Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Метелкин

@pluralistpapers

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,178subscribers

+10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001752046436
TypeChannel
Username@pluralistpapers
Created28 August 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pluralistpapers

Growth

1,1681,1781,1736 August 2026 — 1,168 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,168 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,173 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,178 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,167–1,180 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 23:231,178+5
9 Aug 2026, 23:371,173+5
6 Aug 2026, 19:011,168no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:491,168first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 23 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
39.4%
avg views ÷ 1,178 subscribers
Avg views / post
465
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.09%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held17 (23 June 20265 August 2026)
Views total6,040
Reactions total368
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 19:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

465 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁10121.7%
8618.5%
8418.1%
🔥7516.1%
👍4810.3%
💯306.45%
😱163.44%
🤯102.15%
🤬91.94%
👌40.86%
😍20.43%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 465reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pluralistpapers. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 June 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 06:48 UTC257 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Неожиданно для себя нашел в этом тексте место для того, чтобы поработать по профилю — как историк интернационализма. Для перспективы сравнил в паре абзацев внутреннее устройство и принятие решений в спортивной организации ФИФА с МВФ и ООН: «У ФИФА есть серьезное отличие от привычных международных институтов. Для примера: ООН и МВФ живут на взносы государств — деньги идут снизу вверх, и потому вопрос „кто сколько вне

👍8🔥8

4 Aug 2026, 07:48 UTC332 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://t.me/thesisEleven/959 Знаменитые теории среднего уровня, такие как: ну, вы знаете, Путин ведет себя как пацан, поэтому в любой непонятной ситуации он сначала спрашивает «чо думаешь я не перелезу?», а потом перелезает. Жора Крыжовников предупреждал нас уже давно! https://youtube.com/shorts/F9BgC8Sy2gM?is=i586PeMVAq4IOqje А серьезно, если вам не интересна теория, а интересен разбор путинской «кукухи», то ст

🔥8

4 Aug 2026, 05:59 UTC324 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Очень толковая иллюстрация того, как выглядят производственные цепочки на примере дронов и почему разные группы российских бюрократов мешают друг другу. https://t.me/ejdailyru/411858

👍8

2 Aug 2026, 11:23 UTC609 views41 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Невозможно разделиться на друзей и врагов, если вы не проговорили основания для таких различий. (Буду повторять это рефреном): если у вас нет сообщества, скрепленного общими идеями, нет анализа, исследований, агитации, пропаганды и медиа, то вы просто не понимаете, кто вы, и почему оказались по одну сторону баррикад. И это очень конфликтогенная ситуация, гораздо более опасная, чем мифическая угроза «идеологических ср

22👍8🔥4💯3🤬2😁2

2 Aug 2026, 11:23 UTC430 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://t.me/DespairAndCivism/1071 РАДИКАЛЬНАЯ ДЕМОКРКАТИЯ. ЛЕВЫЕ ПРОТИВ (СО)ОБЩЕСТВА? Прошу прощения у товарищей, что нарушаю установленный порядок проведения дискуссии («в Сигме или на почту»). Напишу по старинке в соцсетях, раз есть запрос на фидбек. Фундаментальная проблема «радикальной демократии» — в радикальной демократии. Общая теоретическая рамка — это суррогат идей философов Эрнесто Лакло и Шанталь Муфф,

🔥2352

2 Aug 2026, 11:23 UTC542 views28 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Меня, как и других антикапиталистических левых, корежит и смешит такая постановка проблемы. Вот здесь в хорошем политфилософском подкасте специально обученные люди с юмором разбирают эти идеи и называют их «соевым Шмиттом», указывая на то, что совершенно непонятно, чего Шанталь Муфф в итоге предлагает? Мы живем в либеральной демократии, где политика толерантна и к капиталистам, и (все чаще) к фашистам. Можете выходит

15🔥63😁3👍1

2 Aug 2026, 07:27 UTC417 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

«Коммерсантъ» в деталях описывает, что произошло с женщиной курьером, которая принесла бомбу в ресторан в высотке на Кудринской. Предположительно, там проходил день рождения главкома ВКС России Александра Чайко. Мясные штурмы, мясные ходячие бомбы — так и живем.

😱16🤬4🤯2

1 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC457 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ну что. Кажется, настало время поговорить про радикальную демократию (то есть про слабую и одновременно вредную теорию)

🔥127

1 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC428 views25 reactionsread 6 August 2026

На этой неделе неожиданно для себя мы узнали, что у коммерциализации футбола есть пределы. Президент мировой футбольной федерации Джанни Инфантино, кажется, взял на себя слишком много. Он захотел создать отдельную компанию, которая взяла бы под контроль коммерческие права на главные турниры планеты (включая мужской и женский чемпионаты мира), и продать в ней крупный пакет (20–21%) частным инвесторам. Якорным инвесто

18👍7

30 Jul 2026, 20:28 UTC513 views59 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

После третьей, четвертой, пятой мировой ядерной войны—короче, любого масштаба апокалипсиса—можно быть уверенным, какие-то вещи в нашей жизни останутся неизменными. Бог послал нам российских либералов, чтобы они своей неадекватностью «заземляли» нас всех в любые времена. Смотришь и думаешь: а, ну эти дураки на месте, значит, живем-живем еще.

😁4212🤯5

29 Jul 2026, 10:19 UTC556 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Как отвечать хейтерам в соцсетях. Инструкция от экономиста Бранко Милановича

😁12👌2😍2

29 Jul 2026, 09:41 UTC601 views36 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

2212👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @pluralistpapers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 997,190 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Метелкин” (@pluralistpapers), 1,178 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pluralistpapers.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.