Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Алинчик | пирсинг • скайсы • тату • Омск

@pirs_ok_da

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

793subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001906460512
TypeChannel
Username@pirs_ok_da
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pirs_ok_da

Growth

793796794.58 Aug 2026, 06:06 — 796 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 06:15 — 796 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 05:13 — 793 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 06:069 Aug 2026, 05:13
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 793–796 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 05:13793-3
8 Aug 2026, 06:15796no change
8 Aug 2026, 06:06796first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.1%
avg views ÷ 793 subscribers
Avg views / post
294
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.86%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held16 (23 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total4,706
Reactions total370
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 06:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
26s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

370 reactions across 16 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
14840.0%
🍓6216.8%
❤‍🔥5915.9%
🔥5615.1%
👻143.78%
💋123.24%
💔71.89%
🥰61.62%
🤩30.811%
🤔20.541%
🤬10.27%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 370reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pirs_ok_da. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 04:45 UTC88 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

такой опыт конечно впервые, но мне очень даже понравилось! предлагаю вам просто насладиться красотой и красоткой🤭

🔥129🍓5🤬1

7 Aug 2026, 18:34 UTC167 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ой ребятки видимо плохо ждёте, судя по реакциям

👻13🍓8💋5

7 Aug 2026, 11:50 UTC205 views76 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

ждёте? или за тату на лице тоже отписки пойдут?

37❤‍🔥18🍓17👻1💋1💔1🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 16:53 UTC211 views39 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @alisontattsPhoto

Play piercing

15🔥10❤‍🔥8💋2💔2🍓1🤩1

6 Aug 2026, 16:51 UTC207 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @alisontattsVideo

💙 Некоторые украшения 💙💙💙 создаются, чтобы их 💙💙💙 носили. 💙💙 💙💙 Это было создано, чтобы его запомнили. Металл. Тело. Несколько минут существования. Play piercing от Алины и украшение, созданное мной специально для этой композиции. ❕Она существовала лишь несколько минут — только ради идеи, процесса и этих кадров. После съемки украшение и временные проколы были сняты. Как

14❤‍🔥9🔥6🍓2

6 Aug 2026, 15:12 UTC230 views74 reactionsread 8 August 2026

у меня есть для вас супер эксклюзив🤫 дам спойлер, в омске такого не делал НИКТО вот прям вообще никто с вас очень много реакций, потому что это просто ахуенно

34🔥16❤‍🔥15🥰5🍓3🤔1

3 Aug 2026, 16:49 UTC302 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Возьму ещё две модельки! Для записи 👉@pirs_ok

❤‍🔥32🔥2🍓1

2 Aug 2026, 17:27 UTC380 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

❗️ОКНА АВГУСТ ❗️ *если не нашли подходящее окошко пишите поищем более удобное 6.08 - 14:00, 17:00,18:00 9.08 - 14:00, 15:00, 16:00, 17:00, 18:00 11.08 - 14:00, 15:00, 16:00, 17:00, 18:00 14.08 - 14:00, 15:00, 16:00, 17:00, 18:00 16.08 - 14:00, 15:00, 16:00, 17:00, 18:00 18.08 - 14:00, 15:00, 16:00, 17:00, 18:00 20.08 - 14:00, 15:00, 16:00, 17:00, 18:00 24.08 - 14:00, 15:00, 16:00, 17:00, 18:00 26.08 - 14:00, 15:00,

🍓32🥰1

2 Aug 2026, 09:50 UTC293 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🩷😉😂🤔🍧😊😉🍧✨🩷 🩷Бесплатный маникюр от ksnailssss 🩷Скидка 50% на маникюр от ksnailssss 🩷Скидка 30% на маникюр от ksnailssss 🩷Тг премиум на 1 месяц 🩷Тг премиум на 1 месяц Условия: 🩷Быть подписаным на the real rizzov и ksnailssss 🩷Поставить реакцию на этот пост 🩷Сделать репост в телеграм канал / другу / историю 🩷Нажать на кнопку «Участвовать» За репост в канал от 100 подписчиков, будем рандомно дарить подарки за звёзды

❤‍🔥4🍓43

1 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC284 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ребята важная новость, случились не очень приятные обстоятельства и временно я нахожусь без телефона и связи, подробнее рассказала в своём личном тгк тут дублировать уже не буду, всем отвечаю по возможности отвечаю когда нахожусь дома, пожалуйста не удаляйте сообщения я их обязательно прочту, спасибо ещё раз тем, кто не равнодушен, спрашивает и переживает, я вас люблю реально 🥺 Так же если у нас стоит запись не важн

5💔4🔥3🍓1

29 Jul 2026, 12:12 UTC370 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

вы знали что так я тоже могу? вот и я нет. теперь знаете вторая моделька, когда выставляла эскизы именно хотела чтобы на ноге он был, нашел свою обладательницу, получилось мега круто

12🍓7💋4

29 Jul 2026, 06:48 UTC363 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

вчера делала весь день красоту, потихоньку буду показывать! форвард хеликс, я кстати делала его впервые 🤭 но мне очень понравился результат, поэтому буду ждать на этот прокольчик у себя

9🍓2🤩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @pirs_ok_da. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 318,798 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Алинчик | пирсинг • скайсы • тату • Омск” (@pirs_ok_da), 793 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pirs_ok_da.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.