Channel
@philosophiacademy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
411subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 25 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001635941256 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @philosophiacademy |
| Description | Felsefe Akademisine Hoş Geldiniz. 📚Büyük düşünürlerden ve usta kalemlerden alıntılar, ✍️Hayat felsefesi yapılacak sözler, Felsefe Tartışma Grubumuz: @felsefeakademia |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 25 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/philosophiacademy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 10:22 | 411 | no change |
| 25 Sept 2026, 09:47 | 411 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (19 August 2026 – 23 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,318 |
| Reactions total | 71 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Sept 2026, 10:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
115 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 26 | 22.6% | |
| ❤ | 25 | 21.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 19 | 16.5% | |
| 💯 | 14 | 12.2% | |
| 👌 | 8 | 6.96% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 6.96% | |
| ✍ | 6 | 5.22% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 3.48% | |
| 🆒 | 3 | 2.61% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 1.74% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 115 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 August 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Bireysel büyülenmenin bireyciliği doğurması gibi, kolektif büyülenme de bir "kolektif bireycilik" doğurur, adı da milliyetçilik, şovenizm ve otarşi ruhudur. Bireysel ve kolektif mitoslar kardeştir çünkü her zaman Aynının Aynıya karşıtlığının üstünü örterler. ⚡Kendi olma isteği gibi "kendi arasında" olma isteği de Öteki olma arzusunu saklar. ⚡Sodom ve Gomorra 'nın cehenneminde nefretin zaferi mutlaktır. ⚡Kölel…
❤🔥3😁2🙏2
⚡Mazoşist görüş hiçbir zaman bağımsız değildir. Her zaman, aynı öğeleri simetrik ve tam tersi bir yapıda örgütleyen rakip bir mazoşizme karşıttır. İkili tablonun bir bölümünde İyi olarak tanımlanmış bir şey öteki bölümde otomatik olarak kötü olarak tanımlanır, kötü de iyi olarak. #Edebiyat_Düşünce #Felsefe #Dostoyevski_Proust #Nietzsche #Mazoşist #Kötülüğün_Ruhu
❤🔥3❤2👌2
Bu yüzden de coşkuyla yadsımıştır Kötülüğü: Tıpkı yeraltı adamı gibi, kendinde gözlemlediği ve tüm ahlaksal yaşamını yalanlıyormuş gibi duran bazı tatsız olgulara ilk şaşıran da yine kendisidir. ⚡Mazoşist temelde kötümserdir. Kötü'nün sonunda zafer kazanacağını bilmektedir. Haklı dava uğruna umutsuzca savaşır. Umutsuz olduğu ölçüde daha da "övgüye değer" dir bu savaş. Sinik ahlakçılar için, ve biraz farklı bir an…
🔥3❤2💯2
Mazoşist tüm "hakarete uğramışlarla, küçük düşmüşlerle", ona uzaktan kendi yazgısını hatırlatan tüm gerçek ve düşsel talihsizliklerle özdeşleştirir kendini. ⚡Mazoşistin diş bilediği, tastamam Kötülüğün Ruhudur. Yine de kötüleri ezmekten çok, onların kötülüklerini ve kendisinin iyiliğini kanıtlamak ister: Onlara alçaklıklarının kurbanlarını seyrettirmek ve böylece onları utandırmak ister. ⚡Arzunun bu aşamasında…
❤🔥3👌2🔥2
"Bizimki gibi bir toplumda asıl siyasi görev, hem nötr hem de bağımsız ... görünen kurumların işleyişini eleştirmek. .. kişinin onlara karşı mücadele edebilmesi için onlara eleştiri ve saldırı yöneltmektir." ~Michel Foucault #Sosyoloji_Felsefe #Düşünce
❤3🔥3🆒2
Sesli Konusu Ne İstediğini Bilmeyen Erkek: Kararsızlığın Duygusal Bedeli https://t.me/psikolojiveruhsagligi?videochat=5456f261f0096ace59
❤1👏1💯1
Sesli Konusu Ne İstediğini Bilmeyen Erkek: Kararsızlığın Duygusal Bedeli Saat 21:00'da @psikolojiveruhsagligi nda
👏1💯1🆒1
⚡Kendi bilinci hâline gelmek için dünyayı yaratmak gibi bilinç işi olan bu derin dünya hesabını bilinçsiz bir fikir’e izafe etmek saçma ve çelişmeli değil midir?”. Özdekçiliği de içine alan tüm felsefeyi evrensel düşüncecilik sayan Hegel (çünkü Hegel’e göre bizzat özdek de bir kavramdır, eşdeyişle geneldir) Elea’cılarla Platon -Aristoteles geleneğine dayanmakla beraber özellikle Spinoza, Hume ve Kant’dan da yararla…
❤🔥2👏1💯1
Hegel'in bu varsayımına bir çeşit doğatanrıcılık da denebilir. Fransız düşünürü Henri Lefebvre,, Hegel’in, dolayısıyle idealizmin büyük paradokslarını şöyle özetlemektedir: “ Fikir, diyor Hegel, bizden önce, düşünüş ve uygarlık tarihinden önce, dünyadan önce vardır. Ama o zaman bilinçsiz’dir. O, kendisinin bilincine ancak çelişmeler arasında, engellere çarparak, çatışmalar arasında varabilir. ⚡Peki, ne yapıyor?…
❤🔥2❤1👏1
Hegel’e göre tarihin, sosyal hayatın, moral ve politik hayatın, doğruyu aramanın muharriki bu meşhur fikir’dir. ⚡Oluş ve oluşun bütün çelişmeleri fikirce açıklanır. Dünya ve tabiat, içte görüneni dışta sanmadır (exteriorisation), fikir’in nihayet kendi bilincine ulaşınca tekrar kazanılan, bulunan, kendine gelen bir yabancılaşmadır, alination’udur. Daha başlangıçtan itibaren bu tez garip şekilde aykırı görünmekte…
🔥2👏1💯1
#Tarih_Din_Tanrı #Güç_İktidar_Toplum #Adalet_Coğrafya
🔥2👏1💯1
Ortadoğu Mutsuzluğu "Devletin dört ana direğinden ( din, adalet, yönetim, hazine) biri sarsılacak ya da güçsüz düşecek olursa, insanların işi Tanrı'ya kalmıştır artık." “Of Seditions and Troubles” (İsyanlar ve Karışıklıklar Üzerine) ~Francis Bacon Adaletin Çökmesi: Hukukun üstünlüğü kaybolduğunda, bireyler haklarını kurumsal yollarla arayamaz hale gelir. ⚡Güven duygusu yok olur. Hazinenin Bozulması…
❤2❤🔥2😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @philosophiacademy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Felsefe Akademisi” (@philosophiacademy), 411 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/philosophiacademy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.