Channel
@pipecjele
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
138subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001836136359 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pipecjele |
| Description | моя личка: @jellyw00n |
| Created | 3 February 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pipecjele |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:01 | 138 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:57 | 138 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 20 November 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
530 reactions across 14 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 136 | 25.7% | |
| 🎉 | 100 | 18.9% | |
| ❤ | 83 | 15.7% | |
| 🎄 | 76 | 14.3% | |
| 🍓 | 63 | 11.9% | |
| 🍾 | 46 | 8.68% | |
| 🎅 | 14 | 2.64% | |
| 🕊 | 8 | 1.51% | |
| 💅 | 2 | 0.377% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.377% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 530reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 20 November 2023 to 30 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
кина не будет я рисую теперь очень редко и для себя, потому что жизнь такая но если кому-то все еще интересно мое творчество, я буду выкладывать его тут канал будет как склад моих рисунков, но посты будут очоч не часто и без особой смысловой нагрузки https://t.me/jele_sklad
🍓16🔥9🕊5❤1
с возвращением? на самом деле, я выгорела от рисования. оно мне просто не приносило удовольствие. сейчас я твердо решила закончить экспериментальную работу, чтобы посмотреть, верны ли были мои догадки. и да, они подтвердились. мне было некомфортно рисовать из-за того, что я пытаюсь усложнять стиль. добавляю сложные тени, покрас и тд, и тп. я попробую снова втянуться в арт-коммьюнити, стиль изменится, ибо я не буду т…
🍓23🔥10❤7
💘💛💛💛💛💛💛 💘💛💛💛💛💛💛💛 ➿➿➿➿ 🔖Ваша задача - нарисовать Цуняшу в летне-весеннем наряде в придуманной ситуации, из ограничений лишь ваша фантазия. ➿➿➿➿ 📁 ДЛЯ УЧАСТИЯ✉️ ✉️подписка и репост к себе на канал ✉️прислать скрин репоста в комменты и написать «участвую» ➿➿➿➿ 📁 ПРИЗЫ✉️ 💕три разных направления по два места в каждом: арт, комикс и анимация ➿➿➿➿ 1️⃣ место - 1000р/акриловый стенд цуняши + место в шопе + пиар пост 2️⃣ место…
🔥2❤1
кстати у меня 2 марта был день рождения, о котором я в итоге никому не говорила в арт ком, поэтому… лучший подарок на (прошедший) день рождения художника - репост его работ!!! МНЕ 20 ОБАЛДЕТЬ 😧 @pipecjele <3
🔥30❤11🍓4
жестко растеряла все подписки за это время, но любимые ждуняшки остались, поэтому… я закончила коммишку !!! и снова убегаю в закат на учёбу <3
🔥26❤10🎉7🍓4
вот такой простой авокадный кисик для разогрева нарисовался аукцион будет в тендернесс, ДР, фуридаши шопах
❤36🍓10🔥3
ура опять тесс, в этот раз костюм на 14 февраля сессия ЗАКРЫТА, скоро будет актив, выходит 🔥
🎉49🍾6❤5🎅4💅2🕊2🍓1🔥1
хихи кастом на письма желаний от шопов как проводите праздники? я вот смоталась с семьей в другой город 🕺
🎄37🎉5🍾2
не могла оставить Вас без новогоднего поздравления ❤️ большое спасибо каждому, кто следит за моим каналом!! именно благодаря Вам я стараюсь рисовать не в стол, а выкладывать хоть что-то год был тяжелым (с каждым годом нагрузка становится все больше, оно и понятно), но очень продуктивным я вернулась к рисованию, наконец начала хоть немножко вести соцсети (хаха только тг), сильно повысила скилл и перестала бояться п…
🎉20🎄4🎅3🍾1
что хотите?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🎉6🎄1
мне кстати разрешили выложить рисунок для новогоднего коллаба, поэтому… очередной пост с тесс ахахахаха
🎄31🎉3🎅2🍾1
вчера сдала самый важный зачет семестра, в честь этого держите картинку 🌸
🍾33🎉9🎅4🎄3
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @pipecjele. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
что хотите?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 20 November 2023 to 30 December 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 626,984 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@pipecjele named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“желейный автопром” (@pipecjele), 138 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pipecjele.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.