Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for письмо светом 🤍

Channel

письмо светом 🤍

@pishi_svetom

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

217subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002351348237
TypeChannel
Username@pishi_svetom
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/pishi_svetom

Growth

2172232207 August 2026 — 222 subscribers8 August 2026 — 222 subscribers15 August 2026 — 223 subscribers22 August 2026 — 221 subscribers29 August 2026 — 219 subscribers4 September 2026 — 218 subscribers12 September 2026 — 217 subscribers7 August 202612 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 35 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 216–224 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 02:21217-1
4 Sept 2026, 18:16218-1
29 Aug 2026, 02:53219-2
22 Aug 2026, 15:22221-2
15 Aug 2026, 18:53223+1
8 Aug 2026, 10:32222no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:46222first reading

Engagement

4 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

95 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52787713709504133693536.8%
custom 52604352493256990352728.4%
custom 52784166624863487292223.2%
custom 53753197446834638091111.6%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 95 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 17:47 UTC46 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🩵

custom 52604352493256990355custom 52784166624863487295custom 52787713709504133693custom 53753197446834638093

5 Aug 2026, 17:46 UTC46 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

такие солнечные денечки ☀️

custom 52784166624863487297custom 52604352493256990355custom 52787713709504133695

1 Aug 2026, 08:51 UTC150 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

яркому июлю - яркая раскладка 💫🔠🌺❤️🦔 словно бескрайное поле, налитое жизнью в самом расцвете своего роста 🤩💛 делитесь в комментариях своими июльскими деньками 🌻

custom 527877137095041336915custom 527841666248634872910custom 52604352493256990356

31 Jul 2026, 15:46 UTC130 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

новое развлеченье на прогулку - съездить в поселок и посмотреть как центральная улица застраивается декорациями для съемок исторического фильма

custom 527877137095041336912custom 526043524932569903511custom 53753197446834638098

Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @pishi_svetom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“письмо светом 🤍” (@pishi_svetom), 217 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pishi_svetom.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.