Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Планерка Рязань

Channel

Планерка Рязань

@planerka_ryaz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

370subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001944370713
TypeChannel
Username@planerka_ryaz
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/planerka_ryaz

Growth

364371367.57 August 2026 — 364 subscribers8 August 2026 — 365 subscribers8 August 2026 — 365 subscribers14 August 2026 — 367 subscribers22 August 2026 — 371 subscribers29 August 2026 — 370 subscribers3707 August 202629 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 22 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 363–372 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 14:15370-1
22 Aug 2026, 21:08371+4
14 Aug 2026, 21:04367+2
8 Aug 2026, 06:31365no change
8 Aug 2026, 00:57365+1
7 Aug 2026, 10:11364first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 January 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

477 reactions across 20 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁24250.7%
🤣8818.4%
👎234.82%
💩163.35%
👍142.94%
122.52%
🤡112.31%
🔥91.89%
🙊91.89%
👏61.26%
🕊51.05%
🤯51.05%
🎅40.839%
😭40.839%
🥰40.839%
💯30.629%
😱30.629%
🙈30.629%
🤝30.629%
🤩30.629%
7 further kinds102.10%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 477reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 January 2025 to 11 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Feb 2025, 16:56 UTC≈2,170 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026

«Анонс «Панорамы города» - «Как туристам законсервировать воспоминания о солнечных днях в Рязани?» Вопрос, которым мучается любой турист», - админ «Планерки» на прогулке по радио во дворике рязанского СИЗО.

😁14🔥54👍3👎1

30 Jan 2025, 09:58 UTC≈2,440 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Одни менеджеры и мерчендайзеры кругом, а на завод идти некому

😁18💊2👎1🙊1

30 Jan 2025, 06:43 UTC≈2,310 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Предъяву кинули, кароч

😁8🔥2🤣21👎1

29 Jan 2025, 17:45 UTC≈1,780 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Жирному небу - Да! Да! Да! Ядерному взрыву - Нет! Нет! Нет!

😁13🤯5🕊4🤝3👎1

27 Jan 2025, 18:42 UTC≈1,600 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Иван Ушаков, директор газеты "Рязанские ведомости", которую читают больше десяти человек, как правило, только когда мы её вот тут репостим, пришёл к выводу об утрате влияния западными СМИ

🤣19😁5🙊3🎃2🤡2👎1

26 Jan 2025, 16:06 UTC936 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Давайте-ка пока без новостей про чего-то там в рязанском небе

😁20👍4💯3👎2

24 Jan 2025, 18:56 UTC≈3,380 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ревизорро

😁11👏2🐳1👎1🕊1🤣1🥴1

22 Jan 2025, 14:46 UTC≈1,080 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

К любому пи#децу

🤣17😁4🙊4👍1👎1

21 Jan 2025, 19:00 UTC≈1,000 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Новости 21-го века подъехали

😁15🎅4🤩3👎2🤗1

21 Jan 2025, 15:54 UTC896 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

А есть ещё какой-то старый?

😁16💩51👎1🤷‍♂1

21 Jan 2025, 10:15 UTC857 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Лучше "Рязанских ведомостей" про такое никто не расскажет: "Не случайно же Наталья Золотых так соразмерно с собой назвала журнал, который создала и редактировала – «Золотой дождь». Он был ярким, интересным, очень женским и сильно похожим на редактора. А как же иначе? Мы, помнится, читали его не без интереса. Я понимаю теперь, после многолетнего доминирования на рынке глянцевых журналов, что в «Золотом дожде» не было

😁13🥰3🤡21👎1

21 Jan 2025, 10:11 UTC712 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

А не замахнуться ли нам на краеведческую рубрику, понимаете ли? В 98-м году в Рязани недолго выходил журнал "Золотой дождь".

😁16👏3👍2👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @planerka_ryaz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Усы Куракиной
@FSBRyazan · 48,317
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Планерка Рязань” (@planerka_ryaz), 370 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/planerka_ryaz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.