кто мне там обещал задонатить за танцы из доуина...
🔥5👍2🥰1

Channel
@pickmecospl
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
13subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002758795226 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pickmecospl |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 7 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pickmecospl |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 13 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:00 | 13 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 7 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
78 reactions across 10 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 25 | 32.1% | |
| ❤ | 11 | 14.1% | |
| 🍓 | 11 | 14.1% | |
| 💘 | 8 | 10.3% | |
| custom 5332673485393131084 | 5 | 6.41% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 6.41% | |
| custom 5334841782452646372 | 3 | 3.85% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 3.85% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 3.85% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 3.85% | |
| 👾 | 1 | 1.28% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 78reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2025 to 21 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
кто мне там обещал задонатить за танцы из доуина...
🔥5👍2🥰1
сделано✅✅
🔥3
блин надо наверное норм название придумать наконец то да
🔥3
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 S U A 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 My savior, 가련한 여인이여 Make me your god, I can give you everything 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟
💘8❤3❤🔥3🍓2👏1👾1🔥1🥰1
!! 𝑨𝑵𝑵𝑶𝑼𝑵𝑪𝑬 !! всем привет кто думал что я умерла, у меня тут кое что намечается так что не отписывайтесь пожалуйста ближайшие 2 недели ՞߹ - ߹՞
❤4🍓2🔥2👍1
. 💛💛🧡🧡❤️🔴⚪️🔴❤️🧡🧡💛💛 . 🎉🔣🔠🌟🌟🔡🌟🌟🔡🌟ˋˋ🎵ˎˎ🎉 🔴💛💛🧡🧡❤️🌟❤️🧡🧡➰💛💛⚪️ 𝘐 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘯𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘧𝘦𝘦𝘭 𝘭𝘰𝘯𝘦𝘭𝘺 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘢𝘨𝘢𝘪𝘯 (𝘔𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘤𝘳𝘢𝘻𝘺!) 𝘙𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘰𝘯 𝘮𝘺 𝘤𝘶𝘦, (𝘔𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘤𝘳𝘢𝘻𝘺!) 𝘎𝘦𝘵 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘦𝘺𝘦𝘴 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘨𝘦 𝘐𝘵'𝘴 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘸𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦, (𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘸𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦!) 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵'𝘴 𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵, (𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵'𝘴 𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵!) 𝘸𝘦 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰𝘨𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘢𝘴 𝘰𝘯𝘦 ⚪️💛💛✨🧡🧡❤️✨❤️🧡🧡💛💛🔴 ╰┈➤⚪️🌟 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🌟⚪️
❤3🔥2🥰2🍓1👏1
Кабуто хочется, хм хм, хочется🌟
🔥3🍓1
「🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟!!」 夢のセカイとセカイを 繋ぐProject Welcome to Wonderland !!🌟 WANDAHOI!! ✨Мы - Потатики, недавно сформированный косбенд из Самарской области. Мы подарим всем улыбки! Наши участники: 🩷Эму Отори 💛Тсукаса Тенма 💚Нене Кусанаги 🩵Хатсуне Мику 💜Руи Камиширо 🌟Наш телеграмм канал / тик ток. Не забывайте подписываться, ваша поддержка очень важна для нас!
🔥4🍓3
thank you all for coming ૮₍╥﹏╥₎ა
🍓2🔥2❤1👏1🥰1
😝 HATSUNE MIKU | 初音ミ🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Hello, everyone! I'm Hatsune Miku, a virtual idol! Well, that's what everyone seems to think, but secretly I'm てへ
custom 53326734853931310845custom 53348417824526463723
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @pickmecospl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,057,840 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“aneegiri_228 🍙 пикми №1 ever” (@pickmecospl), 13 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pickmecospl.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.