Channel
@plohayaQ
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,000subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001132543696 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @plohayaQ |
| Created | 10 March 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/plohayaQ |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:45 | 7,000 | +3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:11 | 6,997 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:21 | 6,999 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:02 | 6,999 | first reading |
28 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 28 (20 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 79,130 |
| Reactions total | 1,168 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 02:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,020 reactions across 25 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,020 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,168reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @plohayaQ. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 28 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Ну что, мурал завершили и давайте признаем, выбор сочетания цветов - не лучший. Стоило бы подойти более ответственно. Хотя гораздо важнее два других вопроса, насколько этот рисунок "давит" и кто будет его поддерживать, когда через пару лет он начнет осыпаться? Фото "Нетипичный Курск" (подчеркну для мелких воришек, в число которых записался и местный Пепел)
❤24
Когда мне говорят, что достойных депутатов нет и все они одинаковы, я прошу назвать хотя бы 10 из них, за чьей деятельностью человек наблюдает. Чаще всего не могут, в лучшем случае назовут 2-3 фамилии. Я же наблюдаю за многими и могу уверенно сказать, что назависимо от партии полезные депутаты есть. Или, как Николай Афанасьевич Карцев, были, и в новом сезоне трусами и подонками не допущены до выборов за то, что реаль…
❤62
Некий стример из Курска устроил в прямом эфире на Твиче пранк с инсценировкой задержания силовиками: в ходе стрима некие лица в форме сотрудников СОБР Росгвардии на автозаке с номерами МВД, оборудованном спецсигналами, остановили автомобиль со стримерами и провели «задержание» с использованием предметов, похожих на оружие. Позже выяснилось, что весь этот пранк, дискредитирующий правоохранительные органы, был розыгрыш…
❤12
Всё так и есть, перед объездной в черте города строят аммиачный завод и все молчат. И даже если взять самый страшный вариант, что туда попадет рой украинских дронов или ракета, лоббисты этого проекта лишь грустно покачают головой, находясь далеко от Курска, а владельцы (которые еще дальше) потеряют часть денег, и то не факт благодаря страховке. А вот сколько курян умрет и заболеет - вопрос, это будут тысячи или деся…
❤59
На прошлой неделе Курск посетил футуролог Сергей Переслегин, его образы будущего и аналитика настоящего всегда интересны. Он подробно рассказал о своей поездке в Курск и Белгород. Очень рекомендую прочесть, несмотря на то, что букв много, взгляд со стороны может быть полезен: https://t.me/sociosoft/4871
❤9
Что-то давно мы не вспоминали Боевку. А ведь там по-прежнему идет работа, ну как "идёт", тихо и неспеша, без оглядки на сроки и качество. В очередной раз, теперь до 20 сентября продлили работы Бегового центра на входе в Боевку, дорожки для инвалидов на пляже напротив Новой Боевки то ли доделали, то ли нет, но техника до сих пор стоит. Расчистку от валежника, поросли и кустарников ведут своеобразно - вначале выпиливая…
❤29
⬆️⬆️⬆️ Это хорошо, а что дальше? Насколько партия готова к полноценной депутатской работе, в том числе и со спорами с властью, если до этого светлого дня ни разу не сказала ни слова против? Да, такая экспертиза нужна, и хорошо, что ее провели. Но простая констатация того, что мы в жопе, не помогает находить выход. 💁🏻♀️
❤31
Пришли результаты пробы воды, которую взяли волонтёры фонда «Экосфера» из реки Кур Они оказались плохими: показатель ХПК (химического потребления кислорода) превышен в несколько раз — до 70 мгО/дм³! Много это или мало? Для сравнения с нормативами (согласно правилам охраны водных объектов): Для чистой питьевой воды норма обычно составляет до 3–5 мгО/дм³. Для водоёмов рыбохозяйственного значения норма — до 15–30 мгО/…
❤15
#нампишут "Когда нам говорят о том, что где-то, как-то, в каких-то органах власти, дескать засели сторонники укронацистов - знайте - это так и есть. Засели. Только идейных и осознающих, что именно они делают, а так же - зачем - мало. Точно мало. Разве что "совсем-совсем" наверху, где руки ФСБ их могут достать с множеством оговорок. Куда больше тех, кто своей неуёмной жадностью, а так же глупостью и пренебрежением …
❤50
Нормальная реакция здорового человека. 👇👇👇 https://t.me/fedorovldpr/7077
❤15
Хочется жить в мире, где добро - всегда легко отличить от зла. Но часто свет прячется в тени, а зло натягивает "белое пальто". Возьмём Владимира Синельникова. Казалось бы, известный всем моральный урод, лжец, которого неоднократно заставляли отвечать за слова. И ведь всё равно продолжает, при этом уверяя в своей честности и порядочности. В этом году платежеспособность ему позволила войти в первую тройку "Справедливо…
❤61
Переломили через колено и против воли жителей сделали. Зачем и для чего? Непонятно. Самый центр города станет местом притяжения мертвой энергии. Какого будет людям, которые идут с рынка с покупками каждый раз видеть убитого ребенка? А тем, кто идёт хоть немного отвлечься в кинотеатр "Юность"? А тем, кто приходит в ЦП, или следующую Европу за покупками или отдыхом? Бесконечно жаль малыша, ставшего заложником чиновни…
❤115
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @plohayaQ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 236,463 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Плоxая куряночка” (@plohayaQ), 7,000 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/plohayaQ.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.