this from my own experience, so i created a meta-scan service (currently in alpha testing). its purpose is to identify th…
❤9👍3
ZachXBT just dropped a massive investigation exposing a wild insider trading scheme. But this time, the problem isn't another greedy token founder. Employees at Axiom literally weaponized internal user data to trade against the market. Here is what they actually did: ⚪️Tracked specific accounts via UID, referral codes, or connected wallets. ⚪️Accessed the full picture: linked addresses, complete transaction histor…
❤3👀1💯1
GM guys, a quick look into how meme coin world works. Today there was a depeg of USD1 token (depeg means that the stablecoin’s price is more or less that a dollar and not tied to it as it supposed to be). Almost immediately some devs launched USD0 token. They were in a hurry so the launch was dirty and they werent even trying to hide bundled buys. And the market didnt even care about it lol. Traders blindly moved…
👍2
GM guys, i want to share with you some useful services and videos for meme coin trading: 1. if you need a ground to get started -> i have this video for beginners. 2. updated filters and top wallets to follow are here 3. if you dont want to risk real money -> check tradingsimbot’s service for paper trading 4. if you want to become more systematic trader and control risks -> this short video 5. how to find wallets wo…
🔥9❤2🏆1
pumpfun & terminal just introduced a new feature if you didn’t know, in september they introduced fees for token creators. from that moment, if you launch a token on pumpfun, you as a dev get a cut from pumpfun’s commissions on that token (they take 1% on every trade) and starting today, creators now have an option: get all of these commissions for themselves by default, or give these commissions back to traders of…
❤3
GM guys the market dumped hard, but that doesn’t mean crypto is dead i’ve been in crypto for a long time, the last time i made a 7x on sopt was when i bought solana at $30, then it went down to $12, and later pumped to $200. this kind of stuff always happened in crypto. that’s probably why we all love this market. about memecoins - yeah, fear hits them too. but memecoins are fast dopamine (casino basically) and …
GM guys, yesterday there was a crazy runner that almost touched a $3M market cap 4T7XUugzhMtqxY8F7fmYaBGQyd6D7KdNJR7MvzVVpump We spotted it almost at launch while trenching in VC in our Discord I’m feeling FOMO now because I decided not to ape in this time Better luck next time. p.s. call by @KhalidbinSalmanAlSaud
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @pnl_crypto_lab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 980,887 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Memeconomy Lab” (@pnl_crypto_lab), 377 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pnl_crypto_lab.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.