Channel
@phoneaddictcf
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
151subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002650467429 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @phoneaddictcf |
| Description | предупреждение: владелец канала не профессиональный психолог/психиатр и дает советы, которые он сам лично испытал. все создано в качестве уголка для высказывания и помощи. вы сами решаете пользоваться советами или нет. symbols cr symset, s1maw, syidori tg |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/phoneaddictcf |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 151 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:31 | 151 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:28 | 152 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 15 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
44 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 13 | 29.5% | |
| custom 5449522215324247002 | 8 | 18.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 15.9% | |
| custom 5265030739778369074 | 4 | 9.09% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 9.09% | |
| 💊 | 3 | 6.82% | |
| 💘 | 3 | 6.82% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 4.55% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 15 August 2025 to 31 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Здравствуйте владельцы айфонов! Месяц назад натолкнулась на эту поеботину в отчетах конфиденциальности и оно очень настораживает. Да, использует только контакты, но блин почему он без аватарки и с названием Команд. Могу сказать точно- это не Команды ведь ещё с покупки я нахуй их удалила. Помогите🙏
❤🔥2
Signed [Rest!]⋆. 𐙚 °li~ʍᴇy``
ребят, пизда, я развиваюсь, я цдаляла телеграм на 20 дней (щас в нем практически не сижу), тоесть вообще похуй на телефон, у меня походу уже почти нет зависимости, только иногда ютуб смотрю и решаю кроссворды и сериалы на телике я себя даже не ограничиваю, я просто не сижу в телефоне потому-что не нужно. только могу вот сериалы посмотреть на выходных или ютуб, и еще у меня нет соцсетей неанон гриша [🥥] Полностью п…
❤🔥5🙏1
Signed [Rest!]⋆. 𐙚 °li~ʍᴇy``
Я боюсь. Вот до чего доводят попытки социализации. Неанон Хоко. [🥥] Как же понимаю. . . .
❤5
Signed ⋆. 𐙚 °li~ʍᴇy``
[🥥] Адм.тейк наконец-то. . . .ну я в шоке, вроде не так долго играла,а я еще собиралась. . .(Лаума того стоила)
custom 54495222153242470025
Signed ⋆. 𐙚 °li~ʍᴇy``
Ура я добила 5уровень в эвейд! А что это за циферки Блин опять рандомайзером накрутили и радуются
Signed ⋆. 𐙚 °li~ʍᴇy``
янемогуперестатьсмотретьтиктокбояььь пытаюсь избавиться от зависимости, родители ставили родительский контроль (до него было 10+ч, поставили ограничение 1.5 часа💔💔) нашла способ обойти его, но только браузер, к сожалению. потом телефон с рк разбился😜 уговорила родителей на время убрать рк начали следить за моей успеваемостью и оценками и вроде если все будет хорошо то смогу продолжить без контроля стараюсь как могу🐦…
💊3❤1
Signed ⋆. 𐙚 °li~ʍᴇy``
как заставить себя захотеть избавиться от телефонной зависимости? это очень мешает в жизни, но у меня нет желания с этим бороться. все хобби кажутся скучными в сравнении с телефоном, общение в реальной жизни не нравится. типа мне реально ничего кроме телефона не интересно
Signed ⋆. 𐙚 °li~ʍᴇy``
А ой лайки лучше эваде [🥥] Ох. . .Я боюсь того что происходит в лайке. . .
❤1
Signed ⋆. 𐙚 °li~ʍᴇy``
.привет доп к тому тецкууууу (если что я не умник в таких темах, не верьте всему что я скажу) . тикток и другие платформы типа шортсов и лайков, в которых быстрые короткие видео, укорачивают вашу быструю/короткую память, из за этого у вас могут быть проблемы со стихами, пересказами и так далее🥺 из за этого вы поедаете информацию только в коротком формате либо через слова напоминалки, например: 1. вариант а: от учитил…
custom 52650307397783690744❤3custom 54495222153242470023
Signed ⋆. 𐙚 °li~ʍᴇy``
.привет .ограничьте себе тикток мысленно на полтора часа .заходите иногда на одно видео .ваше наказание 1 здровое блюдо и выход в магазин за одним помидором .пожалуйста выслушайте меня это работаеь😊😊😊😊😊😊
🔥4
Signed ⋆. 𐙚 °li~ʍᴇy``
Оно так и не добило 50 лвл [🥥] ох. . . кстати,всех подписчиков с 1-ым сентября,с днем ада дажн тех кто не идёт в школу/другое учебное заведение кидайте сколько сидели в телефоне этим летом
Signed ⋆. 𐙚 °li~ʍᴇy``
😳😳мы переехали и нам неделю инет чинили, не было инета, а в пятницу подруга пригла в гостт, роздала инет и мы смотрели интернов блин, мне так непривычно когда появился инет, я уже пртвыкла все время без него быть неанон грища
💘3
Signed ⋆. 𐙚 °li~ʍᴇy``
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @phoneaddictcf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 963,689 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“✶͟ Ｐhone Ａddiction ｃｆ：перезагрузка !” (@phoneaddictcf), 151 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/phoneaddictcf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.