☕️ physics cafe pinned «آشنایی با گرایش محاسبات و اطلاعات کوانتومی در رشته فیزیک ارائه دهندگان: دکتر وحید کریمیپور دکتر صالح رحیمی-کشاری دکتر صادق رئیسی 🎞 ویدیو در یوتیوب 🎧 فایل صوتی از aparat.com/v/bRiFc ما در ۸ برنامه به معرفی گرایشهای فیزیک پرداختیم. در این برنامهها…»

Channel
☕️ physics cafe
@physicscafe1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
111subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002019254659 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @physicscafe1 |
| Description | 🔰حلقه مطالعاتی نیایش🔰 🔹️نشانی کانال ما در ایتا : https://eitaa.com/physicscafe 🔹️نشانی کانال پشتیبان کتب و جزوات و نشریات و مقالات : https://t.me/physicxcafe1 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/physicscafe1 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:01 | 111 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:18 | 111 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 65.0%
- avg views ÷ 111 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 72.2
- 15 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 4.01%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 16
- of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (24 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,083 |
| Reactions total | 32 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 169
- Videos
- 118
- Links
- 393
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
32 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 25.0% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 21.9% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 21.9% | |
| 🤣 | 7 | 21.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 9.38% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
#پاسخ_مسئله در این پاسخبرگ، بررسی شده است که اگر این دو موجود بیآزار را رها کنیم، زمانی که لازم است تا کاملا خالی شود، چقدر است و در ضمن یک مقایسه کوچیک هم بینشون انجام شده است پ.ن: حقیقتا نمیدونم درسته یا نه اگر نکتهای به ذهنتون رسید، به اشتراک بگذارید ☕️physics cafe
#کتاب_فروشی 📚سمفونی مردگان 👤عباس معروفی 📍انتشارات ققنوس 🔸زبان کتاب: فارسی 🔹موضوع کتاب: رمانهای ایرانی 🗓سال انتشار: ۱۴۰۳ 🔴قیمت فعلی کتاب: ۵۵۰.۰۰۰ 🟢قیمت کتاب با تخفیف ویژه: ۳۵۰.۰۰۰تومان 📚سال بلوا 👤عباس معروفی 📍انتشارات ققنوس 🔸زبان کتاب: فارسی 🔹موضوع کتاب: رمانهای ایرانی 🗓سال انتشار: ۱۴۰۴ 🔴قیمت فعلی کتاب: ۵۵۰.۰۰۰ 🟢قیمت کتاب با تخفیف ویژه: ۳۵۰.۰۰۰تومان 📚عقاید یک دلقک 👤هاینریش بل 🗣محمد اسماعیل زاده 📍انتشارات چشمه 🔸…
🔥2
بستیم چو از ردّ و قبولِ دگران چشم تشریفِ قبولِ نظرِ یار گرفتیم 👤حزین لاهیجی ☕️physics cafe
🔥3❤1
90. Covariant / Contravariant /koʊˈver.i.ənt/ /ˌkɑːn.trəˈver.i.ənt/ – هموردا / پادوردا ➤ Two transformation properties of vectors/tensors under coordinate changes: covariant components transform like basis vectors, contravariant like coordinates. 🔹 دو خاصیت تبدیل بردارها/تانسورها تحت تغییر مختصات: مؤلفههای هموردا مانند بردارهای پایه تغییر میکنند، پادوردا مانند مختصات. 📌 مثال: The metric tensor relates covariant a…
📖 #واژهنامه 81. Operator /ˈɑː.pə.reɪ.t̬ɚ/ – عملگر (تکرار با مفهوم جدید) ➤ A mathematical object that maps a function or vector to another function or vector (e.g., Hamiltonian, momentum operator in QM). 🔹 شیء ریاضی که یک تابع یا بردار را به تابع یا بردار دیگر نگاشت میدهد (مثل همیلتونی، عملگر تکانه در مکانیک کوانتوم). 📌 مثال: Apply the Laplacian operator to the wavefunction. (عملگر لاپلاس را روی تابع موج اعمال کنید…
https://homes.cs.washington.edu/~shayan/islam.html پسر چه آدمای عجیبی توی زمانه ما زندگی میکنند "حتما بخونید" ☕️physics cafe
❤🔥2
#هندسه_دیفرانسیل 6⃣ بخش ششم | انتقال موازی؛ چگونه جهت یک بردار را در فضای خمیده حفظ کنیم؟ 🔹فرض کنید روی سطح یک کره ایستادهاید و یک پیکان در دست دارید. میخواهید آن را از نقطهای به نقطهای دیگر ببرید، اما بدون آنکه آن را بچرخانید. 🔹در یک صفحهی تخت، این کار کاملاً ساده است؛ کافی است بردار را جابهجا کنید و جهت آن تغییر نخواهد کرد. اما روی یک سطح خمیده، داستان کاملاً متفاوت است. 🔹در فضای خمیده، حتی اگر در تمام م…
🔥1
همسایههامون ترسناک شدند🫣😬 پ.ن: نقاب از بهر آن باشد که بربندند روی زشت تو زیبایی به نام ایزد چرا باید که بربندی؟ 👤سعدی
🤣5
#پاسخ_مسئله 📌پاسخ منبع سمت راستی است. (البته این نتیجهای است که خودم بهش رسیدم و نمیدونم درسته یا نه. استدلالها منطقی بنظر میرسه ولی شرایط آزمون تجربی برام فراهم نبودش) پ.ن: در این پاسخبرگ، بصورت نسبی مشخص شده که کدوم منبع زودتر تموم میشه اگر مایل بودید، زمان دقیقش و با فرض اینکه سرعت حرکت سطح آب تقریبا صفر هستش و ارسال میکنم ☕️physics cafe
❤🔥1
#موقت بریم برای نگارش یک #دفترچه_خاطرات با موضوع دکتر روشن؟😉 شما هم اگر خاطره جالبی از اساتید دارید با ما در میون بزارید
👍3
در مقابل نکات و سوالات اشتباهی هم که دانشجویان به مطالبشان وارد میکردند هم سیاست خاصی داشتند. همیشه با یک نیمچه لبخندی که مشخص بود از سر تمسخر نیست، به دانشجو میگفتند که : ( حالا فکر نمیکنید اینجوری بشه، یا این درستتر باشه؟) واقعا همهچیزش با اساتید دیگر تفاوت میکرد. بشدت انسان منظمی بود و اخلاق خاصخودش را داشت. وقتی با او سخن میگفتی، از حالت چهرهاش نمیتوانستی بفهمی آیا منتظر است تا گورت را از اتاقش گم کن…
❤5👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @physicscafe1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,084,737 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“☕️ physics cafe” (@physicscafe1), 111 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/physicscafe1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.