Channel
@pishemvsud
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
14,457subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001348518626 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pishemvsud |
| Created | 5 March 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pishemvsud |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:28 | 14,457 | -3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:02 | 14,460 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 14,462 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:21 | 14,463 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:53 | 14,464 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:26 | 14,467 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:11 | 14,469 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:22 | 14,467 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:15 | 14,467 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 9 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
617 reactions across 12 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 558 | 90.4% | |
| 👎 | 59 | 9.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 617reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2025 to 6 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pishemvsud. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 July 2025 to 6 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Заголовки в судебных актах нужны Часть судей начали нумеровать некоторые абзацы в своих решениях и постановлениях, обозначают так смысловые блоки, а вот заголовки практически не используют. Жаль, с заголовками намного удобнее и понятнее. Для примера я взял текст постановления Конституционного суда РФ. Сравните, как выглядит текст постановления оригинальный и тот же текст, но уже с заголовками. Текст с заголовками …
👍52
«Я хотел помочь людям. Это же так просто! Неужели вы не понимаете?» В этом канале я написал почти все, что хотел и сейчас канал — это база знаний по теме дизайна процессуальных документов для российских судов. Я прекрасно понимаю, что теперь оформлением документов будет заниматься та или иная модель ИИ, которой вы или ваш клиент вместо вас даст задание подготовить документ в суд. Год назад благодаря runetlex.acade…
👍51👎14
А какими ИИ вы пользуетесь по работе? Можно несколько указать, если не одним пользуетесь.
The shares total 126%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
👍29👎5
Раздайте роли Привет, давно не виделись. Как вы? ИИ осваиваете? За какие платите или бесплатными пользуетесь? Серьёзная проблема при работе с ИИ — это персональные данные, их трансграничная передача и всякие там тайны, NDA. Нельзя просто так взять и загрузить документ в ИИ. Приходится заморачиваться с анонимизацией. Я пришёл вам рассказать как облегчить себе анонимизацию процессуальных документах — раздайте роли. …
👍66
Вводная часть Как в процессуальном документе, оформленном по ГОСТ, указывать реквизиты дела и сведения об участниках процесса. Очень просто. Сразу после заголовка к тексту (названия процессуального документа) идёт таблица в один столбец. ГОСТ не запрещает вставлять в текст таблицы. В таблице указываем: ⁃ Номер дела и о чём оно; ⁃ Стороны При желании в таблице можно указать любые дополнительные сведения. Судью, …
👎36👍16
File, posted without a caption
👍46
Всем привет! С 18.08.2025 действует новый ГОСТ 7.07.97-2025 с требованиями к оформлению документов, Касательно оформления писем, к которым относятся процессуальные документы, ничего особенно не поменялось. Но я всё равно обновил версию ГОСТ, адаптированную для подготовки процессуальных документов. Пользуйтесь! Как в процессуальный документ, оформленный по ГОСТ, прикрутить сведения об участниках процесса напишу в сл…
👍66
А вам какая иллюстрация нравится?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Photo, posted without a caption
👍5
Работа над ошибками Прошлая моя иллюстрация некоторым подписчикам не зашла. Показалась слишком сложной для восприятия. Говорят таблица какая-то нужна. Я считаю, что если мы хотим показать разницу в цифрах, то иллюстрация будет лучше, чем просто таблица с цифрами. А в иллюстрации столбцы будут лучше, чем круги, порезанные на кусочки. Столбцы лучше показывают рост или снижение и соотношение между собой. Всё же я под…
👍21
Сила наглядности Судьям нравятся понятные процессуальные документы. Еще лучше, когда вы не только хорошо описали ситуацию словами, но еще и представили её наглядно. Если в тексте есть иллюстрации, любой читатель изучает их в первую очередь. Судьи не исключение. Держите это в голове когда хотите вставить иллюстрацию в текст. Она должна быть понятна сама по себе. Три шага к эффективной иллюстрации: 1. Сформулируйте…
👍42
Пятничный сеанс саморазоблачения! За исходник спасибо каналу Кафедра мемного права
👍67
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @pishemvsud. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А какими ИИ вы пользуетесь по работе? Можно несколько указать, если не одним пользуетесь.
The shares total 126%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
А вам какая иллюстрация нравится?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2025 to 6 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 851,807 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пишем в суд” (@pishemvsud), 14,457 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pishemvsud.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.