Урок усвоен. Когда кажется—не кажется.
🗿6

Channel
@phpandaestbambuk
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
176subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001377814352 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @phpandaestbambuk |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/phpandaestbambuk |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 176 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 175 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 2 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
80 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 29 | 36.3% | |
| 👍 | 19 | 23.8% | |
| 🔥 | 17 | 21.3% | |
| 🗿 | 8 | 10.0% | |
| 🐳 | 7 | 8.75% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 80reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2025 to 17 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Урок усвоен. Когда кажется—не кажется.
🗿6
Ну штош. Начало положено. Щас у меня пока как говорит тренер «тело в тонус придет» А дальше мне пизда. Выбиваем дурь с башки и приводим себя в порядок. Правда тут я щас ничего не делаю, жду тренера, но потом делал.
🔥8❤6👍2🐳1
Если вы увидите, что я снова начинаю с кем то мило общаться и улыбаться, ходить на встречи и тепло отзываться о человеке, уебите меня кирпичом самым тяжелым и большим, посильнее не жалея.
👍1
Здарова. Только в 33 после всего что произошло я начал по настоящему понимать Тайлера Дердена. Не потому что хочется прожить жизнь образа персонажа, а потому что после всей хуеты что происходила — ты по настоящему хочешь идти во все тяжкие и не быть больше тем самым хорошим и добрым челом.
🗿2
Ахахаха блядь, посмотрел свои сохраненки в ВК. Вот самая подходящая.😃
❤4
Я кстати еще года 3-4 назад хотел переименовать канал не «Кто там в объективе» а «Порно в объективе» Вот видимо пришло время.
❤4
Channel name was changed to «Порно в объективе 📷»
Привет! Пока не приведу себя в форму буду скидывать сюда фотографии с щеками.😃 В целом я понял что состояние у меня ебанное. Но есть моменты в жизни, которые дают надежду на улучшение ситуации, но когда, да и будет оно вообще , одному богу известно, так что мне остается только работать над собой СНОВА.
❤1
Я кстати не пиздабол, вот еду даже приготовил.
👍4🔥2
Я короче берусь за свой жир. Сгонял 8 лет я не ходил в зал. Но у меня появился шанс заниматься с тренером бесплатно, а такой момент проебать нельзя. Короче говоря главное не сдаться, я же не лох. Можете меня ЗАХУЯРИТЬ санными тряпками если я не достигну результата.
🐳4❤3👍2
В общем и целом за мои последние 6 лет произошло много хорошего, но и были плохие моменты. Все это я решил отпустить и думал а начну я новую жизнь. Но знаете как это бывает, выражение такое «Дерьмо случается» Так вот, новая глава в моей жизни началась именно с оказии. И я до сих пор не понимаю чо происходит.
❤1👍1
Привет ебать. Короче давно я не фоткал. И хз буду ли. Период в жизни такой. Я знаю что тут скорей всего люди которые меня знают лично и рандомов нет. ТАК ВОТ. Именно по этому канал будет наверное не только фото, но и чото написать, поделиться и тд тп. Я не то что бы интересная личность, возможно буду ПИЗДАСТРАДАТЬ. По этому если тебе не интересно, я не обижусь что ты отпишешься и полностью пойму. Я бы скорей все…
👍7🐳2
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @phpandaestbambuk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,292,009 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Порно в объективе 📷” (@phpandaestbambuk), 176 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/phpandaestbambuk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.