Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for titov's burden

Channel

titov's burden

@TheWMB

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,064subscribers

-52 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001438653914
TypeChannel
Username@TheWMB
DescriptionСергей Титов, главред «Осторожно, новости»
Created2 June 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/TheWMB

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “The White Man's Burden” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

8,0418,1258,0836 August 2026 — 8,116 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,116 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,115 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,110 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,125 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,120 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,112 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,111 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,110 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,109 subscribers31 August 2026 — 8,105 subscribers3 September 2026 — 8,099 subscribers8 September 2026 — 8,094 subscribers12 September 2026 — 8,082 subscribers16 September 2026 — 8,073 subscribers1 October 2026 — 8,061 subscribers8 October 2026 — 8,053 subscribers13 October 2026 — 8,041 subscribers17 October 2026 — 8,074 subscribers19 October 2026 — 8,107 subscribers22 October 2026 — 8,093 subscribers26 October 2026 — 8,090 subscribers29 October 2026 — 8,088 subscribers1 November 2026 — 8,085 subscribers7 November 2026 — 8,083 subscribers11 November 2026 — 8,064 subscribers8,0646 August 202611 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 97 days, net -52. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,028–8,138 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 11:418,064-19
7 Nov 2026, 08:168,083-2
1 Nov 2026, 02:598,085-3
29 Oct 2026, 07:058,088-2
26 Oct 2026, 01:518,090-3
22 Oct 2026, 21:578,093-14
19 Oct 2026, 16:478,107+33
17 Oct 2026, 01:588,074+33
13 Oct 2026, 21:178,041-12
8 Oct 2026, 17:358,053-8
1 Oct 2026, 21:388,061-12
16 Sept 2026, 16:178,073-9
12 Sept 2026, 13:008,082-12
8 Sept 2026, 09:418,094-5
3 Sept 2026, 08:548,099-6
31 Aug 2026, 07:468,105-4
28 Aug 2026, 04:138,109-1
25 Aug 2026, 06:458,110-1
22 Aug 2026, 12:038,111-1
19 Aug 2026, 05:428,112first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 24 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
58.7%
avg views ÷ 8,064 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,740
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.53%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held21 (24 June 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total37,900
Reactions total1,337
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 13:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
710
Videos
261
Links
377

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
7m 14s
Average length
1m 12s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,935 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥1,50038.1%
😁71918.3%
😢63916.2%
👍3528.95%
🤬2947.47%
💊1774.50%
🤯1032.62%
✍771.96%
😈551.40%
👎190.483%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,128 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 8 posts held from the last 30 days (12.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

9 Nov 2026, 10:17 UTC≈1,460 views155 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @ostorozhno_novostiVideo

«Это война не России с Украиной, а Кремля с Украиной». Дмитрий Муратов* обратился к журналистам и читателям во время прощания с редакцией «Новой газеты». Лауреат Нобелевской премии мира и сооснователь «Новой газеты» Дмитрий Муратов выступил возле офиса издания в Потаповском переулке в Москве, которое сегодня покинула редакция. Он призвал международное сообщество не отождествлять россиян с российской властью, не забы…

❤‍🔥87😢43👍17💊3😁3🤬1😈1

30 Oct 2026, 08:37 UTC≈3,610 views192 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Всё, что происходит многие годы, — уже давно «постыдная страница в истории российских медиа» (ну и страны), но даже по меркам нынешних тёмных двадцатых это конкретное обновление пиздеца с большой болью воспринимается. Издание, из-за которого многие хорошие журналисты вообще выбрали эту профессию, которое, по сути, является нашим национальным достоянием и причиной для гордости, всё-таки додавили. Ничего удивительного…

😢135❤‍🔥27🤬13💊7👍5😁5

25 Oct 2026, 21:11 UTC≈5,980 views274 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Ребят, не зря я целый последний месяц прожил в Белграде. Работаем! А если серьезно, то поздравляем братский народ Сербии с тем, что они добились самого главного — сменяемости власти. Не так важно, кто там и что обещает, куда важнее — люди смогли поменять власть, если у них есть к ней претензии, а значит, идти вперёд как общество. Не терпеть по 20 лет, думая: «Когда уже это закончится». Сменяемость — вообще безумно в…

