Channel
@plntledger
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry
41subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003020116390 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @plntledger |
| Created | 21 September 2025 โ measured โ dated from the channelโs first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/plntledger |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:23 | 41 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 42 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 42 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 21 September 2025 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
VOID VOID VOID nf interest email the supplier investigated why this account lost its premium, and it turns out that a buyer cancelled the plan. naturally, this caused the account to lose its premium. it also appears that some buyers do not follow and understand the rules. additionally, it was found that a buyer not only cancelled the plan but also removed two profiles from the netflix account and even used the accouโฆ
to report na itong nf interest email, nawalan ng premium. pakisend na ng reports niyo now para ma-note agad. ps. naglinis kami ng device management dahil more than 40 devices ang logged in at gumagamit, lalo sa P2 at P5. kaya 'wag kayo magu gulat kung ma-void ulit tayo ni supplier kasi napakarami ng devices na gamit. shared acc = damay lahat. https://t.me/aurumee/1046
will be deleting your reports sa comment section nito. hindi po riyan maglalapag ng reports. may tutorial na nga po kung paano gagawin ๐ซฉ
how to send reports โ include proof of vouch and issue, will ignore kapag wala ! โ make reading a habit
โ โแช. report form ใญ tg username: ใญ premium availed: ใญ solo or shared: ใญ email/number: ใญ password: ใญ profile (if applicable): ใญ pin (if applicable): ใญ date purchased: ใญ date reported: ใญ remaining days: ใญ issue/problem of account: attach proof of vouch & issue in one bubble chat only !
. โ reports update .
Channel created
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @plntledger. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank โ 317,498 of 1,629,452 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐ผ๐ฝ๐๐น๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐น๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ด๐ฒ๐ฟโ (@plntledger), 41 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/plntledger.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.