Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Photo13 | Кривко Евгения

Channel

Photo13 | Кривко Евгения

@photo13_kei

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

63subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 17 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002507314304
TypeChannel
Username@photo13_kei
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded17 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/photo13_kei

Growth

586360.517 August 2026 — 59 subscribers18 August 2026 — 59 subscribers25 August 2026 — 58 subscribers2 September 2026 — 59 subscribers10 September 2026 — 61 subscribers19 September 2026 — 63 subscribers17 August 202619 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 33 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 57–64 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 17:5863+2
10 Sept 2026, 13:3661+2
2 Sept 2026, 09:3459+1
25 Aug 2026, 10:5558-1
18 Aug 2026, 00:1559no change
17 Aug 2026, 23:4559first reading

Engagement

3 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 3 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

103 reactions across 3 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4745.6%
🔥109.71%
🥰98.74%
custom 547009278509476554687.77%
custom 547211696452666354376.80%
custom 547216333728855799376.80%
❤‍🔥43.88%
custom 544091003280166113632.91%
custom 542494313110151685921.94%
custom 543810229242118266221.94%
🍓21.94%
😍21.94%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 3 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 103 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 3 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 17:34 UTC75 views28 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Анастасия

14custom 54700927850947655466❤‍🔥4custom 54409100328016611362custom 54381022924211826621custom 54721169645266635431

29 Jul 2026, 21:04 UTC125 views31 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

love💞

14custom 54721633372885579937custom 54721169645266635436custom 54700927850947655462custom 54381022924211826621custom 54409100328016611361

15 Jul 2026, 18:12 UTC175 views44 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

feat. F/711 part 2

19🔥10🥰9🍓2😍2custom 54249431311015168592

Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @photo13_kei. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Photo13 | Кривко Евгения” (@photo13_kei), 63 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/photo13_kei.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.