Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Розовый фламинго

@pink_flamingo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

37subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002174691583
TypeChannel
Username@pink_flamingo
DescriptionОбзоры на книги и порой даже фанфики
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/pink_flamingo

Growth

377 August 2026 — 37 subscribers10 August 2026 — 37 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36–38 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 21:4637no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:1637first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 30 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
75.0%
avg views ÷ 37 subscribers
Avg views / post
27.8
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held19 (30 March 20264 August 2026)
Views total111
Reactions total14
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 21:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
423
Links
54

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

76 reactions across 18 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2634.2%
🔥2026.3%
❤‍🔥1215.8%
👍56.58%
33.95%
😁22.63%
😍22.63%
🤣22.63%
11.32%
💔11.32%
😢11.32%
🤩11.32%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 March 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 16:56 UTC19 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Книжные итоги июля оказались такими же невразумительными, как и в предыдущем месяце: нет ни находок, ни разочарований. Хотя, может, проблема во мне… Как будто меня уже нечем удивить, как будто я разучилась влюбляться в книги. Ну или просто такой период. 🇬🇧Но в сторону лирику - перейдем к цифрам. Прочитано 17 книг: 11 слр, 3 детектива, 2 фэнтези истории и 1 триллер, о котором я все никак не соберусь вам рассказать (а

2👍1🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 20:31 UTC29 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @adultcherdakPhoto

🎬 Кристофер Лэндон выступит режиссером экранизации триллера «Группа поддержки для выживших девушек» Грейди Хендрикса в формате фильма для Paramount. Последние девушки — свидетельницы массовых убийств, которым повезло остаться в живых, убив своего монстра. Худшая ночь в их жизни заканчивается, но что происходит с ними потом? Линнетт Таркингтон регулярно посещает группу психологической поддержки для выживших девушек.

🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 20:31 UTC27 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Я почти месяц пытаюсь написать отзыв на эту книгу (спойлер: она крутая 😍). А тут такая новость!

1

26 Jul 2026, 20:18 UTC36 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Закончила перечитывать любимых «Мертвых мальчишек Гровроуза». Так больно, что аж хорошо… Или наоборот. Прошло уже больше года с момента первого прочтения, а я до сих пор не могу перестать о них думать. Пожалуй, это мой сам долгоиграющий гиперфикс. Моя римская империя 😊☺️ В этот раз я читала не одна. И опыт совместного чтения и обсуждения заставил меня еще глубже погрузиться в историю, посмотреть на нее немного под

3❤‍🔥3🔥2

7 Jul 2026, 11:59 UTC45 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Сто лет не смотрела книжных блогеров. А тут вдруг посмотрела и вдохновилась на обещанный мной отзыв об уютном детективе, который, вопреки моим ожиданиям, совсем не связан с бракосочетанием 😀 В одном из зеленых районов Лондона все знают Элли Квик из благотворительного магазинчика. Недавно овдовев, она целыми днями смотрит в окно. Пока в один из вечеров миссис Доуз, которую не так-то легко вывести из равновесия, буква

3🔥2😍2

30 Jun 2026, 18:52 UTC40 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Книжные итоги июня в студию! 📍Пожалуй, самый не запоминающийся месяц в плане чтения 😀 не было ни откровенно плохих книг, ни особенно шикарных. Хорошо ли это? Не думаю. От книг я жду каких-то выдающихся эмоций. 💙Итак, прочитано 18 книг: 4 фэнтези, 8 детективов, 5 слр и внезапно 1 нон-фикш. Вы можете спросить, где же тогда отзывы. А я вам отвечу: к сожалению, на большинство прочитанных мной книг я не могу оставлять о

2💔1😢1

13 Jun 2026, 19:30 UTC46 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Неожиданно 😊 кажется, Мариана Запата пошла по проторенной дорожке Али Хейзелвуд - от слр к ромфанту с оборотнями 😀 Посмотрим, что вышло. Предзаказ делать не буду, но в Яндекс.Книгах почитаю

2

11 Jun 2026, 10:22 UTC41 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Оформила предзаказ на новую книгу автора моих любимых «Мертвых мальчишек» 🌵 Давненько такого со мной не случалось - чтобы я ждала бумажную книгу из предзаказа. Но уверена, что она того стоит. История обещает быть супер интересной 🐶 https://www.mann-ivanov-ferber.ru/catalog/product/biuro-nenormalnyx-del-poxititel-kartin/

👍21🔥1

10 Jun 2026, 14:36 UTC40 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

«Вы не ждали нас, а мы приперлися», или как эффектно прервать затянувшееся молчание. Принесла вам неожиданную рекомендацию - не любовный роман и даже не фанфик, а нон-фикшн от стендап комикессы (это не я придумала, а автор!) и писательницы Натальи Красновой «Принцесса на всю голову. Почему мы влюбляемся в сказочных дураков». Аннотация И сыграли они пышную свадьбу! И жили долго и счастливо! Конец. Этим словом закан

🔥21😁1

2 Jun 2026, 14:01 UTC41 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Я дико извиняюсь, что пропала с радаров. Но что поделать - я не в потоке, не в ресурсе и не в настроении. Так что пробегусь кратко по итогам апреля и мая. 💚В апреле прочитано 19 книг. Тогда я еще была с головой погружена в цикл Романа Суржикова «Полари», поглощая один толстый том за другим, что и стало самым ярким пятном из моей читательской мозаики. Еще мне особенно запомнились «Беспощадный лед» Тейлор Фицпатрик (п

5❤‍🔥5🔥41

18 May 2026, 06:07 UTC55 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Джош Лэньон, хоть и американка, но стиль у нее чисто английский 😀 — Вы хотите сказать, что ваша мать считала вашего отца сбежавшим нацистом? — Это был удар Джейка по юридической части в самое сердце. Эвелин задумчиво посмотрела на него. — Помимо всего прочего. Семейная шутка заключается в том, что мой отец убил свою первую жену, чтобы жениться на моей матери. Это было семейное чувство юмора. Кому она приходилась род

🤣1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @pink_flamingo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,061,759 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Розовый фламинго” (@pink_flamingo), 37 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pink_flamingo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.