❤‍🔥181👍55💊21👎7🤬4😢4🤯1😈1

21 Oct 2026, 23:57 UTC≈5,450 views174 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Здорово, когда в стране с бело-сине-красным флагом, преимущественно православной и славянской, со сложным социалистическим прошлым, сотни тысяч людей выходят на улицы, чтобы бороться за демократию, свободу слова, против коррупции и несменяемости власти. Даже несмотря на давление властей, задержания и попытки подавить протесты. Это я про Сербию, конечно, вы не подумайте лишнего. В Белграде встречали колонны студентов…

❤‍🔥121👍37💊9😢5✍1👎1

21 Oct 2026, 21:31 UTC≈4,000 views103 reactionsread 11 November 2026

1) возможность политического самовыражения, выйти на улицу и сказать, что тебя заебла власть и засидевшийся у руля конкретный человек — это очень очень круто 2) сербы великие абсолютно

❤‍🔥73👍22😢6✍2

21 Oct 2026, 21:30 UTC≈4,380 views54 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥39👍10✍3💊1😈1

16 Oct 2026, 17:24 UTC≈6,290 views125 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Эти кейсы очень тяжело двигать из-за того, насколько в России нормализовано подобное. Даже сами студенты писали потом в чатах: ну он же не один у нас такой (пиздец), почему именно про этого? Наглядно показывает масштаб проблемы. Хотя это сильно распространено и за пределами вузов, в медиасреде. Конкретно здесь помогла стена во «ВКонтакте» — человек в открытую публиковал фотографии студенток со странных ракурсов, а по…

❤‍🔥45👍32🤬27👎6🤯5✍4💊4😢2

15 Oct 2026, 16:01 UTC≈6,730 views260 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

В последние недели стали всё чаще выходить новости о новых потрясающих зданиях, которые скоро возведут в нашей любимой Москве. Многие из них выдержаны в популярной нынче у властей стилистике «стеклянное хуй пойми что». Тут я каждый раз вынужден вспоминать, как летом меня товарищи вытащили, чтобы развеяться от депрессии, в специфическое столичное заведение «Бланк» (ака место для 40-летних менеджеров, бросивших жену, в…

❤‍🔥112😢93👍44✍4💊4👎1😁1😈1

24 Aug 2026, 18:37 UTC≈4,630 views85 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

важные монологи в эфире соловьева

💊59😁22😈4

24 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC≈2,640 views88 reactionsread 28 August 2026

У «оставшихся» из медиасреды и смежных областей периодически возникают разговоры и шуточки про «внедренных», «завербованных». Есть позиция, что ты никогда не узнаешь, кто именно этот человек, потому что им может оказаться кто угодно (только если не тот забитый зумер, которого пару лет назад заставили писать КАЖДОМУ журналисту с предложением дружить.) Я и сам знаю несколько человек, которых убеждали «посотрудничать»(т…

😢63✍12❤‍🔥5👍3💊3👎1🤯1

13 Aug 2026, 08:22 UTC≈5,000 views250 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

День (или два) назад у дома поставили стенд для информирования о предстоящих выборах. За ночь на нём появилась вот такая надпись.

❤‍🔥194👍31💊10✍8😁7

10 Aug 2026, 17:46 UTC≈5,710 views327 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Николай Рыбаков после заседания ВС обратился к молодым ребятам на улице со словами, что «все только начинается», — с мыслью, мол, все у вас впереди, доживем до лучших времен. Сразу с грустью вспоминаешь себя, свои 20 лет — времена, когда в Москве еще были возможны протесты, открытые дискуссии, даже Навальный на выборах мэра. Тогда нам всем казалось, что вот еще чуть-чуть, еще немного — и мы доживем до нормальной сист…

❤‍🔥226😢49👍43😁7👎1💊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @TheWMB. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Гусь Василий под тополем
@gus_vasili · 38,126
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 31 August 2026
Лиза Лазерсон
@znachit_net · 29,823
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 7 September 2026
Киты плывут на вписку с ЛСД
@whalesgohigh · 61,504
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
Прогревочная
@progrevg1 · 22,609
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 20 September 2026
Василий Тополев
@vasil_topolev · 44,513
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
Григорий Баженов
@furydrops · 28,184
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 9 September 2026
Михаил Светов (Комитет по Этике)
@mrlibertarian · 29,849
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 7 September 2026
КАШИН
@kashinguru · 75,059
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 August 2026
CONWAY
@conway671games · 47,472
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 28 August 2026
Алексей Наумов. Внешпол
@vneshpol · 21,194
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 September 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“titov's burden” (@TheWMB), 8,064 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheWMB.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.