MS-SQL servers, with their weak and publicly exposed passwords, are a primary attack vector against Windows systems. They identify and scan poorly managed MS-SQL servers, then perform brute force or dictionary attacks to log in with administrator privileges. Malware is then installed and controlled. After logging in to the MS-SQL server using an administrator account, malware is installed using the xp_cmdshell comma…
Channel
Hacker penetration/DDOS attack
@plkj512
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
51subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002443106206 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @plkj512 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/plkj512 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:01 | 51 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:53 | 51 | first reading |
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 25 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 148
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
VBS viruses are written in VB Script. They exploit the openness of the Windows system and, by calling existing Windows objects and components, allow the program to directly control files, the system, and the registry, making them extremely powerful. VBS script viruses are commonly spread through email attachments, IRC chat channels, and LAN shares. They can also spread by infecting web pages such as htm, jsp, php, an…
Exp During testing, the yso package must be added as a dependency to trigger the CC chain. Therefore, in practice, it's best to run both simultaneously, as long as the target version is correct.
— 让搜索更高效 · 让信息更有价值 — 🔍帮你找到有趣的群组、频道、视频、音乐、电影、新闻 📢: @CJYQNEWS | 🤖: @CJYQ 👇点击下方按钮,进行搜索👇
— 让搜索更高效 · 让信息更有价值 — 🔍帮你找到有趣的群组、频道、视频、音乐、电影、新闻 📢: @CJYQNEWS | 🤖: @CJYQ 👇点击下方按钮,进行搜索👇
Similarly, I subsequently used the FTP protocol to scan intranet ports. Unfortunately, Java SSRF generally doesn't support dicts or gophers, and the forum and customer service aren't on the same intranet, making it difficult to attack intranet sites like Redis. Unfortunately, this customer service system has an administrator backend, but it's subject to a whitelist of IP addresses, resulting in 403 errors. While I c…
This vulnerability exists in the editor's modeline feature, which is enabled by default on some Linux distributions but not on macOS. When Vim opens a file containing a comment line containing a Vim modeline, it automatically reads the parameter configuration in that line and adjusts its own settings to that configuration. Vim modeline is disabled by default. Penetrate backend permissions, databases, and servers. Cu…
Suspicious strings in registry values This technique is a great way to scan for malware that attempts to evade antivirus detection by writing to disk. These programs often write their malicious code to registry keys (such as REG_BINARY and REG_SZ). This is commonly known as a fileless attack. Setting a daily scheduled task to scan the user's HKCU registry key and output the results to the system event log (using Even…
— 让搜索更高效 · 让信息更有价值 — 🔍帮你找到有趣的群组、频道、视频、音乐、电影、新闻 📢: @CJYQNEWS | 🤖: @CJYQ 👇点击下方按钮,进行搜索👇
— 让搜索更高效 · 让信息更有价值 — 🔍帮你找到有趣的群组、频道、视频、音乐、电影、新闻 📢: @CJYQNEWS | 🤖: @CJYQ 👇点击下方按钮,进行搜索👇
A botnet is generally composed of hackers, control protocols, springboard hosts, and zombie hosts. The controller of the botnet communicates with the clients on the zombie hosts through a specific control protocol, thereby remotely controlling the zombie hosts on the botnet.
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @plkj512. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,165,400 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hacker penetration/DDOS attack” (@plkj512), 51 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/plkj512.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.