Pixl Coin: Coin of the week pinned a photo

Channel
Pixl Coin: Coin of the week
@pixl_coin_of_the_week
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
112subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001135889806 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pixl_coin_of_the_week |
| Created | Between 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pixl_coin_of_the_week |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 20:16 | 112 | -2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 04:18 | 114 | -2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:12 | 116 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 117 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:29 | 117 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 18 December 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 February 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 45m 42s
- Average length
- 45m 42s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
PixlCoin presents our Coin Of The Week.... 🎆 Earthbyt 🎆 AMA >> 8PM UTC Mon 14th Feb @ https://t.me/PIXLCOTW 📝 Contract 0x0D1AfEcE252fF513C5D AMA >> 8PM UTC Mon 13th Feb @ https://t.me/PIXLCOTW 📝 Contract 0x0D1AfEcE252fF513C5D210AEAE88f6C7D37e6ab2 📃 Project Description A climate friendly deflationary token on the Bina…
https://t.me/PIXLCOTW
https://t.me/PIXLCOTW PIXLCOIN presents our Coin Of The Week... ✅Bridges ✅ AMA - 3rd Feb 2022 9pm UTC --->> @ https://t.me/PIXLCOTW --->> Contract Adress <<--- 0x0e2114955023b736fa97d9e2fcde2836d10b7a5c --->> Product Description <<--- Bridges aims to deliver DeFi, and its opportunities to everyone in a safe, innovative and equitable environment. Stable BUSD or BEP20 BTC or ETH r…
Pixl Coin: Coin of the week pinned «Due to some changes needing to be made, we have moved the Coin Of The Week to a new group here. Please join, and leave this one All for all and none for one https://t.me/PIXLCOTW»
Due to some changes needing to be made, we have moved the Coin Of The Week to a new group here. Please join, and leave this one All for all and none for one https://t.me/PIXLCOTW
Income Island have now made their first step to v1.5 and properties now are bought with II tokens not bnb
Anyone staked on BUSDX and ready for their first Launchpad project in 5 minutes?
PXLC/Cure AMA 8/1/22
Video, posted without a caption
Live stream finished (56 minutes)
Live stream started
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pixl_coin_of_the_week. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@pixl_coin_of_the_week named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Pixl Coin: Coin of the week” (@pixl_coin_of_the_week), 112 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pixl_coin_of_the_week.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.