Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for جمهوری افلاطونی

Channel

جمهوری افلاطونی

@platonicrepublic

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

121subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001094158335
TypeChannel
Username@platonicrepublic
CreatedBetween 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/platonicrepublic

Growth

1171211196 August 2026 — 118 subscribers9 August 2026 — 118 subscribers13 August 2026 — 117 subscribers19 August 2026 — 118 subscribers25 August 2026 — 121 subscribers6 August 202625 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 20 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 116–122 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 15:04121+3
19 Aug 2026, 04:58118+1
13 Aug 2026, 02:04117-1
9 Aug 2026, 04:32118no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:21118first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.1%
avg views ÷ 121 subscribers
Avg views / post
34.0
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (15 June 20268 August 2026)
Views total136
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 04:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 01:41 UTC39 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

‌ ‌به گمانم همه در نقطه‌ای از زندگی‌شان این تجربۀ تکان‌دهنده را داشته‌اند که به آینه نگاه می‌کنند و یکباره بازتاب چهره‌ای غریبه را در آن می‌بینند. از خود می‌پرسیم: «این فرد کیست؟» البته می‌دانیم که این چهرۀ خودمان است. اما میان این چهره‌ای که در آینه می‌بینیم و احساس خودمان از این‌که به‌واقع چه کسی هستیم، فاصله‌ای است. احساس می‌کنیم آن کسی که در آینه نگاه می‌کند، کسی که ذهنش سرشار از خیالات، نقشه‌ها، احساسات، و خاطرا

1

1 Aug 2026, 22:00 UTC42 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

У жизни нет окончательного смысла, но человек может наполнить её смыслом через любовь @platonicrepublic

1 Aug 2026, 18:09 UTC41 viewsread 9 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9H5jDcN2cGQ @platonicrepublic

27 Jul 2026, 23:15 UTC57 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
File

هر شب و روزی که بی‌تو می‌رود از عُمْر بر نَفَسی می‌رود هزار نِدامَت عمر نبود آن‌چه غافل از تو نشستم باقیِ عمر ایستاده‌ام به غِرامَت عالیجناب سعدی @platonicrepublic

1

11 Jul 2026, 12:46 UTC99 viewsread 9 August 2026

رُخِلیو یا نفهمیده بود مُرده یا به همین راحتی‌ها زیر بارش نمی‌رفت. روی همین حساب، مرتب از قبرش می‌زد بیرون و تعجبی نداشت اگر توی یکی از این رستوران‌های دم قبرستان، مشغول غذا خوردن ببینی‌ش. هر از گاهی هم سری به رتورنو ۲۰۱ می‌زد و ساعت‌ها می‌نشست با ما حرف قدیم را می‌زد. چند نفرمان سعی کردیم قانعش کنیم که دیگر فقط یک جسد است و راستش بوی تعفنِ بدی هم می‌داد. اما گوشش بدهکار نبود و با پررویی تمام، هر جا و هر وقت دلش می‌خ

8 Jul 2026, 12:18 UTC102 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

«دوزخ، دیگران‌اند؛ و در عین حال، بدون دیگران ما حتی معنای وجود خود را هم نمی‌یابیم.» ژان پل سارتر @platonicrepublic

1

7 Jul 2026, 09:15 UTC104 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Find what you love and let it kill you @platonicrepublic

5 Jul 2026, 23:11 UTC94 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

حذف تاریخ‌‌نویسان فوتبال یکی برزیل و دیگری دُن آنچلوتی! @platonicrepublic

5 Jul 2026, 22:10 UTC83 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

‌ ‌تو عصبانی هستی، اِلِنا. خشمگینی. خیلی غمگینی. می‌دانی که داری گوشت‌تلخ می‌شوی؟ تلخ مثل آن توت‌های کوچکی که گاز می‌زدی، یادت هست؟ آن روز توی جنگل. تو ترسیدی، رنجیدی. حتماً تصمیمم به نظرت خیلی بی‌رحمانه یا احمقانه آمد. بدگمان شدی. خسته شدی. هیچ‌وقت تو را این همه خسته ندیده بودم. و بی‌شک، صبوری، خیلی صبوری، النا. کینه‌توز‌ی‌ات، خشونتت، و ناراحتی‌ات صبوری‌ات را می‌کوبد توی صورتم. صبرت بی‌رحم است، مهاجم است. منتظر چیزی

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @platonicrepublic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“جمهوری افلاطونی” (@platonicrepublic), 121 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/platonicrepublic.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.