Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for АУДПР

Channel

АУДПР

@pkdua

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

94subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001201326819
TypeChannel
Username@pkdua
Created2 February 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/pkdua

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9496957 August 2026 — 95 subscribers9 August 2026 — 95 subscribers24 August 2026 — 96 subscribers8 September 2026 — 94 subscribers7 August 20268 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 32 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 94–96 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 19:3794-2
24 Aug 2026, 19:0796+1
9 Aug 2026, 12:4595no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:5795first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 57s
Average length
39s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

49 reactions across 14 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53187833592943824992449.0%
custom 53190195824956746411326.5%
custom 54021828839242565981224.5%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 20:43 UTC20 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @gomeloblavtoVideo

Video, posted without a caption

custom 53187833592943824992

Signed Marksista

7 Aug 2026, 12:52 UTC20 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @TexticulessPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 53187833592943824992custom 53190195824956746412

Signed iSNST 🇸🇰

27 Jul 2026, 07:27 UTC61 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @exticulesPhoto

Сатана

custom 54021828839242565982

Signed iSNST 🇸🇰

26 Jul 2026, 13:41 UTC≈4,120 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 53190195824956746413custom 54021828839242565982

Signed Pavel Krasilnikov

26 Jul 2026, 13:23 UTC48 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @jqofaPhoto

это высокотехнологичные биокапсулы с эктоплазмой, позволяющие исцелить все болезни и увеличить продолжительность жизни до 300 лет. не пересылай их никому и сам даже не смотри на них, потому что они мои, не отдам сука.

custom 53187833592943824992custom 54021828839242565982

Signed iSNST 🇸🇰

23 Jul 2026, 10:54 UTC59 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 53190195824956746415

Signed Marksista

23 Jul 2026, 10:52 UTC56 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Илко

custom 53187833592943824994

Signed iSNST 🇸🇰

23 Jul 2026, 10:52 UTC58 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Как скажешь, Ильедар

custom 54021828839242565982

Signed Pavel Krasilnikov

23 Jul 2026, 10:52 UTC60 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Сорри нот сорри, но эти мемы "гыгыгы посмотрите какие тупые пендосские имена" это несусветная глупость. Типа конечно ебучие довоенные имена в их полной форме (которая не используется примнрно нигде) будут звучать круче чем короткие формы звучащие в разговорнойречи

custom 54021828839242565982

Signed iSNST 🇸🇰

22 Jul 2026, 07:41 UTC47 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @neuralmeduza

Все страны ЕС признали Путина президентом Словакии без одобрения ООН. Власти России подтвердили: "Путинская Россия с 1999 года заняла доминирующее положение в Евросоюзе".

Signed Pavel Krasilnikov

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @pkdua. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Jul 2026, 08:05 UTCAnonymous Poll13 voters

Разделяют ли иудеи-веганы "мясные" продукты от "молочных" продуктов?

  1. Нет, тк веганские и мясные и молочные продукты на самом деле растительные и не надо их делить92%
  2. Да, тк растительная молочка/мясо всё равно счмтается молочкой/мясом8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“АУДПР” (@pkdua), 94 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pkdua.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.