Есть идеи почему этот забор такой?) (Фото из интернета, владельца не нашла)
🔥5

Channel
@physics_for_children
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
338subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 5 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001684171798 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @physics_for_children |
| Description | Знакомим детей с физикой и математикой интересно, доступным языком |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 5 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/physics_for_children |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 10:22 | 338 | no change |
| 5 Sept 2026, 09:47 | 338 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 17 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (17 February 2026 – 23 August 2026) |
| Views total | 73 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Sept 2026, 10:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
123 reactions across 12 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 45 | 36.6% | |
| 🔥 | 45 | 36.6% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 11.4% | |
| 🙏 | 6 | 4.88% | |
| 🤗 | 4 | 3.25% | |
| 🤨 | 3 | 2.44% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 1.63% | |
| 🤓 | 2 | 1.63% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.813% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.813% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 123 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 17 February 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Есть идеи почему этот забор такой?) (Фото из интернета, владельца не нашла)
🔥5
🔥🇷🇺 Друзья, сегодня мы хотим не только поздравить вас с праздником Победы, но и вспомнить удивительные истории биомедтех-разработок военного времени – пример того, как в условиях катастрофического дефицита ресурсов и времени ученые совершали прорывы, которые до сих пор спасают жизни. Желаем вам мира и уверенности в завтрашнем дне. 💉 Первый советский антибиотик Крустозин В 1942 году, когда импорт западного пенициллин…
❤7👍3🔥3
Поздравляю всех!
❤10🔥3
Каждое 1 апреля от меня отписывается кто-нибудь без чувства юмора) Конечно, предыдущий пост был первоапрельской шуткой 😁 Кто догадался сразу, тот молодец 🏆 P.S. хотя, как говорят, в каждой шутке есть доля шутки....)))))
🔥6🤗4😁1
Photo, posted without a caption
Забудь на минуту всё, что ты знаешь из учебников. Не потому, что это неправда, а потому что тебе показали только одну сторону картины. Сейчас я хочу, чтобы ты взглянул шире. Да, наша планета имеет форму шара — это факт, который невозможно отрицать. Но вот что тебе не говорят: размеры этого шара настолько колоссальны, что мы физически не способны охватить взглядом его истинную структуру. На этом шаре, на его поверхно…
🔥5
Video, posted without a caption
🔥8
Ответ.
Вопрос. Что не так с этой моделью солнечной системы? (с кем уже обсуждали это, не отвечайте, не разрушайте интригу🫶🏻)
🔥7❤2
Каких женщин-учёных вы знаете помимо Марии Кюри? Кто первый приходит в голову? Или может знаете об изобретении, придуманном именно женщиной? Я понимаю, таких может быть много, но может что-то вам особенно запомнилось? Меня, например, в свое время удивило, что автомобильные дворники придумала женщина Мэри Андерсон в 1903 году.
🤨3👍2
https://youtu.be/-kXQdYDIZ2s?si=zDPYO15Fxe3i5mQd
❤4🔥1🙏1
Мария Кюри 6+ Один из выпусков французского сериала «Жили-были… Первооткрыватели» был посвящен Марии Склодовской-Кюри - первой женщине, получившей Нобелевскую премию в истории! В мультике не только рассказано о том, как Кюри и ее муж открыли радий, но и довольно открыто говорится о женском вопросе - что женщины долгое время не могли учиться в университетах, и уж точно не могли преподавать. Но, в частности, благода…
👍7🙏3🏆2
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @physics_for_children. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Физика вокруг нас” (@physics_for_children), 338 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/physics_for_children.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.