Channel
@philofix
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
481subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002203992404 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @philofix |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/philofix |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:52 | 481 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:31 | 481 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 5 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
155 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | 44 | 28.4% | |
| 👍 | 31 | 20.0% | |
| ❤ | 28 | 18.1% | |
| 💯 | 22 | 14.2% | |
| 🔥 | 17 | 11.0% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 4.52% | |
| 🤝 | 4 | 2.58% | |
| 😡 | 1 | 0.645% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.645% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 155reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 April 2026 to 9 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Alhamdulillah, Sometimes life becomes heavier than words can explain. Lately... many things have weighed on my heart, and I feel deeply tired..mentally and emotionally. So I’ve decided to step back for a while. Not because I’m giving up or afraid of failing… Allah is always with me. but sometimes the strongest thing a person can do is pause, breathe, and seek inner peace. True peace isn’t found in noise, crowds, so…
👍23💯6🤝4⚡3
Some clients don't just take your time; they drain your energy. They question every move, yet still expect premium results on a budget. The truth is.... not every client deserves access to you. The wrong ones cost more than money; they cost your creativity, your confidence, and your peace. Learn the red flags early. Walk away without guilt. Because your best work only happens with the right people.
💯11⚡1
Light mode for clarity ☀️ or dark mode for the vibe 🌙… Same design, different mood. Are you choosing with your eyes… or your personality?
⚡4
I have been using it for a long time now, it’s like an all in one site for designers and creatives✨.... you can find mockups, fonts, text effects, textures, patterns, and a lot more and most of the resources are free and really high quality✨ Definitely worth checking out...👇 resourceboy.com #resources @ahlumina
⚡2
This is my office setup. Clean space, calm mind. Less distraction, more creation. This is the kind of vibe that gets things done. Rate it out of 10.....
⚡21💯4
Good morning.... We're back ተሰልፈናል........
😁1
Time to find someone who completes my Iman… what do you think?
⚡11👍3
Centre of Gulf countries
😁2
Video, posted without a caption
አቶት
2nd round😎
👍1
Alhamdulillah… Woke up to a calm morning, had breakfast, and now just enjoying a simple cup of coffee (Gahwa Arabi☕️) Peaceful vibes, beautiful weather… it feels right. But here’s something...... 😄 The more I observe, the more I start seeing little signs.... like the people here have that Gulf/Arab vibe. Small “isharas” everywhere… interesting feeling. Anyway, today I’m heading out to my haja and explore a bit mo…
❤9🔥2⚡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @philofix. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,187,335 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“philofix.” (@philofix), 481 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/philofix.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.