Channel
@plyushikzzz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
115subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001627853905 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @plyushikzzz |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/plyushikzzz |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 12:53 | 115 | -2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 06:43 | 117 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:51 | 118 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 118 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
316 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🍓 | 90 | 28.5% | |
| 💘 | 89 | 28.2% | |
| ❤ | 81 | 25.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 28 | 8.86% | |
| 🕊 | 20 | 6.33% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 1.58% | |
| 👾 | 3 | 0.949% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 316 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
❀•°•═════ஓ๑♡๑ஓ═════•°•❀ Что ж, артфайт подошёл к концу! Первый мой в жизни артфайт. И честно, я очень довольна этим ивентом, он раскрыл некоторые мои потенциалы в рисовании. Я попробовала рисовать фоны, попробовала разные техники рисования (хоть и не так много), но все из них мне понравились; в общем, было кайфово! ────୨ৎ──── Спасибо всем за атаки и ответки, было приятно их получить от крутых, знакомых и рандомных ху…
💘8❤🔥6🔥3
Ну тупа тропики Мьесть для @plyushikzzz
❤9❤🔥3💘3
Последняя атака и мести рандомам! «────── « ⋅ʚ♡ɞ⋅ » ──────» Думаю, что с меня достаточно, аф выдался замечательным, но всю ману я истратила; если будут атаковать, то мстить обязательно буду
❤🔥12💘5🔥2
месть для плюшика 😈 а еще это была моя первая попытка в клип студио, хихи #арт #гифт
❤🔥7
ㅤㅤ ㅤㅤ 𝑇𝑤𝑜 𝐷𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑠 ╞═════𖠁܀•⊹✧⊹•܀𖠁═════╡
🍓23❤4💘2
ㅤ━━━━━━༺༻━━━━━━ Полускетчевая простая атака
❤16🕊6💘3🍓1
ㅤㅤДевятая атака! ━━━━━━ ◦ ❖ ◦ ━━━━━━
💘16
Быстрая ответка рандому ──────⊹⊱✫⊰⊹──────
❤19💘2
Френдли фаер на Ирину!💥 ꒷︶꒷꒥꒷‧₊˚꒷︶꒷꒥꒷‧₊˚ Фон отдельно кину в щп, но могу и здесь, если интересно? Всем новеньким привет!
🍓16💘7👾3❤2
Кстати, ребятки, добрый вечер всем! 『••✎••』 Тут крутые ребятки создали удобную папку где вы можете найти художника из любой тимы Аф и атаковать его (𓂂꜆◕⩊◕꜀𓂂) Также у них еще открыт набор, можете тоже вступить! Скоро начну рисовать атаки
🕊9
➳༻❀✿❀༺➳ Седьмая атака! На чай☕ ────୨ৎ────
🍓16💘7❤5
Атака на меня - и сразу ответка ⋆. 𐙚 ˚ Результат мне не сильно зашёл Дальше постараюсь получше * ੈ✩‧₊˚*
🍓17❤3🕊3💘2
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @plyushikzzz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@plyushikzzz named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“who is this?” (@plyushikzzz), 115 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/plyushikzzz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.