Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Фоторедакция

Channel

Фоторедакция

@phhotoforyou

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

321subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003091008426
TypeChannel
Username@phhotoforyou
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/phhotoforyou

Growth

321322321.58 August 2026 — 322 subscribers8 August 2026 — 322 subscribers15 August 2026 — 321 subscribers8 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 321–322 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 09:28321-1
8 Aug 2026, 07:30322no change
8 Aug 2026, 01:36322first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 29 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
52.3%
avg views ÷ 321 subscribers
Avg views / post
168
1 post measured
Reaction rate
16.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held13 (29 May 202629 July 2026)
Views total168
Reactions total28
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 07:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
11s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

396 reactions across 13 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8321.0%
❤‍🔥5714.4%
🥰5413.6%
💘379.34%
😍358.84%
👏215.30%
😁184.55%
😈164.04%
🤩164.04%
🔥143.54%
💯133.28%
🤣102.53%
💋41.01%
😢41.01%
🙏30.758%
🍓20.505%
🤨20.505%
🤪20.505%
10.253%
🌭10.253%
3 further kinds30.758%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 396reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 13 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @phhotoforyou. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 May 2026 to 29 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 20:22 UTC168 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Сейчас в Витебске работаю. Главная мысль вечера такая: Профессия фотографа не привязана к конкретному месту. Можно быть в любой красивой точки мира. И продолжать оставаться без клиентов

14😁7😢4🥰2👏1

8 Jul 2026, 19:00 UTC477 views27 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Купалье ВСЁ?! Мы больше не празднуем? 🌗🌿 С каждым годом кажется, что мы напрочь забываем традиции. На Масленицу вместо сжигания соломенной бабы — унылые блины в кафе, на Ивана Купала через костры уже никто не прыгает... Но значит ли это, что праздники окончательно умерли? Я была уверена, что да. Моя Масленица в России закончилась блинчиком за 245 рублей и хороводом из трёх бабушек. А это была культурная столица!

💯12😍64🤨2❤‍🔥1🥰1😘1

7 Jul 2026, 20:36 UTC408 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Раз и грудь наполнилась прохладой. Я столько дней привыкала к темноте... Изучено то дно, что стало личным адом, Но путь наверх проложен на холсте. Два. Глаза я открываю — Там солнце льётся, умывая высь. И капли ливня весело играют, Вокруг меня повсюду бьётся жизнь. Три. Вот бабушка ругает на чём свет стоит шофёра, Что перед самым носом двери затворил. Вот братья — их весё

💘14🥰5❤‍🔥42👏1💯1🙏1

7 Jul 2026, 20:36 UTC317 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Я вновь дышу...

🥰176❤‍🔥4🍓1👏1💋1🔥1🦄1

7 Jul 2026, 20:35 UTC304 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🤯Скоро будет дроп за все время моего отсутствия (я не сижу без дела, просто у меня свыше 3к фотографий на отборе🤏) Но уверена вам понравится! А пока поделюсь эгоцентричным 👀🫀

👏9❤‍🔥4💘4🥰41

8 Jun 2026, 20:13 UTC675 views42 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Осторожно – байт ⭕

❤‍🔥18🤣106🤪2🥰21🍓1👏1

8 Jun 2026, 19:45 UTC637 views39 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Друзья, гуляйте с фотографами 🥹🌸 Они вам вот такие кадры сделают. И ещё весь час будут говорить вам насколько каждое ваше движение изящно и утонченно 🙏 И самооценку поднимете, и аватарку в соц.сетях поменяете 😁🫶

18😍10🥰6💋2🌭1👏1🔥1

1 Jun 2026, 22:11 UTC726 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сердце у меня колотится как сумасшедшее, мне уже трудно дышать, кажется, что часы в груди разбухли и перекрыли горло... Маленький принц? Алиса в стране чудес? Щелкунчик? Или может планета людей? Мне кажется все мы живём в своей реальности. И моя очень близка к той, что красиво была создана Матиасом Мальёзе в «Механике сердца». Только самые близкие люди знают, как много значит для меня каждая строка, что написана та

🥰11❤‍🔥6💘53👏1💋1

1 Jun 2026, 20:59 UTC542 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Летний привет! 🌸☀️ Всех с началом лета! Пост запоздалый, а вот настроение — нет. Пусть оно будет летним и солнечным аж до декабря. Догоняем позитив! 😜

😍11💘74👏3🙏2🥰1

30 May 2026, 08:42 UTC561 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Друзья, на меня подписался преподаватель СПбГУ. Ведите себя в комментариях прилично

😈16😁117🤯1🥰1

29 May 2026, 19:05 UTC583 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Какая обработка больше нравится?

  1. 1. Как из фильма ужасов 🫪54%
  2. 2. В золотом свечении ✨62%

The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

9💘5🔥5🥰2

29 May 2026, 19:05 UTC548 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥13😍7🔥53👏1🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @phhotoforyou. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 May 2026, 19:05 UTCAnonymous Poll71 voters

Какая обработка больше нравится?

  1. 1. Как из фильма ужасов 🫪54%
  2. 2. В золотом свечении ✨62%

The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2026 to 29 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 866,503 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Фоторедакция” (@phhotoforyou), 321 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/phhotoforyou.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.