Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ленивчик.art

@pinksloth_art

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

438subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001857811318
TypeChannel
Username@pinksloth_art
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pinksloth_art

Growth

438439438.58 Aug 2026, 10:19 — 439 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 10:20 — 439 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 15:02 — 438 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 10:198 Aug 2026, 15:02
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 438–439 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 15:02438-1
8 Aug 2026, 10:20439no change
8 Aug 2026, 10:19439first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.6%
avg views ÷ 438 subscribers
Avg views / post
81.6
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
17.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (28 June 20268 August 2026)
Views total408
Reactions total65
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

262 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52471594238093684319937.8%
custom 53752596623859498156324.0%
custom 53753608217506708293011.5%
custom 52696226568182355532710.3%
custom 5269521566172988722249.16%
custom 5332635092680466349197.25%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 262reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 05:06 UTC31 viewsread 8 August 2026

Недельку мы приходили в себя, теперь же пришла пора наконец поработать! Анонс стрима пока сделать не могу, надеюсь управиться с пнг моделькой за пару дней и там начнётся веселье 😏 Вообще скучала по вам. Как у вас дела?

8 Aug 2026, 05:01 UTC31 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Хееей Давно не виделись, да?) Как думаете, что это значит? 👀🥺

custom 53326350926804663495custom 53752596623859498154custom 52471594238093684313

20 Jul 2026, 13:53 UTC106 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я щас посреди поля в меньше часа езды от Ташанты🥺 Удивительно, что тут есть интернет

custom 524715942380936843110

20 Jul 2026, 13:52 UTC103 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня др самой сладкой и любимой булочки Я хотела арт с ним сегодня выложить, но забыла с концами скинуть себе файл🗿 обойдёмся старым Короче с днём рождения, Тарталья, желаю тебе новый скин и частых критов😊

custom 526952156617298872211custom 524715942380936843110custom 52696226568182355533

16 Jul 2026, 18:34 UTC137 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Дорогие мои любимые! Спешу сообщить, что я на две недели улепётываю в отпуск! Буду жоска отдыхать, а потом ещё немного отдыхать после отдыха 💫Приготовила на полку ОЧЕНЬ КРУПНУЮ поставку с кучей новинок, так что задача томичей - всё скупить! Вернусь - проверю. Последние два дня были капец какие насыщенные на работу, сижу уже сейчас поздней ночью и поверить не могу, что всё собрала, аж голова с руками гудят. Поела я за

custom 524715942380936843116custom 53752596623859498153

9 Jul 2026, 16:13 UTC156 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Красотка Лаума закончена! Спасибо большое всем, кто был сегодня со мной❤️ Полную версию можно будет увидеть на Boosty! 🥰

custom 537525966238594981514custom 53753608217506708296custom 52471594238093684312

9 Jul 2026, 13:48 UTC161 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Тыкай на текст, чтобы перейти на трансляцию! Всем хорошего вечера 🥰

custom 53753608217506708295custom 52696226568182355533

9 Jul 2026, 13:35 UTC136 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Включение через 10 минут! Продолжаем рисовать Лауму! ❤️😊

custom 52471594238093684313

8 Jul 2026, 17:27 UTC146 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ну какая красота у нас получается🥹 Завтра продолжаем!! Всем доброй ночи и сладких снов 🥰

custom 524715942380936843124

8 Jul 2026, 15:26 UTC122 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Рисуем-рисуем! Тык Скорее подключайся! Тык

custom 52471594238093684315custom 52695215661729887222

8 Jul 2026, 15:11 UTC111 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Сейчас сижу рисую красивую Лауму и думаю - может стримчанский подрубить?

custom 53753608217506708293

6 Jul 2026, 04:08 UTC150 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🌟Собираю контент на будущий стрим Рисовашки! Так что можете покидать персонажей, которых будем чиркать. В полноценку пока упарываться нет смысла, просто ограничимся красивыми скетчами😇

custom 53753608217506708298

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pinksloth_art. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Jul 2026, 16:38 UTCAnonymous Poll32 voters

Персонажи какого региона Геншина вам нравятся больше всего?

  1. Мондштадт28%
  2. Ли Юэ13%
  3. Инадзума19%
  4. Сумеру13%
  5. Натлан6%
  6. Нод Край22%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 493,201 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ленивчик.art” (@pinksloth_art), 438 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pinksloth_art.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.